tinycc/tests/tests2/27_sizeof.c

#include <stdio.h>

int main()
{
   char a;
   int b;
   double c;

   printf("%d\n", sizeof(a));
   printf("%d\n", sizeof(b));
   printf("%d\n", sizeof(c));

   printf("%d\n", sizeof(!a));

   return 0;
}

/* vim: set expandtab ts=4 sw=3 sts=3 tw=80 :*/
tests: Added numerous tests. The tests are taken almost verbatim from the open source project PicoC. It can be found at https://code.google.com/p/picoc/. The tests range from very simple/trivial ones to more complicated. My view is that the more tests the better. Without tests like this I was very reluctant to make any changes to tcc for the fear of breaking things. The tests pass on Win32, OSX, Linux x86 and x86_64. One or two tests fail on each platform due to differences in the runtime library. 2012-06-19 01:27:32 +08:00			`#include <stdio.h>`

			`int main()`
			`{`
			`char a;`
			`int b;`
			`double c;`

			`printf("%d\n", sizeof(a));`
			`printf("%d\n", sizeof(b));`
			`printf("%d\n", sizeof(c));`

tccgen.c: Try to make sizeof(!x) work. tests/tests2/27_sizeof.*: Add test. 2015-11-22 08:00:36 +08:00			`printf("%d\n", sizeof(!a));`

tests: Added numerous tests. The tests are taken almost verbatim from the open source project PicoC. It can be found at https://code.google.com/p/picoc/. The tests range from very simple/trivial ones to more complicated. My view is that the more tests the better. Without tests like this I was very reluctant to make any changes to tcc for the fear of breaking things. The tests pass on Win32, OSX, Linux x86 and x86_64. One or two tests fail on each platform due to differences in the runtime library. 2012-06-19 01:27:32 +08:00			`return 0;`
			`}`

			`/* vim: set expandtab ts=4 sw=3 sts=3 tw=80 :*/`