From 15e051b68c3f69f1950de1b048dae90ccadc84ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Peng Hailin," <unisko@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 14:30:56 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Update Ch20

---
 hello/src/main.rs                               |  4 +++-
 ...oject_Building_a_Multithreaded_Web_Server.md | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hello/src/main.rs b/hello/src/main.rs
index e134057..5087a91 100644
--- a/hello/src/main.rs
+++ b/hello/src/main.rs
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ fn main() {
     for stream in listener.incoming() {
         let stream = stream.unwrap();
 
-        handle_conn(stream);
+        thread::spawn(|| {
+            handle_conn(stream);
+        });
     }
 }
 
diff --git a/src/Ch20_Final_Project_Building_a_Multithreaded_Web_Server.md b/src/Ch20_Final_Project_Building_a_Multithreaded_Web_Server.md
index 82cfada..b6ea69f 100644
--- a/src/Ch20_Final_Project_Building_a_Multithreaded_Web_Server.md
+++ b/src/Ch20_Final_Project_Building_a_Multithreaded_Web_Server.md
@@ -547,5 +547,22 @@ fn handle_conn(mut stream: TcpStream) {
 
 **Spawning a Thread for Each Request**
 
+首先，咱们来探讨一下若咱们的代码给每隔连接创建一个新线程，他看起来会怎样。正如早先所提到的，由于潜在地生成无限数目线程的那些问题，这样做不是咱们的最终计划，但其为首先得到一个运作多线程服务器的起点。随后咱们将添加线程池作为一项改进，且将这两种方案进行对比将更容易一些。下面清单 20-11 给出了把 `main` 构造为于那个 `for` 循环里，生成一个新线程来处理每个 TCP 流的一些修改。
 
+文件名：`src/main.rs`
 
+```rust
+fn main() {
+    let listener = TcpListener::bind("127.0.0.1:7878").unwrap();
+
+    for stream in listener.incoming() {
+        let stream = stream.unwrap();
+
+        thread::spawn(|| {
+            handle_conn(stream);
+        });
+    }
+}
+```
+
+*清单 20-11：为每个 TCP 流生成一个新线程*