memgraph/tests/concurrent/sl_remove_competetive.cpp
florijan a01c26439b Clean SkipList up
Summary:
- Removed a lot of stuff that was incorrect and/or unnecessary
- Fixed const-correctness in the skiplist family

Reviewers: dgleich, teon.banek, buda

Reviewed By: dgleich

Subscribers: pullbot

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1351
2018-04-11 10:08:20 +02:00

66 lines
1.9 KiB
C++

#include "common.hpp"
constexpr size_t THREADS_NO = std::min(max_no_threads, 8);
constexpr size_t op_per_thread = 1e5;
// Depending on value there is a possiblity of numerical overflow
constexpr size_t max_number = 10;
constexpr size_t no_insert_for_one_delete = 2;
// TODO: document the test
// This test checks remove method under pressure.
// Threads will try to insert and remove keys aproximetly in the same order.
// This will force threads to compete intensly with each other.
// Calls of remove method are interleaved with insert calls.
int main(int, char **argv) {
google::InitGoogleLogging(argv[0]);
map_t skiplist;
auto futures = run<std::pair<long long, long long>>(
THREADS_NO, skiplist, [](auto acc, auto index) {
auto rand_op = rand_gen_bool(no_insert_for_one_delete);
long long downcount = op_per_thread;
long long sum = 0;
long long count = 0;
for (int i = 0; downcount > 0; i++) {
auto data = i % max_number;
if (rand_op()) {
auto t = i;
while (t > 0) {
if (acc.remove(t)) {
sum -= t % max_number;
downcount--;
count--;
break;
}
t--;
}
} else {
if (acc.insert(i, data).second) {
sum += data;
count++;
downcount--;
}
}
}
return std::pair<long long, long long>(sum, count);
});
auto accessor = skiplist.access();
long long sums = 0;
long long counters = 0;
for (auto &data : collect(futures)) {
sums += data.second.first;
counters += data.second.second;
}
for (auto &e : accessor) {
sums -= e.second;
}
CHECK(sums == 0) << "Aproximetly Same values are present";
check_size(accessor, counters);
check_order(accessor);
return 0;
}