mirror of
https://github.com/gnu4cn/ccna60d.git
synced 2024-05-21 04:55:00 +08:00
update
This commit is contained in:
parent
a95a1f9d81
commit
a43b3aa5f5
31
d36-EIGRP.md
31
d36-EIGRP.md
@ -1754,3 +1754,34 @@ P 10.1.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 128256
|
||||
via Connected, Loopback1
|
||||
...
|
||||
[Truncated Output]
|
||||
|
||||
在路由表中,汇总路由是直接连接到`Null0`接口上的。该路由有着一个默认为5的管理距离数值(a default administrative distance value of 5)。下面的输出对此进行了演示:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
R1#show ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
|
||||
Routing entry for 10.0.0.0/8
|
||||
Known via “eigrp 150”, distance 5, metric 128256, type internal
|
||||
Redistributing via eigrp 150
|
||||
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
|
||||
* directly connected, via Null0
|
||||
Route metric is 128256, traffic share count is 1
|
||||
Total delay is 5000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 10000000 Kbit
|
||||
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1514 bytes
|
||||
Loading 1/255, Hops 0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
在EIGRP完成自动汇总时,路由器将对汇总路由进行通过,从而抑制了那些更为具体路由的通告(When EIGRP performs automatic summarisation, the router advertises the summary route and suppresses the more specific routes)。换句话说,在汇总路由得以通告时,那些更为具体的前缀,在发往EIGRP邻居的更新中就被省略了(the more specific prefixes are suppressed in updates to EIGRP neighbours)。这一点可通过查看路由器R2上的路由表,加以验证,如下所示:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
R2#show ip route eigrp
|
||||
D 10.0.0.0/8 [90/2298856] via 150.1.1.1, 00:29:05, Serial0/0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
这种默认行为在一些基本的网络,比如上图36.15中演示的网络中,运作不错。但其可能在不连续网络,那种由两个分离的主要网络所组成的网络中,如下图36.16中所演示的,有着不利影响(However, it can have an adverse impact in a discontiguous network, which comprises a major network that separates another major network):
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
*图 36.16 -- 不连续网络*
|
||||
|
||||
参考图36.16中所演示的图例,一个主要的`150.1.0.0/16`网络将这里的两个主要的`10.0.0.0/8`网络分开了。在开启自动汇总时,路由器R1与R2将把`10.1.1.0/24`
|
||||
|
||||
> **译者注**:本小节及前面小节中所提到的主要网络(the major network),是指按网络大类分的网络,也就是A、B、C、D及E类网络。
|
||||
|
BIN
images/3616.png
Normal file
BIN
images/3616.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After ![]() (image error) Size: 147 KiB |
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user