Roman Lebedev c7192c8a9a compare_bench.py: fixup benchmark_options. (#435) ... 2373382284 reworked parsing, and introduced a regression in handling of the optional options that should be passed to both of the benchmarks. Now, unless the *first* optional argument starts with '-', it would just complain about that argument: Unrecognized positional argument arguments: '['q']' which is wrong. However if some dummy arg like '-q' was passed first, it would then happily passthrough them all... This commit fixes benchmark_options behavior, by restoring original passthrough behavior for all the optional positional arguments.		2017-08-18 10:55:27 -07:00
..
gbench	Tooling: generate_difference_report(): show old/new for both values (#427)	2017-07-25 09:09:26 -07:00
compare_bench.py	compare_bench.py: fixup benchmark_options. (#435)	2017-08-18 10:55:27 -07:00