mirror of
https://github.com/google/benchmark.git
synced 2024-12-27 04:50:19 +08:00
d0fbf8ac23
This patch fixes #1306, by reducing the pinned instances of PerfCounters. The issue is caused by creating multiple pinned events in the same thread, doing so results in the Snapshot(PerfCounterValues* values) failing, and that's now discoverable. Creating multile pinned events is an unsupported behavior currently. The error would be detected at read() time, not perf_event_open() / iotcl() time. The unsupported benavior above is confirmed by Stephane Eranian @seranian, and he also pointed the dectection method. Finished this patch under the guidance of Mircea Trofin @mtrofin.
194 lines
6.6 KiB
C++
194 lines
6.6 KiB
C++
#include <thread>
|
|
|
|
#include "../src/perf_counters.h"
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
#ifndef GTEST_SKIP
|
|
struct MsgHandler {
|
|
void operator=(std::ostream&) {}
|
|
};
|
|
#define GTEST_SKIP() return MsgHandler() = std::cout
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
using benchmark::internal::PerfCounters;
|
|
using benchmark::internal::PerfCountersMeasurement;
|
|
using benchmark::internal::PerfCounterValues;
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
const char kGenericPerfEvent1[] = "CYCLES";
|
|
const char kGenericPerfEvent2[] = "BRANCHES";
|
|
const char kGenericPerfEvent3[] = "INSTRUCTIONS";
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, Init) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PerfCounters::Initialize(), PerfCounters::kSupported);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, OneCounter) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Performance counters not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1}).IsValid());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, NegativeTest) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PerfCounters::Create({}).IsValid());
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PerfCounters::Create({""}).IsValid());
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PerfCounters::Create({"not a counter name"}).IsValid());
|
|
{
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2,
|
|
kGenericPerfEvent3})
|
|
.IsValid());
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(
|
|
PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent2, "", kGenericPerfEvent1})
|
|
.IsValid());
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent3, "not a counter name",
|
|
kGenericPerfEvent1})
|
|
.IsValid());
|
|
{
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2,
|
|
kGenericPerfEvent3})
|
|
.IsValid());
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(
|
|
PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2,
|
|
kGenericPerfEvent3, "MISPREDICTED_BRANCH_RETIRED"})
|
|
.IsValid());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, Read1Counter) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
auto counters = PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1});
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.IsValid());
|
|
PerfCounterValues values1(1);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values1));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values1[0], 0);
|
|
PerfCounterValues values2(1);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values2));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[0], 0);
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[0], values1[0]);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, Read2Counters) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
auto counters =
|
|
PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent2});
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.IsValid());
|
|
PerfCounterValues values1(2);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values1));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values1[0], 0);
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values1[1], 0);
|
|
PerfCounterValues values2(2);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters.Snapshot(&values2));
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[0], 0);
|
|
EXPECT_GT(values2[1], 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, ReopenExistingCounters) {
|
|
// The test works (i.e. causes read to fail) for the assumptions
|
|
// about hardware capabilities (i.e. small number (3-4) hardware
|
|
// counters) at this date.
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
std::vector<PerfCounters> counters;
|
|
counters.reserve(6);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++)
|
|
counters.push_back(PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1}));
|
|
PerfCounterValues values(1);
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(counters[0].Snapshot(&values));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(counters[4].Snapshot(&values));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(counters[5].Snapshot(&values));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, CreateExistingMeasurements) {
|
|
// The test works (i.e. causes read to fail) for the assumptions
|
|
// about hardware capabilities (i.e. small number (3-4) hardware
|
|
// counters) at this date,
|
|
// the same as previous test ReopenExistingCounters.
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.\n";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
std::vector<PerfCountersMeasurement> perf_counter_measurements;
|
|
std::vector<std::pair<std::string, double>> measurements;
|
|
|
|
perf_counter_measurements.reserve(10);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
|
|
perf_counter_measurements.emplace_back(
|
|
std::vector<std::string>{kGenericPerfEvent1});
|
|
|
|
perf_counter_measurements[0].Start();
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(perf_counter_measurements[0].Stop(measurements));
|
|
|
|
measurements.clear();
|
|
perf_counter_measurements[8].Start();
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(perf_counter_measurements[8].Stop(measurements));
|
|
|
|
measurements.clear();
|
|
perf_counter_measurements[9].Start();
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(perf_counter_measurements[9].Stop(measurements));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
size_t do_work() {
|
|
size_t res = 0;
|
|
for (size_t i = 0; i < 100000000; ++i) res += i * i;
|
|
return res;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void measure(size_t threadcount, PerfCounterValues* values1,
|
|
PerfCounterValues* values2) {
|
|
BM_CHECK_NE(values1, nullptr);
|
|
BM_CHECK_NE(values2, nullptr);
|
|
std::vector<std::thread> threads(threadcount);
|
|
auto work = [&]() { BM_CHECK(do_work() > 1000); };
|
|
|
|
// We need to first set up the counters, then start the threads, so the
|
|
// threads would inherit the counters. But later, we need to first destroy the
|
|
// thread pool (so all the work finishes), then measure the counters. So the
|
|
// scopes overlap, and we need to explicitly control the scope of the
|
|
// threadpool.
|
|
auto counters =
|
|
PerfCounters::Create({kGenericPerfEvent1, kGenericPerfEvent3});
|
|
for (auto& t : threads) t = std::thread(work);
|
|
counters.Snapshot(values1);
|
|
for (auto& t : threads) t.join();
|
|
counters.Snapshot(values2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(PerfCountersTest, MultiThreaded) {
|
|
if (!PerfCounters::kSupported) {
|
|
GTEST_SKIP() << "Test skipped because libpfm is not supported.";
|
|
}
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PerfCounters::Initialize());
|
|
PerfCounterValues values1(2);
|
|
PerfCounterValues values2(2);
|
|
|
|
measure(2, &values1, &values2);
|
|
std::vector<double> D1{static_cast<double>(values2[0] - values1[0]),
|
|
static_cast<double>(values2[1] - values1[1])};
|
|
|
|
measure(4, &values1, &values2);
|
|
std::vector<double> D2{static_cast<double>(values2[0] - values1[0]),
|
|
static_cast<double>(values2[1] - values1[1])};
|
|
|
|
// Some extra work will happen on the main thread - like joining the threads
|
|
// - so the ratio won't be quite 2.0, but very close.
|
|
EXPECT_GE(D2[0], 1.9 * D1[0]);
|
|
EXPECT_GE(D2[1], 1.9 * D1[1]);
|
|
}
|
|
} // namespace
|