232ef77e43
Reviewers: mculinovic Reviewed By: mculinovic Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1420
33 lines
1002 B
Markdown
33 lines
1002 B
Markdown
# Public Benchmarks
|
|
|
|
## ldbc interactive workload
|
|
|
|
* https://ldbc.github.io/ldbc_snb_docs_snapshot/ldbc-snb-specification.pdf
|
|
|
|
## TODO: ldbc bi workload (priority 10)
|
|
|
|
* https://ldbc.github.io/ldbc_snb_docs_snapshot/ldbc-snb-specification.pdf
|
|
|
|
## TODO: arango public benchmark (priority 100)
|
|
|
|
* https://www.arangodb.com/2018/02/nosql-performance-benchmark-2018-mongodb-postgresql-orientdb-neo4j-arangodb
|
|
* https://github.com/weinberger/nosql-tests
|
|
|
|
## TODO: dgraph benchmark (priority 5)
|
|
|
|
* https://github.com/dgraph-io/benchmarks
|
|
* https://github.com/dgraph-io/benchmarks/blob/master/data/neo4j/query_test.go (Bolt, it was HTTP before)
|
|
|
|
## TODO: social_sensor benchmark (priority 1)
|
|
|
|
* https://github.com/socialsensor/graphdb-benchmarks
|
|
* Uses embedded databases
|
|
-> Custom work is required to run the benchmark.
|
|
-> It's time consuming to do JNI. If we run openCypher via Bolt the results won't be comparable.
|
|
|
|
## TODO: Neptune
|
|
|
|
## TODO: Tiger graph
|
|
|
|
Note: Higher number means higher priority.
|