Summary:
Implementation of remote vertex and edge creation. This diff addresses
the creation API (`GraphDbAccessor::InsertEdge`,
`GraphDbAccessor::InsertRemoteVertex`) and the necessary RPC and
`RemoteCache` stuff.
What is missing for full remote creation support are
`query::plan::operator` changes that are expected to minor. Pushing this
diff as it's large enough, operator and end to end tests in the next.
Also, the naming of existing structures and files is confusing (update
refering to both updates and created, `results` used too often etc.). I
will address this too, but feel free to comment on bad naming.
Reviewers: dgleich, teon.banek, msantl
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1210
Summary:
Updates are supported, insertions and removals not in this diff. The
test is a bit overdesigned, it happens.
Reviewers: teon.banek, dgleich, msantl
Reviewed By: teon.banek
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1176
Summary:
Refactor in two ways. First, expose members without getters as we will
need most of them in distributed. And this was always the sensible thing
to do. Second, add storage type values to deltas. This is also a
sensible thing to do, and it will be very beneficial in distributed. We
didn't do it before because name<->value type mappings aren't guaranteed
to be the same after recovery. A task has been added to address this
(preserve mappings in durability).
Reviewers: dgleich, buda
Reviewed By: dgleich
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1167
Summary:
This is a proposal on how the WAL recovery process can be implemented so
that Deltas aren't accumulated, but instead applied in the same order
they are written to the WAL.
I *believe* that the only additional requirement on the system are
atomic transaction Begin/Commit/Abort. By atomic I mean that they are
present in the WAL in exactly the same ordering like in the transaciton
engine, to ensure the same commitability of original and recovery
transactions.
This could be a requirement for HA recovery. It is desirable that WAL
and HA log become the same thing, and the recovery process too.
Reviewers: mtomic, dgleich, mislav.bradac
Reviewed By: mislav.bradac
Subscribers: pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1068
Summary: Operations are moved and renamed from WAL to a separate file in preparation for HA and distributed storage.
Reviewers: florijan, mtomic, mislav.bradac
Reviewed By: florijan
Subscribers: mislav.bradac, pullbot
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.memgraph.io/D1034
