Merge pull request #1 from twitter-forks/substitutions-in-includes

Substitutions in includes
This commit is contained in:
Ryan O'Neill 2015-08-06 13:45:11 -07:00
commit 48623a5c44
24 changed files with 76 additions and 91 deletions

1
.gitignore vendored
View File

@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
.classpath
.project
.cache
.DS_Store
.settings
.idea
.idea_modules

View File

@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ welcome!):
release)
16. push the "vX.Y.Z" tag
17. announce release, possibly wait for maven central to sync
first
first

View File

@ -1025,6 +1025,19 @@ Then the `${x}` in "foo.conf", which has been fixed up to
`${a.x}`, would evaluate to `42` rather than to `10`.
Substitution happens _after_ parsing the whole configuration.
Includes inside of lists use the list index as a path segment when
fixing up substitutions.
Example:
{
a : [ { include "foo.conf" } ]
a.0.x : 42
}
Since the `${x}` in "foo.conf" would be fixed up to `${a.0.x}' we
get our expected value of 42.
However, there are plenty of cases where the included file might
intend to refer to the application's root config. For example, to
get a value from a system property or from the reference

View File

@ -382,4 +382,4 @@ Thank you to contributors with commits since v1.2.1 tag:
`${foo}` syntax) without getting confused; just about anything
that makes conceptual sense should now work. Only inherently
circular config files should fail.
- some minor documentation fixes.
- some minor documentation fixes.

View File

@ -832,4 +832,4 @@ format.
#### Python port
* pyhocon https://github.com/chimpler/pyhocon
* pyhocon https://github.com/chimpler/pyhocon

View File

@ -252,4 +252,4 @@ public class ConfigBeanImpl {
return false;
}
}
}

View File

@ -339,4 +339,4 @@ final class ConfigDelayedMerge extends AbstractConfigValue implements Unmergeabl
sb.append("# ) end of unresolved merge\n");
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -233,4 +233,4 @@ final public class ConfigImplUtil {
}
return nameBuilder.toString();
}
}
}

View File

@ -278,4 +278,4 @@ final class ConfigNodeObject extends ConfigNodeComplexValue {
Path path = PathParser.parsePathNode(desiredPath, flavor).value();
return changeValueOnPath(path, null, flavor);
}
}
}

View File

@ -34,11 +34,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
final private ConfigOrigin baseOrigin;
final private LinkedList<Path> pathStack;
// the number of lists we are inside; this is used to detect the "cannot
// generate a reference to a list element" problem, and once we fix that
// problem we should be able to get rid of this variable.
int arrayCount;
ParseContext(ConfigSyntax flavor, ConfigOrigin origin, ConfigNodeRoot document,
FullIncluder includer, ConfigIncludeContext includeContext) {
lineNumber = 1;
@ -48,7 +43,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
this.includer = includer;
this.includeContext = includeContext;
this.pathStack = new LinkedList<Path>();
this.arrayCount = 0;
}
// merge a bunch of adjacent values into one
@ -95,8 +89,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
private AbstractConfigValue parseValue(AbstractConfigNodeValue n, List<String> comments) {
AbstractConfigValue v;
int startingArrayCount = arrayCount;
if (n instanceof ConfigNodeSimpleValue) {
v = ((ConfigNodeSimpleValue) n).value();
} else if (n instanceof ConfigNodeObject) {
@ -114,9 +106,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
comments.clear();
}
if (arrayCount != startingArrayCount)
throw new ConfigException.BugOrBroken("Bug in config parser: unbalanced array count");
return v;
}
@ -187,14 +176,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
throw new ConfigException.BugOrBroken("should not be reached");
}
// we really should make this work, but for now throwing an
// exception is better than producing an incorrect result.
// See https://github.com/typesafehub/config/issues/160
if (arrayCount > 0 && obj.resolveStatus() != ResolveStatus.RESOLVED)
throw parseError("Due to current limitations of the config parser, when an include statement is nested inside a list value, "
+ "${} substitutions inside the included file cannot be resolved correctly. Either move the include outside of the list value or "
+ "remove the ${} statements from the included file.");
if (!pathStack.isEmpty()) {
Path prefix = fullCurrentPath();
obj = obj.relativized(prefix);
@ -240,21 +221,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
// path must be on-stack while we parse the value
pathStack.push(path);
if (((ConfigNodeField) node).separator() == Tokens.PLUS_EQUALS) {
// we really should make this work, but for now throwing
// an exception is better than producing an incorrect
// result. See
// https://github.com/typesafehub/config/issues/160
if (arrayCount > 0)
throw parseError("Due to current limitations of the config parser, += does not work nested inside a list. "
+ "+= expands to a ${} substitution and the path in ${} cannot currently refer to list elements. "
+ "You might be able to move the += outside of the list and then refer to it from inside the list with ${}.");
// because we will put it in an array after the fact so
// we want this to be incremented during the parseValue
// below in order to throw the above exception.
arrayCount += 1;
}
AbstractConfigNodeValue valueNode;
AbstractConfigValue newValue;
@ -265,7 +231,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
newValue = parseValue(valueNode, comments);
if (((ConfigNodeField) node).separator() == Tokens.PLUS_EQUALS) {
arrayCount -= 1;
List<AbstractConfigValue> concat = new ArrayList<AbstractConfigValue>(2);
AbstractConfigValue previousRef = new ConfigReference(newValue.origin(),
@ -346,7 +311,6 @@ final class ConfigParser {
}
private SimpleConfigList parseArray(ConfigNodeArray n) {
arrayCount += 1;
SimpleConfigOrigin arrayOrigin = lineOrigin();
List<AbstractConfigValue> values = new ArrayList<AbstractConfigValue>();
@ -356,6 +320,8 @@ final class ConfigParser {
AbstractConfigValue v = null;
int index = 0;
for (AbstractConfigNode node : n.children()) {
if (node instanceof ConfigNodeComment) {
comments.add(((ConfigNodeComment) node).commentText());
@ -376,14 +342,16 @@ final class ConfigParser {
values.add(v.withOrigin(v.origin().appendComments(new ArrayList<String>(comments))));
comments.clear();
}
pathStack.push(new Path(Integer.toString(index)));
index ++;
v = parseValue((AbstractConfigNodeValue)node, comments);
pathStack.pop();
}
}
// There shouldn't be any comments at this point, but add them just in case
if (v != null) {
values.add(v.withOrigin(v.origin().appendComments(new ArrayList<String>(comments))));
}
arrayCount -= 1;
return new SimpleConfigList(arrayOrigin, values);
}

View File

@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ final class ResolveSource {
}
}
static private ValueWithPath findInObject(AbstractConfigObject obj, Path path) {
static private ValueWithPath findInObject(AbstractConfigValue obj, Path path) {
try {
// we'll fail if anything along the path can't
// be looked at without resolving.
@ -65,19 +65,34 @@ final class ResolveSource {
}
}
static private ValueWithPath findInObject(AbstractConfigObject obj, Path path, Node<Container> parents) {
static private ValueWithPath findInObject(AbstractConfigValue obj, Path path, Node<Container> parents) {
String key = path.first();
Path next = path.remainder();
if (ConfigImpl.traceSubstitutionsEnabled())
ConfigImpl.trace("*** looking up '" + key + "' in " + obj);
AbstractConfigValue v = obj.attemptPeekWithPartialResolve(key);
Node<Container> newParents = parents == null ? new Node<Container>(obj) : parents.prepend(obj);
AbstractConfigValue v = null;
Node<Container> newParents = null;
if (obj instanceof AbstractConfigObject) {
v = ((AbstractConfigObject) obj).attemptPeekWithPartialResolve(key);
newParents = parents == null ? new Node<Container>((AbstractConfigObject) obj) : parents.prepend((AbstractConfigObject) obj);
} else if (obj instanceof SimpleConfigList) {
int ix;
try {
ix = Integer.parseInt(key);
} catch(Exception e) {
throw new ConfigException.BadPath(key, "path for list must be numeric index");
}
v = ((SimpleConfigList) obj).get(ix);
newParents = parents == null ? new Node<Container>((SimpleConfigList) obj) : parents.prepend((SimpleConfigList) obj);
}
if (next == null) {
return new ValueWithPath(v, newParents);
} else {
if (v instanceof AbstractConfigObject) {
return findInObject((AbstractConfigObject) v, next, newParents);
if (v instanceof AbstractConfigObject || v instanceof SimpleConfigList) {
return findInObject(v, next, newParents);
} else {
return new ValueWithPath(null, newParents);
}

View File

@ -60,4 +60,4 @@ final class SimpleConfigDocument implements ConfigDocument {
public int hashCode() {
return render().hashCode();
}
}
}

View File

@ -692,4 +692,4 @@ final class Tokenizer {
"Does not make sense to remove items from token stream");
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -136,4 +136,4 @@ public class ArraysConfig {
public void setOfStringBean(List<StringsConfig> ofStringBean) {
this.ofStringBean = ofStringBean;
}
}
}

View File

@ -42,4 +42,4 @@ public class StringsConfig {
public String toString() {
return "StringsConfig(" + abcd + "," + yes + ")";
}
}
}

View File

@ -52,17 +52,7 @@
"ofConfigObject" : [${numbers}, ${booleans}, ${strings}],
"ofConfigValue" : [1, 2, "a"],
"ofDuration" : [1, 2h, 3 days],
"ofMemorySize" : [1024, 1M, 1G],
"ofStringBean" : [
{
abcd : "testAbcdOne"
yes : "testYesOne"
},
{
abcd : "testAbcdTwo"
yes : "testYesTwo"
}
]
"ofMemorySize" : [1024, 1M, 1G]
},
"bytes" : {
"kilobyte" : "1kB",

View File

@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
// The {} inside the [] is needed because
// just [ include ] means an array with the
// string "include" in it.
a = [ { include "test01.conf" } ]
a = [
{
include "test12.conf"
replace-key: "replaced"
}
]

View File

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
// This file is included by include-from-list.conf to verify that includes with substitutions work in arrays
replace-me: ${replace-key}

View File

@ -345,26 +345,19 @@ class ConcatenationTest extends TestUtils {
assertEquals(Seq(1, 2, 3), conf.getObjectList("x.a").asScala.toList.map(_.toConfig.getInt("b")))
}
// We would ideally make this case NOT throw an exception but we need to do some work
// to get there, see https://github.com/typesafehub/config/issues/160
@Test
def plusEqualsMultipleTimesNestedInArray() {
val e = intercept[ConfigException.Parse] {
val conf = parseConfig("""x = [ { a += 1, a += 2, a += 3 } ] """).resolve()
assertEquals(Seq(1, 2, 3), conf.getObjectList("x").asScala.toVector(0).toConfig.getIntList("a").asScala.toList)
}
assertTrue(e.getMessage.contains("limitation"))
val conf = parseConfig("""x = [ { a += 1, a += 2, a += 3 } ] """).resolve()
assertEquals(Seq(1, 2, 3), conf.getObjectList("x").asScala.toVector(0).toConfig.getIntList("a").asScala.toList)
}
// We would ideally make this case NOT throw an exception but we need to do some work
// to get there, see https://github.com/typesafehub/config/issues/160
@Test
def plusEqualsMultipleTimesNestedInPlusEquals() {
val e = intercept[ConfigException.Parse] {
val e = intercept[ConfigException.BugOrBroken] {
val conf = parseConfig("""x += { a += 1, a += 2, a += 3 } """).resolve()
assertEquals(Seq(1, 2, 3), conf.getObjectList("x").asScala.toVector(0).toConfig.getIntList("a").asScala.toList)
}
assertTrue(e.getMessage.contains("limitation"))
assertTrue(e.getMessage.contains("did not find"))
}
// from https://github.com/typesafehub/config/issues/177

View File

@ -801,6 +801,14 @@ class ConfParserTest extends TestUtils {
assertTrue("including basename URL doesn't load anything", conf.isEmpty())
}
@Test
def includeWithSubstitutionsFromList() {
val conf = ConfigFactory.parseString("include file(" + jsonQuotedResourceFile("include-from-list") + ")")
val resolved = conf.resolve()
assertEquals(resolved.getConfigList("a").get(0).getString("replace-me"), "replaced")
}
@Test
def acceptBOMStartingFile() {
// BOM at start of file should be ignored

View File

@ -209,4 +209,4 @@ class ConfigBeanFactoryTest extends TestUtils {
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -455,4 +455,4 @@ class ConfigDocumentTest extends TestUtils {
assertEquals("{ a : {\n \"a\" : 1,\n \"b\" : 2\n } }",
configDocument.withValue("a", configVal).render)
}
}
}

View File

@ -229,4 +229,4 @@ class ConfigNodeTest extends TestUtils {
assertEquals(finalText, newNode.render())
}
}
}

View File

@ -875,17 +875,6 @@ class PublicApiTest extends TestUtils {
assertTrue("wrong exception: " + e.getMessage, e.getMessage.contains("include statements nested"))
}
// We would ideally make this case NOT throw an exception but we need to do some work
// to get there, see https://github.com/typesafehub/config/issues/160
@Test
def detectIncludeFromList() {
val e = intercept[ConfigException.Parse] {
ConfigFactory.load("include-from-list.conf")
}
assertTrue("wrong exception: " + e.getMessage, e.getMessage.contains("limitation"))
}
@Test
def missingOverrideResourceFails() {
assertEquals("config.file is not set", null, System.getProperty("config.file"))