mirror of
https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git
synced 2025-01-04 22:00:34 +08:00
31 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
31 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
Senior researchers analyzed LibreOffice with interesting conclusions
|
||
================================================================================
|
||
Users, editors, state departments, teams and city administrations are enjoying [LibreOffice][1], free open-source office suite proving itself a clear success across the globe with more and more adoptions, more and more positive feedback.
|
||
|
||
While the users perceive LibreOffice as no-compromise and powerful, it seems that serious researchers have also found and described LibreOffice as a true success, as in the case of the "**Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork: How and why has the LibreOffice project evolved?**" document, too.
|
||
|
||
Essentially, "Sustainability of Open Source software communities beyond a fork: How and why has the LibreOffice project evolved?" is a research document [focused][2] on LibreOffice and its components, ranging from status to public perception, future capabilities, ability to attract supporters and contributors.
|
||
|
||
The conclusions of the mentioned document, while natural, talk about LibreOffice as a success on all fronts, conclusions such as:
|
||
|
||
- "The LibreOffice project, which was forked from the OpenOffice.org project, shows no sign of
|
||
- long-term decline"
|
||
- "LibreOffice has attracted the long-term and most active committers in OpenOffice.org"
|
||
- "Open Source communities can outlive Open Source software projects"
|
||
- "LibreOffice is perceived by its community as supportive, diversified, and independent"
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The serious 60-pages-long document (available for download on [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121213002744/pdfft...][3]) presents LibreOffice as detailed, being an in-depth accurate analysis of the robust office suite, document written by senior researchers from the University of Skövde’s Informatics Research Centre.
|
||
|
||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
via: http://iloveubuntu.net/senior-researchers-analyzed-libreoffice-interesting-conclusions
|
||
|
||
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) 校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||
|
||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译，[Linux中国](http://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||
|
||
[1]:http://www.libreoffice.org/
|
||
[2]:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121213002744
|
||
[3]:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121213002744/pdfft?md5=4b986a117fb06cc127b854cb5f622bec&pid=1-s2.0-S0164121213002744-main.pdf |