mirror of
https://github.com/eng-practices/eng-practices.git
synced 2024-12-21 20:30:15 +08:00
Internal change
PiperOrigin-RevId: 267425726
This commit is contained in:
parent
78ddc9e067
commit
47ea81efde
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Writing good CL descriptions
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
A CL description is a public record of **what** change is being made and **why**
|
||||
it was made. It will become a permanent part of our version control history, and
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# How to handle reviewer comments
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
When you've sent a CL out for review, it's likely that your reviewer will
|
||||
respond with several comments on your CL. Here are some useful things to know
|
||||
|
@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
||||
# The CL author's guide to getting through code review
|
||||
|
||||
go/cl-author
|
||||
|
||||
The pages in this section contain best practices for developers going through
|
||||
code review. These guidelines should help you get through reviews faster and
|
||||
with higher-quality results. You don't have to read them all, but they are
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Small CLs
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Write Small CLs? {#why}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Sometimes there are emergency CLs that must pass through the entire code review
|
||||
process as quickly as
|
||||
possible.
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## What Is An Emergency? {#what}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ At Google we use code review to maintain the quality of our code and products.
|
||||
This documentation is the canonical description of Google's code review
|
||||
processes and policies.
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This page is an overview of our code review process. There are two other large
|
||||
documents that are a part of this guide:
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# How to write code review comments
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
|
||||
# How to do a code review
|
||||
|
||||
go/code-reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
The pages in this section contain recommendations on the best way to do code
|
||||
reviews, based on long experience. All together they represent one complete
|
||||
document, broken up into many separate sections. You don't have to read them
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# What to look for in a code review
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Always make sure to take into account
|
||||
[The Standard of Code Review](standard.md) when considering each of these
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Navigating a CL in review
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Handling pushback in code reviews
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Sometimes a developer will push back on a code review. Either they will disagree
|
||||
with your suggestion or they will complain that you are being too strict in
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Speed of Code Reviews
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Should Code Reviews Be Fast? {#why}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# The Standard of Code Review
|
||||
|
||||
[TOC]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The primary purpose of code review is to make sure that the overall
|
||||
code health of Google's code
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user