Summary:
This is the first step in cutting the crazy dependencies of
communication module to the whole database. Includes have been
reorganized and conversion between DecodedValue and other Memgraph types
(TypedValue and PropertyValue) has been extracted to a higher level
component called `communication/conversion`. Encoder, like Decoder, now
relies only on DecodedValue. Hopefully the conversion operations will
not significantly slow down streaming Bolt data.
Additionally, Bolt ID is now wrapped in a class. Our storage model uses
*unsigned* int64, while Bolt expects *signed* int64. The implicit
conversions may lead to encode/decode errors, so the wrapper should
enforce some type safety to prevent such errors.
Reviewers: mferencevic, buda, msantl, mtomic
Reviewed By: mferencevic, mtomic
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1453
Summary:
Converts the RPC stack to use Cap'n Proto for serialization instead of
boost. There are still some traces of boost in other places in the code,
but most of it is removed. A future diff should cleanup boost for good.
The RPC API is now changed to be more flexible with regards to how
serialize data. This makes the simplest cases a bit more verbose, but
allows complex serialization code to be correctly written instead of
relying on hacks. (For reference, look for the old serialization of
`PullRpc` which had a nasty pointer hacks to inject accessors in
`TypedValue`.)
Since RPC messages were uselessly modeled via inheritance of Message
base class, that class is now removed. Furthermore, that approach
doesn't really work with Cap'n Proto. Instead, each message type is
required to have some type information. This can be automated, so
`define-rpc` has been added to LCP, which hopefully simplifies defining
new RPC request and response messages.
Specify Cap'n Proto schema ID in cmake
This preserves Cap'n Proto generated typeIds across multiple generations
of capnp schemas through LCP. It is imperative that typeId stays the
same to ensure that different compilations of Memgraph may communicate
via RPC in a distributed cluster.
Use CLOS for meta information on C++ types in LCP
Since some structure slots and functions have started to repeat
themselves, it makes sense to model C++ meta information via Common Lisp
Object System.
Depends on D1391
Reviewers: buda, dgleich, mferencevic, mtomic, mculinovic, msantl
Reviewed By: msantl
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1407
Summary:
Add additional structs and functions for handling C++ meta information.
Add capnp-file and capnp-id arguments to lcp:process-file.
Generate cpp along with hpp and capnp in lcp.
Wrap LogicalOperator base class in lcp:define-class.
Modify logical operators for capnp serialization.
Add query/common.capnp.
Reviewers: mculinovic, buda, mtomic, msantl, ipaljak, dgleich, mferencevic
Reviewed By: msantl
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1391
Summary:
A simplified end-to-end implementation
POD interface set-up, still have bugs with HDDkeys
Version bug fix and first iterator implementation
Fixed out-of-scope reference in PVS iterator
Added PVS unit tests
Reviewers: buda, mferencevic, dgleich, teon.banek
Reviewed By: buda, dgleich
Subscribers: mferencevic, pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1369
Summary: Global address of `from` was stored in Edge record when created via CreateEdge RPC.
Reviewers: buda, msantl, dgleich
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1387
Summary:
- Removed a lot of stuff that was incorrect and/or unnecessary
- Fixed const-correctness in the skiplist family
Reviewers: dgleich, teon.banek, buda
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1351
Summary: Do it so properties-on-disk can be implemented.
Reviewers: buda, dgleich
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1343
Summary:
Remove "produce_" and "Produce" as prefix from all distributed stuff.
It's not removed in src/query/ stuff (operators).
Reviewers: dgleich
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1315
Summary: This is correct, and uses less memory.
Reviewers: teon.banek, buda, mislav.bradac
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1304
Summary:
Also removed some convenience code that became obsolete.
No logic changes.
Reviewers: teon.banek
Reviewed By: teon.banek
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1303
Summary:
Instead of passing `coordination`, pass `rpc_worker_clients` that
holds a map of worker_id->clientPool. By having only one instance of
`RpcWorkerClients` that is owned by `GraphDB` and passing it by refference
we'll share the same client pools for rpc clients.
Reviewers: teon.banek, florijan, dgleich, mferencevic
Reviewed By: florijan
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1261
Summary:
Previously, the RPC stack used the network stack only to receive messages. The
messages were then added to a separate queue that was processed by different
thread pools. This design was inefficient because there was a lock when
inserting and getting messages from the common queue.
This diff removes the need for separate thread pools by utilising the new
network stack design. This is possible because the new network stack allows
full processing of the network request without blocking the whole queue.
Reviewers: buda, florijan, teon.banek, dgleich, mislav.bradac
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1229
Summary:
Updating a record locally while there is an remote update waiting to be applied caused
the operation to return as already deleted, instead of applying it
Reviewers: florijan
Reviewed By: florijan
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1226
Summary:
Implementation of remote vertex and edge creation. This diff addresses
the creation API (`GraphDbAccessor::InsertEdge`,
`GraphDbAccessor::InsertRemoteVertex`) and the necessary RPC and
`RemoteCache` stuff.
What is missing for full remote creation support are
`query::plan::operator` changes that are expected to minor. Pushing this
diff as it's large enough, operator and end to end tests in the next.
Also, the naming of existing structures and files is confusing (update
refering to both updates and created, `results` used too often etc.). I
will address this too, but feel free to comment on bad naming.
Reviewers: dgleich, teon.banek, msantl
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1210
Summary:
We have been using `Edges::VertexAddress` and `Edges::EdgeAddress` a lot
in other parts of the codebase because it's cleaner to write then
`Address<mvcc::VersionList<Edge>>`, especially in code what should not
really be MVCC-aware. However, a lot of that code should not really be
`Edges` aware either, as that's a storage datastructure that should not
be exposed.
This became annoying, so I extracted these addresses into a type-file. I
don't really like this approach, it might be better to have
`Vertex::Address` and `Edge::Address`, but that means we'd have to
import those headers and we'd get circular dependencies.
“The horror! The horror!”
- Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness
Reviewers: teon.banek, buda
Reviewed By: teon.banek
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1204
Summary:
Remote caches used to be owned by `GraphDbAccessor`. An advantage of
that was immediate cleanup when destructing. A disadvantage was sharing
the remote cache between mutliple program-flows in the same transaction
in distributed (one would have to share the accessor).
We will have to do post-transactional global cleanup anyway, since we
leak, which reduces the above stated advantage. And the stated
disadvantage is becoming more and more pronounced as additional
components need access to the remote cache.
Hence the refactor.
Reviewers: buda, teon.banek, msantl
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1186
Summary:
Updates are supported, insertions and removals not in this diff. The
test is a bit overdesigned, it happens.
Reviewers: teon.banek, dgleich, msantl
Reviewed By: teon.banek
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1176
Summary:
This diff consolidates local and remote update handling. It ensures and
tests that updates for remote elements are visible locally (on the
updating worker).
The next part will be accumulating remote updates and applying them on
the owner.
Also extracted a common testing fixture.
Reviewers: dgleich, buda, mtomic
Reviewed By: mtomic
Subscribers: mtomic, pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1169
Summary:
Refactor in two ways. First, expose members without getters as we will
need most of them in distributed. And this was always the sensible thing
to do. Second, add storage type values to deltas. This is also a
sensible thing to do, and it will be very beneficial in distributed. We
didn't do it before because name<->value type mappings aren't guaranteed
to be the same after recovery. A task has been added to address this
(preserve mappings in durability).
Reviewers: dgleich, buda
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1167
Summary:
It is possible that we have a global address to resolve, for a graph
element that's local. Consider W1 expanding, getting data from W2,
expanding from there and getting data that is on W1. We then don't want
to do RPC from W1 to W1, but do a lookup directly.
Reviewers: dgleich
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1145
Summary:
Start removal of old logic
Remove more obsolete classes
Move Message class to RPC
Remove client logic from system
Remove messaging namespace
Move protocol from messaging to rpc
Move System from messaging to rpc
Remove unnecessary namespace
Remove System from RPC Client
Split Client and Server into separate files
Start implementing new client logic
First semi-working state
Changed network protocol layout
Rewrite client
Fix client receive bug
Cleanup code of debug lines
Migrate to accessors
Migrate back to binary boost archives
Remove debug logging from server
Disable timeout test
Reduce message_id from uint64_t to uint32_t
Add multiple workers to server
Fix compiler warnings
Apply clang-format
Reviewers: teon.banek, florijan, dgleich, buda, mtomic
Reviewed By: teon.banek
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1129
Summary:
It seems that RecordAccessor &co are ready for read-only distributed
execution. In read-only there is no command advancement and the implied
cache invalidation, `SwitchOld` and `SwitchNew` perform default
switching and `Reconstruct` uses the `RemoteCache` which is implemented.
I just added a few TODOs for proper CRUD.
Reviewers: dgleich
Reviewed By: dgleich
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1125
Summary:
- End to end distributed GraphDb testing
- Refactors as necessary
- Basic RemoteCache for storing remote data
- RemoteDataRpc
As we are on a tight schedule, please let's focus on the essentials:
functionality and proper testing.
Reviewers: dgleich, teon.banek, buda
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1121
Summary:
Virtual destructors were missing in classes/structs which can
be inherited.
A missing virtual destructor gives undefined behaviour when
deleting derived class using base type.
Reviewers: teon.banek
Reviewed By: teon.banek
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1117
Summary:
Previously, we would have a `DCHECK` which crashes the application. This
was evident when testing a queries, such as:
MATCH (n) DELETE n SET n.prop = 42
Since the argument to update clauses is evaluated during execution, it
makes it very difficult to prevent such errors during semantic analysis.
For example:
MATCH (n)--(m) WITH collect(n) as ns, m
DETACH DELETE ns[m.prop] SET head(ns).prop = 42
Test query updates on deleted graph elements
Reviewers: florijan, dgleich
Reviewed By: florijan
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1114
