testable-mock/docs/zh-cn/doc/troubleshooting.md

94 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

自助问题排查
---
相比`Mockito`等由开发者手工放置Mock类的做法`TestableMock`使用方法名和参数类型匹配自动寻找需Mock的调用。这种机制在带来方便的同时也容易导致对“Mock究竟有没生效”的疑问。
若要排查Mock相关的问题只需在相应的**Mock容器类**上添加`@MockDiagnose`注解,并配置参数值为`LogLevel.ENABLE`在运行测试时就会打印出详细的Mock方法替换过程。例如
```java
class DemoTest {
@MockDiagnose(LogLevel.ENABLE)
public static class Mock {
...
}
}
```
输出日志示例如下:
```text
[DIAGNOSE] Handling test class com/alibaba/testable/demo/basic/DemoMockTest
[DIAGNOSE] Found 6 test cases
[DIAGNOSE] Handling mock class com/alibaba/testable/demo/basic/DemoMockTest$Mock
[DIAGNOSE] Found 8 mock methods
[DIAGNOSE] Handling source class com/alibaba/testable/demo/basic/DemoMock
[DIAGNOSE] Handling method <init>
[DIAGNOSE] Handling method newFunc
[DIAGNOSE] Line 19, mock method "createBlackBox" used
[DIAGNOSE] Handling method outerFunc
[DIAGNOSE] Line 27, mock method "innerFunc" used
[DIAGNOSE] Line 27, mock method "staticFunc" used
[DIAGNOSE] Handling method commonFunc
[DIAGNOSE] Line 34, mock method "trim" used
[DIAGNOSE] Line 34, mock method "sub" used
[DIAGNOSE] Line 34, mock method "startsWith" used
... ...
```
其中`Line XX, mock method "XXX" used`日志展示了被测类中所有发生了Mock替换的调用和相应代码行号。
简单排查方法:
- 若没有任何输出,请检查`pom.xml`或`build.gradle`配置是否正确引入了`TestableMock`依赖
- 若只输出了`Handling mock class`请检查Mock容器类的名称和位置是否符合规范
- 若只输出了`Handling mock class`和`Handling test class`,请检查被测类与测试类是否包路径相同,且名称为"被测类+Test",或者是否正确的使用了`@MockWith`注解
- 若输出了`Handling source class`以及`Handling method xxx`但预期的代码行位置没有发生Mock替换请继续检查Mock方法定义是否未与目标方法匹配
对于上述的最后一种情况预期Mock未生效可将日志级别提升到`LogLevel.VERBOSE`做进一步排查。例如:
```java
class DemoTest {
@MockDiagnose(LogLevel.VERBOSE)
public static class Mock {
...
}
}
```
再次执行单元测试此时将会打印出所有Mock方法的签名定义以及被测类中扫描到所有调用的实际方法签名
```text
[DIAGNOSE] Handling test class com/alibaba/testable/demo/basic/DemoMockTest
[VERBOSE] Test case "should_mock_new_object"
... ...
[VERBOSE] Test case "should_set_mock_context"
[DIAGNOSE] Found 6 test cases
[DIAGNOSE] Handling mock class com/alibaba/testable/demo/basic/DemoMockTest$Mock
[VERBOSE] Mock constructor "createBlackBox" as "com.alibaba.demo.basic.model.mock.BlackBox(java.lang.String)"
[VERBOSE] Mock method "innerFunc" as "com.alibaba.demo.basic.DemoMock::innerFunc(java.lang.String) : java.lang.String"
... ...
[VERBOSE] Mock method "callFromDifferentMethod" as "()Ljava/lang/String;"
[DIAGNOSE] Found 8 mock methods
[DIAGNOSE] Handling source class com/alibaba/testable/demo/basic/DemoMock
[DIAGNOSE] Handling method <init>
[VERBOSE] Line 13, constructing "java.lang.Object()"
[DIAGNOSE] Handling method newFunc
[VERBOSE] Line 19, constructing "com.alibaba.demo.basic.model.mock.BlackBox(java.lang.String)"
[DIAGNOSE] Line 19, mock method "createBlackBox" used
[VERBOSE] Line 19, invoking "com.alibaba.demo.basic.DemoMockTest$Mock::createBlackBox(java.lang.String) : com.alibaba.demo.basic.model.mock.BlackBox"
[VERBOSE] Line 20, invoking "com.alibaba.demo.basic.model.mock.BlackBox::get() : java.lang.String"
[DIAGNOSE] Handling method outerFunc
[VERBOSE] Line 27, constructing "java.lang.StringBuilder()"
[VERBOSE] Line 27, invoking "java.lang.StringBuilder::append(java.lang.String) : java.lang.StringBuilder"
[VERBOSE] Line 27, invoking "com.alibaba.demo.basic.DemoMock::innerFunc(java.lang.String) : java.lang.String"
[DIAGNOSE] Line 27, mock method "innerFunc" used
... ...
```
输出日志结构参考如下:
- `Mock constructor "<Mock方法名>" as "<方法签名>" for "<类型>"` 在测试类中扫描到的**Mock构造方法**及其签名
- `Mock method "<Mock方法名>" as "<方法签名>"` 在测试类中扫描到的**普通Mock方法**及其签名
- `Line XX, constructing "<类型>" as "<方法签名>"` 在被测类中扫描掉的**构造方法调用**及其签名
- `Line XX, invoking "<方法名>" as "<方法签名>"` 在被测类中扫描到的**成员方法调用**及其签名