Summary:
What's done:
- `RecordAccessor` can represent remote data
- `GraphDbAccessor` manages remote data
- Cleanup: different `EdgeAccessor lazyness (@dgleich: take a look), unused methods, documentation...
- `TODO` placeholders for remote implementation
What's not done:
- RPC and data transfer
- how exactly remote errors are handled
- not sure if any MVCC Record info for remote data should be tracked
- WAL and RPC Deltas properly handled (Gleich working on extracting `Wal::Op`)
This implementation should not break single-node execution, and should provide good abstractions and placeholders for distributed. Once that's satisfied, it should land.
Reviewers: dgleich, buda, mislav.bradac
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: dgleich, pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1030
Summary:
In preparation for distributed storage we need to have labels/properties/edgetypes uniquely identifiable by their ids, which will be global in near future.
The old design has to be abandoned because it's not possible to keep track of global labels/properties/edgetypes while they are local pointers.
Reviewers: mislav.bradac, florijan
Reviewed By: florijan
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D993
Summary:
Remove name from GraphDb.
Take GraphDb in query test macros instead of accessor.
Add is_accepting_transactions flag to GraphDb.
Reviewers: mislav.bradac, florijan, mferencevic
Reviewed By: mislav.bradac
Subscribers: mferencevic, pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D940
Summary: Not strictly neccessary, but it's been itching me. It took an hour.
Reviewers: buda, mislav.bradac
Reviewed By: mislav.bradac
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D648
Summary:
There was only two files in dbms directory so I moved them to database
directory.
Reviewers: buda
Reviewed By: buda
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D540
