* Stop generating the export header and just check it in
* format the new header
* support windows
* format the header again
* avoid depending on internal macro
* ensure we define the right thing for windows static builds
* support older cmake
* and for tests
* Add possibility to ask for libbenchmark version number (#1004)
Add a header which holds the current major, minor, and
patch number of the library. The header is auto generated
by CMake.
* Do not generate unused functions (#1004)
* Add support for version number in bazel (#1004)
* Fix clang format #1004
* Fix more clang format problems (#1004)
* Use git version feature of cmake to determine current lib version
* Rename version_config header to version
* Bake git version into bazel build
* Use same input config header as in cmake for version.h
* Adapt the releasing.md to include versioning in bazel
Report all time numbers > 10 digits in scientific notation with
4 decimal places. This is necessary since only 10 digits
are currently reserved for the time columns (Time and CPU).
If exceeding 10 digits the output isnt properly aligned anymore.
* Introduce warmup phase to BenchmarkRunner (#1130)
In order to account for caching effects in user
benchmarks introduce a new command line option
"--benchmark_min_warmup_time"
which allows to specify an amount of time for
which the benchmark should be run before results
are meaningful.
* Adapt review suggestions regarding introduction of warmup phase (#1130)
* Fix BM_CHECK call in MinWarmUpTime (#1130)
* Fix comment on requirements of MinWarmUpTime (#1130)
* Add basic description of warmup phase mechanism to user guide (#1130)
* Add option to get the verbosity provided by commandline flag -v (#1330)
* replace assert with test failure
asserts are stripped out in non debug builds, and we run tests in non-debug CI bots.
* clang-format my own tweak
Co-authored-by: Dominic Hamon <dominichamon@users.noreply.github.com>
* Filter out benchmarks that start with "DISABLED_"
This could be slightly more elegant, in that the registration and the
benchmark definition names have to change. Ideally, we'd still register
without the DISABLED_ prefix and it would all "just work".
Fixes#1365
* add some documentation
* Add SetBenchmarkFilter() to set --benchmark_filter flag value in user code.
Use case: Provide an API to set this flag indepedence of the flag's implementation (ie., absl flag vs benchmark's flag facility)
* add test
* added notes on Initialize()
* Add option to set the default time unit globally
This commit introduces the `--benchmark_time_unit={ns|us|ms|s}` command line argument. The argument only affects benchmarks where the time unit is not set explicitly.
* Update AUTHORS and CONTRIBUTORS
* Test `SetDefaultTimeUnit`
* clang format
* Use `GetDefaultTimeUnit()` for initializing `TimeUnit` variables
* Review fixes
* Export functions
* Add comment
* introduce the possibility to customize the help printer function
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
* fixed naming convertion, and introduce the option function in the init method
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
* remove the macros to inject the helper function
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
* remove the default implementation, and introduce the nullprt
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
* Expose default display reporter creation in public API
this is useful when a custom reporter wants to fall back on the default
display reporter, but doesn't necessarily have access to the benchmark
library flag configuration.
* Make use of unique_ptr in the random interleaving test.
* clang-format
This patch fixes#1306, by reducing the pinned instances of
PerfCounters.
The issue is caused by creating multiple pinned events in the
same thread, doing so results in the Snapshot(PerfCounterValues* values)
failing, and that's now discoverable.
Creating multile pinned events is an unsupported behavior currently.
The error would be detected at read() time, not
perf_event_open() / iotcl() time.
The unsupported benavior above is confirmed by Stephane Eranian @seranian,
and he also pointed the dectection method.
Finished this patch under the guidance of Mircea Trofin @mtrofin.
* Address MSVC C4722 warning in tests
Some test paths deliberately exit, and it appears that the appropriate declspec
does not stop the compiler generating the C4722 warning as one might expect.
Per https://github.com/google/benchmark/issues/826#issuecomment-851995549
this commit ignores the warning for the affected call site.
* Fix up Formatting
* Fix up formatting issue on pragmas
* Fix up formatting issue on pragmas take 2
Co-authored-by: Staffan Tjernstrom <staffantj@users.noreply.github.com>
This applies a fix that used to exist in LLVM's downstream copy of
this library, from
948ce4e6ed.
I presume this warning isn't present if built with MSVC or Clang-cl,
but it's printed in MinGW mode. As the benchmark library adds
-Werror, this is a fatal error when builtin MinGW mode.
* Add Setup/Teardown option on Benchmark.
Motivations:
- feature parity with our internal library. (which has ~718 callers)
- more flexible than cordinating setup/teardown inside the benchmark routine.
* change Setup/Teardown callback type to raw function pointers
* add test file to cmake file
* move b.Teardown() up
* add const to param of Setup/Teardown callbacks
* fix comment and add doc to user_guide
* fix typo
* fix doc, fix test and add bindings to python/benchmark.cc
* fix binding again
* remove explicit C cast - that was wrong
* change policy to reference_internal
* try removing the bindinds ...
* clean up
* add more tests with repetitions and fixtures
* more comments
* init setup/teardown callbacks to NULL
* s/nullptr/NULL
* removed unused var
* change assertion on fixture_interaction::fixture_setup
* move NULL init to .cc file
* Fix un-initted error in test.
Found by -Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized
* Update spec_arg_test.cc
* additional change:
- Change the API on GetBenchmarkFilter and the `spec` to std::string because google C++ styleguide internally kind of discouraged using raw const char*
* [RFC] Adding API for setting/getting benchmark_filter flag?
This PR is more of a Request-for-comment - open to other ideas/suggestions as well.
Details:
This flag has different implementations(absl vs benchmark) and since the proposal to add absl as a dependency was rejected, it would be nice to have a reliable (and less hacky) way to access this flag internally.
(Actually, reading it isn't much a problem but setting it is).
Internally, we have a sizeable number users to use absl::SetFlags to set this flag. This will not work with benchmark-flags.
Another motivation is that not all users use the command line flag. Some prefer to programmatically set this value.
* fixed build errors
* fix lints again
* per discussion: add additional RunSpecifiedBenchmarks instead.
* add tests
* fix up tests
* clarify comment
* fix stray : in test
* more assertion in test
* add test file to test/CMakeLists.txt
* more test
* make test ISO C++ compliant
* fix up BUILD file to pass the flag
In #1238, one of MemoryManager's Stop methods was marked as deprecated
and this method is used in the same header. This change generated
-Wdeprecated-declarations warning on every file that includes
"benchmark.h". Use gcc's diagnostics to fix this warning.
WebRTC uses Google Benchmarks as a dependency and uses Chromium's build
infrastructure. Chromium is compiled using clang-cl on Windows, and the
-Wdeprecated-declarations warning is triggered. Because clang-cl accepts
gcc's diagnostic prama and defines the __clang__ macro,
using it can solve this issue.
Bug: webrtc:13280
* Introduce Coefficient of variation aggregate
I believe, it is much more useful / use to understand,
because it is already normalized by the mean,
so it is not affected by the duration of the benchmark,
unlike the standard deviation.
Example of real-world output:
```
raw.pixls.us-unique/GoPro/HERO6 Black$ ~/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench GOPR9172.GPR --benchmark_repetitions=27 --benchmark_display_aggregates_only=true --benchmark_counters_tabular=true
2021-09-03T18:05:56+03:00
Running /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Run on (32 X 3596.16 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
L1 Data 32 KiB (x16)
L1 Instruction 32 KiB (x16)
L2 Unified 512 KiB (x16)
L3 Unified 32768 KiB (x2)
Load Average: 7.00, 2.99, 1.85
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations CPUTime,s CPUTime/WallTime Pixels Pixels/CPUTime Pixels/WallTime Raws/CPUTime Raws/WallTime WallTime,s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOPR9172.GPR/threads:32/process_time/real_time_mean 11.1 ms 353 ms 27 0.353122 31.9473 12M 33.9879M 1085.84M 2.83232 90.4864 0.0110535
GOPR9172.GPR/threads:32/process_time/real_time_median 11.0 ms 352 ms 27 0.351696 31.9599 12M 34.1203M 1090.11M 2.84336 90.8425 0.0110081
GOPR9172.GPR/threads:32/process_time/real_time_stddev 0.159 ms 4.60 ms 27 4.59539m 0.0462064 0 426.371k 14.9631M 0.0355309 1.24692 158.944u
GOPR9172.GPR/threads:32/process_time/real_time_cv 1.44 % 1.30 % 27 0.0130136 1.44633m 0 0.0125448 0.0137802 0.0125448 0.0137802 0.0143795
```
Fixes https://github.com/google/benchmark/issues/1146
* Be consistent, it's CV, not 'rel std dev'
* Statistics: add support for percentage unit in addition to time
I think, `stddev` statistic is useful, but confusing.
What does it mean if `stddev` of `1ms` is reported?
Is that good or bad? If the `median` is `1s`,
then that means that the measurements are pretty noise-less.
And what about `stddev` of `100ms` is reported?
If the `median` is `1s` - awful, if the `median` is `10s` - good.
And hurray, there is just the statistic that we need:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_variation
But, naturally, that produces a value in percents,
but the statistics are currently hardcoded to produce time.
So this refactors thinkgs a bit, and allows a percentage unit for statistics.
I'm not sure whether or not `benchmark` would be okay
with adding this `RSD` statistic by default,
but regales, that is a separate patch.
Refs. https://github.com/google/benchmark/issues/1146
* Address review notes
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate the direct access to these fields.
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate the direct access to these fields.
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
* [benchmark] Introduce accessors for currently public data members `threads` and `thread_index`
Also deprecate direct access to `.thread_index` and make threads a private field
Motivations:
Our internal library provides accessors for those fields because the styleguide disalows accessing classes' data members directly (even if they're const).
There has been a discussion to simply move internal library to make its fields public similarly to the OSS version here, however, the concern is that these kinds of direct access would prevent many types of future design changes (eg how/whether the values would be stored in the data member)
I think the concensus in the end is that we'd change the external library for this case.
AFAIK, there are three important third_party users that we'd need to migrate: tcmalloc, abseil and tensorflow.
Please let me know if I'm missing anyone else.
Both `.` and `<empty>` already means "run all benchmarks" here, as commented on this flag's declaration (and below around line 448-449).
So this is a NFC.
On the other hand, this help internally because internally, if the flag is empty (or if it's not a specified by a binary), we don't call the RunSpecifiedBenchmarks.
There is still a difference in what <empty> means internally (runs no benchmarks) and externally (runs all benchmarks).
But we can work around this.
* Remove `min` with dead path.
When `isSignificant` is false, the smallest value `multiplier` can
approach is 14. Thus, min(10, multiplier) will always return 10.
Addresses part one of #1205.
* Remove always false condition.
1. `multiplier <= 1.0` implies `i.seconds >= min_time * 1.4`
2. By (1), `isSignficant` is true because `i.seconds > min_time * 1.4` implies `i.seconds > min_time` implies that `i.seconds / minTime > 1 > 0.1`. Thus, the ternary maintains the same multiplier value.
3. `ShouldReportResults` is always called before `PredictNumItersNeeded`, if `i.seconds >= min_time` then the loop is broken and `PredictNumItersNeeded` is never called.
4. 1 and 3 together imply that `multiplier <= 1.0` is never true.
Addresses part 2 of #1205.
This can be used together with ArgsProduct() to allow multiple ranges
with different multipliers and mixing dense and sparse ranges.
Example:
BENCHMARK(MyTest)->ArgsProduct({
CreateRange(0, 1024, /*multi=*/32),
CreateRange(0, 100, /*multi=*/4),
CreateDenseRange(0, 4, /*step=*/1)
});
Co-authored-by: Jen-yee Hong <pcmantw@google.com>
Inspired by the original implementation by Hai Huang @haih-g
from https://github.com/google/benchmark/pull/1105.
The original implementation had design deficiencies that
weren't really addressable without redesign, so it was reverted.
In essence, the original implementation consisted of two separateable parts:
* reducing the amount time each repetition is run for, and symmetrically increasing repetition count
* running the repetitions in random order
While it worked fine for the usual case, it broke down when user would specify repetitions
(it would completely ignore that request), or specified per-repetition min time (while it would
still adjust the repetition count, it would not adjust the per-repetition time,
leading to much greater run times)
Here, like i was originally suggesting in the original review, i'm separating the features,
and only dealing with a single one - running repetitions in random order.
Now that the runs/repetitions are no longer in-order, the tooling may wish to sort the output,
and indeed `compare.py` has been updated to do that: #1168.
Currently the lifetime of a single BenchmarkRunner is constrained
to a RunBenchmark(), but that will have to change for interleaved
benchmark execution, because we'll need to keep it around to not
forget how much repetitions of an instance we've done.
While the current variant works, it assumes that all the instances of
a single family will be run together, with nothing inbetween them.
Naturally, that won't work once the runs may be interleaved.
Much like it makes sense to enumerate all the families,
it makes sense to enumerate stuff within families.
Alternatively, we could have a global instance index,
but i'm not sure why that would be better.
This will be useful when the benchmarks are run not in order,
for the tools to sort the results properly.
It may be useful for those wishing to further post-process JSON results,
but it is mainly geared towards better support for run interleaving,
where results from the same family may not be close-by in the JSON.
While we won't be able to do much about that for outputs,
the tools can and perhaps should reorder the results to that
at least in their output they are in proper order, not run order.
Note that this only counts the families that were filtered-in,
so if e.g. there were three families, and we filtered-out
the second one, the two families (which were first and third)
will have family indexes 0 and 1.
* Implementation of random interleaving. See
http://github.com/google/benchmark/issues/1051 for the feature requests.
Committer: Hai Huang (http://github.com/haih-g)
On branch fr-1051
Changes to be committed:
modified: include/benchmark/benchmark.h
modified: src/benchmark.cc
new file: src/benchmark_adjust_repetitions.cc
new file: src/benchmark_adjust_repetitions.h
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
modified: src/benchmark_register.cc
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
modified: src/benchmark_runner.h
modified: test/CMakeLists.txt
new file: test/benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest.cc
* Fix benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest.cc for fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
modified: test/benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest.cc
* Fix macos build for fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
* Fix macos and windows build for fr-1051.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
* Fix benchmark_random_interleaving_test.cc for macos and windows in fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: test/benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest.cc
* Fix int type benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest for macos in fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: test/benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest.cc
* Address dominichamon's comments 03/29 for fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
modified: test/benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest.cc
* Address dominichamon's comment on default min_time / repetitions for fr-1051.
Also change sentinel of random_interleaving_repetitions to -1. Hopefully it
fixes the failures on Windows.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
* Fix windows test failures for fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
* Add license blurb for fr-1051.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_adjust_repetitions.cc
modified: src/benchmark_adjust_repetitions.h
* Switch to std::shuffle() for fr-1105.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
* Change to 1e-9 in fr-1105
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_adjust_repetitions.cc
* Fix broken build caused by bad merge for fr-1105.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
* Fix build breakage for fr-1051.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
modified: src/benchmark_register.cc
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
* Print out reports as they come in if random interleaving is disabled (fr-1051)
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
* size_t, int64_t --> int in benchmark_runner for fr-1051.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
modified: src/benchmark_runner.h
* Address comments from dominichamon for fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
modified: src/benchmark_adjust_repetitions.cc
modified: src/benchmark_adjust_repetitions.h
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
modified: test/benchmark_random_interleaving_gtest.cc
* benchmar_indices --> size_t to make CI pass: fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark.cc
* Fix min_time not initialized issue for fr-1051.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
* min_time --> MinTime in fr-1051.
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.cc
modified: src/benchmark_api_internal.h
modified: src/benchmark_runner.cc
* Add doc for random interleaving for fr-1051
Committer: Hai Huang <haih@google.com>
On branch fr-1051
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/fr-1051'.
Changes to be committed:
modified: README.md
new file: docs/random_interleaving.md
Co-authored-by: Dominic Hamon <dominichamon@users.noreply.github.com>
This also fixes#1135. Because StrSplit was returning a vector with an
empty string, it was treated by PerfCounters::Create as a legitimate ask
for setting up a counter with that name. The empty vector is understood
by PerfCounters as "just return NoCounters()".
* Add API to benchmark allowing for custom context to be added
Fixes#525
* add docs
* Add context flag output to JSON reporter
* Plumb everything into the global context.
* Add googletests for custom context
* update docs with duplicate key behaviour
* Add `benchmark_context` flag that allows per-run custom context.
Add support for key-value flags in general.
Added test for key-value flags.
Added `benchmark_context` flag.
Output content of `benchmark_context` to base reporter.
Solves the first part of #525.
* Docs and better help
* Support optional, user-directed collection of performance counters
The patch allows an engineer wishing to drill into the root causes
of a regression, for example. Currently, only single threaded runs
are supported. The feature is a build-time opt in, and then a runtime
opt in.
The engineer may run the benchmark executable, passing a list of
performance counter names (using libpfm's naming scheme) at the
command line. The counter values will then be collected and reported
back as UserCounters.
This is different from #240 in that it is a benchmark user opt-in, and
the counter collection is transparent to the benchmark.
Currently, this is only supported on platforms where libpfm is
supported.
libpfm: http://perfmon2.sourceforge.net/
* 'Use' values param in Snapshot when BENCHMARK_OS_WINDOWS
This is to avoid unused parameter warning-as-error
* Added missing include for <vector> in perf_counters.cc
* Moved doc to docs
* Added license blurbs
Currently, i get:
```
Run on (32 X 7326.56 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
L1 Data 32 KiB (x16)
L1 Instruction 32 KiB (x16)
L2 Unified 512 KiB (x16)
L3 Unified 32768 KiB (x2)
```
which seems mostly right, except that the frequency is rather bogus.
Yes, i guess the CPU could theoretically achieve that,
but i have 3.6GHz configured, and scaling disabled.
So we clearly read the wrong thing.
With this fix, i now get the expected
```
Run on (32 X 3598.53 MHz CPU s)
CPU Caches:
L1 Data 32 KiB (x16)
L1 Instruction 32 KiB (x16)
L2 Unified 512 KiB (x16)
L3 Unified 32768 KiB (x2)
```
Use the benchmark's reported iteration count when estimating
iterations for the next repetition, rather than the requested
iteration count. When the benchmark uses KeepRunningBatch the actual
iteration count can be larger than the one the runner requested.
Prior to this fix the runner was underestimating the next iteration
count, sometimes significantly so. Consider the case of a benchmark
using a batch size of 1024. Prior to this change, the benchmark
runner would attempt iteration counts 1, 10, 100 and 1000, yet the
benchmark itself would do the same amount of work each time: a single
batch of 1024 iterations. The discrepancy could also contribute to
estimation errors once the benchmark time reached 10% of the target.
For example, if the very first batch of 1024 iterations reached 10% of
benchmark_min_min time, the runner would attempt to scale that to 100%
from a basis of one iteration rather than 1024.
This bug was particularly noticeable in benchmarks with large batch
sizes, especially when the benchmark also had slow set up or tear down
phases.
With this fix in place it is possible to use KeepRunningBatch to
achieve a kind of "minimum iteration count" feature by using a larger
fixed batch size. For example, a benchmark may build a map of 500K
elements and test a "find" operation. There is no point in running
"find" just 1, 10, 100, etc., times. The benchmark can now pick a
batch size of something like 10K, and the runner will arrive at the
final max iteration count with in noticeably fewer repetitions.
When building with gcc TSan on, and in Debug mode, we see a warning
like:
benchmark/src/timers.cc: In function ‘std::string benchmark::LocalDateTimeString()’:
src/timers.cc:241:15: warning: ‘char* strncat(char*, const char*, size_t)’ output may be truncated copying 108 bytes from a string of length 127 [-Wstringop-truncation]
241 | std::strncat(storage, tz_offset, sizeof(storage) - timestamp_len - 1);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While this is essentially a false positive (we never expect
the number of bytes in tz_offset to be too large), the compiler can't
actually tell that. Shrink the size of tz_offset to a smaller, but still safe
size to eliminate this warning.
Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@openrobotics.org>
