diff --git a/KCP-Benchmark.md b/KCP-Benchmark.md
index ca77555..dea3bc2 100644
--- a/KCP-Benchmark.md
+++ b/KCP-Benchmark.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ enet: 10:51.21
 
 更详细的评测可以看这里：[benchmark](https://github.com/libinzhangyuan/reliable_udp_bench_mark/blob/master/bench_mark.md)，感谢 asio_kcp 的作者 zhangyuan 详细对比了 UDT, libenet和 kcp，并给出结论如下：
 
-* ASIO-KCP has good performace in wifi and phone network(3G, 4G).
+* ASIO-KCP has good performance in wifi and phone network(3G, 4G).
 * The kcp is the first choice for realtime pvp game. 
 * The lag is less than 1 second when network lag happen. 3 times better than enet when lag happen. 
 * The enet is a good choice if your game allow 2 second lag. 
@@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ enet: 10:51.21
 
 其他可以左右你选择的情况：
 
-* enet has the problem of lack of doc. And it has lots of functions that you may intrest.
-* kcp's doc is chinese.
-* Good thing is the function detail which is writen in code is english. And you can use asio_kcp which is a good wrap.
-* The kcp is a simple thing. You will write more code if you want more feature.
-* UDT has a perfect doc. UDT may has more bug than others as I feeling.
+* enet has the problem of lack of doc. And it has lots of functions that you may have interest in.
+* kcp's doc is in Chinese.
+* Good thing is the function detail which is written in code is English. And you can use asio_kcp which is a good wrap.
+* The kcp is a simple thing. You will write more code if you want more features.
+* UDT has a perfect doc. UDT may have more bug than others as I feeling.
 
 我当年主要测试了 KCP和 TCP/UDT的比较，扫了一眼 libenet觉得协议实现中规中矩，缺乏很多现代传输协议的技术，所以并没有详细测试。而 asio-kcp的作者同时给出了KCP/enet/udt三者的详细比较，为犹豫选择的人提供了更多指引。