Rename SchemaResult to ShardOperationResult move it into a separate
header and add a new type to the underlying variant that indicates that
the vertex, the user would like to insert into the skip-list already
exist.
* Fix Explain queries
* Add Vertex/Edge accessor support for properties
* Fix projections
* Fix expansions to fetch destination vertex properties
* Fix improper use of ShardMap on bolt and replaced it with the ShardRequestManager
* Add NameToId mappers on ShardRequestManager
* Add e2e tests for operators
* Fix OPTIONAL MATCH
Because of the lexicographical sharding, the primary labels themselves are
acting as indexes. If a primary label is specified in a MATCH query we can
safely narrow the range of shards we have to scan through based on that label.
This PR introduces the necessary changes in order to achieve that.
This PR adds support for generating randomized workloads that will be executed
against a simulated cluster, as well as against a correctness model. Initially
this just generates ScanAll and CreateVertex requests, and anything that it
creates, it also inserts into a `std::set`, and when we do a ScanAll, it asserts
that we get the same number of requests back. This will become much more
sophisticated over time, but it's already hitting pay-dirt.
ScanVerticesrequest was not able to utilize filtering capabilities
before. With these modification it is now able to filter the scanned
vertices based on the filter_expressions field in the
ScanVerticesRequest message type.
The communication between the ShardRequestManager and the RsmClient
used to be direct. In this PR this changes into a future-based
communication type. The RsmClient stores state about the currently
processed future (either read or write request) and exposes blocking
and non-blocking functionality to obtain the filled future. The
ShardRequestManager -for now- will send of the set of requests present
in the ExecutionState and block on each of them until the requests are
completed or the set of paginated responses(caused by, for example the
batch-limit in ScanAll) are ready for the next round.
