Not having one logrotate file produced an error during rpmlint. It makes sense
to have one logrotate file after Memgraph is installed because it's easier to
manage config files. There are two logrotate files in the codebase, one for
Community and one for Enterprise edition. Having rotate files per offering also
makes sense because offerings are affected less often compared to the features.
It's easier to maintain.
* Added handshake support
* Add support for v4 hello and goodbye
* Add support for pulling n results
* Add support for transactions
* Add pull n for the dump
* Add support for NOOP
* Add support for multiple queries
* Update bolt session to support qid
* Update drivers test with multiple versions and go
* Extract failure handling into a function
* Use unique ptr instead of optional for query execution
* Destroy stream before query execution
Co-authored-by: Antonio Andelic <antonio.andelic@memgraph.io>
* Add __deepcopy__ for Properties
* Fix Vertices __contains__
* Check the incoming type in Vertex and Edge __eq__
* Add NetworkX support code
* Add NetworkX algorithms
* PageRank is now included in the nxalg module
* Rewrite graph analyzer to use NetworkX support code
* Don't make the error case be the "default" case
Summary:
This change only adds streaming support to the client request. The client
response, server request and server response are still handled only when all of
the data is received.
Reviewers: buda
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2807
Summary:
SLK now correctly handles different CPU architectures (BIG/little endian).
Also, more string encoding functions have been added.
Reviewers: buda
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2806
Summary:
This diff fixes the variable expand operator to work correctly then the start
and destination nodes use the same symbol or when the destination symbol is an
existing symbol.
Previously, the variable expand operator produced paths that were both
completely wrong (they shouldn't have been produced) and nonexistent (they
didn't even exist in the storage). Invalid data was produced because of a
wrong equality check that was introduced in D1703.
This issue was reported externally and the supplied test case was:
```
CREATE (p1:Person {id: 1})-[:KNOWS]->(:Person {id: 2})-[:KNOWS]->(:Person {id: 3})-[:KNOWS]->(:Person {id: 4})-[:KNOWS]->(p1);
MATCH path = (pers:Person {id: 3})-[:KNOWS*2]->(pers) RETURN path;
```
Also, tests have been added so the behavior remains correct.
Reviewers: buda
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2793
Summary:
Semantics of 'all' and 'single' were updated to be
consistent with that of 'any' and 'none'
Reviewers: mferencevic
Reviewed By: mferencevic
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2789
Summary: Change any function's handling of Null elements in a list
Reviewers: mferencevic
Reviewed By: mferencevic
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2787
Summary:
`DUMP DATABASE` used a separate transaction to read database data. That
wouldn't be an issue if the query was correctly disallowed in multicommand
transactions. Because it was allowed the output wasn't transactionally correct.
Instead of disabling `DUMP DATABASE` in multicommand transactions this change
fixes it so that it works properly in multicommand transactions.
Reviewers: buda
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2781
Summary:
Before this change properties were joined by ", " and returned as a single string,
which was ambiguous for properties that contain ", ". This diff solves this
problem by returning properties as a list type.
Reviewers: mferencevic
Reviewed By: mferencevic
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2778
Summary:
In case something has to be updated in `release/LICENSE_ENTERPRISE.md`
please put your comments in the document marked with `UPCOMING`
inside this https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GbnryzrjkmNDVigac4d1x__JWbiqlxMD
folder because the content has to be valid from the legal standpoint
(it requires some legal review).
Reviewers: mferencevic
Reviewed By: mferencevic
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D2770
