mirror of
https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git
synced 2025-01-25 23:11:02 +08:00
Translated by qhwdw
This commit is contained in:
qhwdw
parent
bbbfd8b9ec
commit
fcf83a9016
@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
|
||||
Translating by qhwdw
|
||||
LKRG: Linux to Get a Loadable Kernel Module for Runtime Integrity Checking
|
||||
======
|
||||
![LKRG logo][1]
|
||||
|
||||
Members of the open source community are working on a new security-focused project for the Linux kernel. Named Linux Kernel Runtime Guard (LKRG), this is a loadable kernel module that will perform runtime integrity checking of the Linux kernel.
|
||||
|
||||
Its purpose is to detect exploitation attempts for known and unknwon security vulnerabilities against the Linux kernel and attempt to block attacks.
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG will also detect privilege escalation for running processes, and kill the running process before the exploit code runs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Project under development since 2011. First versions released.
|
||||
|
||||
Since the project is in such early development, current versions of LKRG will only report kernel integrity violations via kernel messages, but a full exploit mitigation system will be deployed as the system matures.
|
||||
|
||||
Work on this project started in 2011, and LKRG has gone through a "re-development" phase, as LKRG member Alexander Peslyak described the process.
|
||||
|
||||
The first public version of LKRG —LKRG v0.0— is now live and available for download on [this page][2]. A wiki is also available [here][3], and a [Patreon page][4] for supporting the project has also been set up.
|
||||
|
||||
While LKRG will remain an open source project, LKRG maintainers also have plans for an LKRG Pro version that will include distro-specific LKRG builds and support for the detection of specific exploits, such as container escapes. The team plans to use the funds from LKRG Pro to fund the rest of the project.
|
||||
|
||||
### LKRG is a kernel module. Not a patch.
|
||||
|
||||
A similar project is Additional Kernel Observer (AKO), but AKO differs from LKRG because it's a kernel load-on module and not a patch. The LKRG team chose to create a kernel module because patching the kernel has a direct impact on the security, system stability, and performance.
|
||||
|
||||
By offering a kernel module this also makes LKRG easier to deploy on a per-system basis without having to tinker with core kernel code, a very complicated and error-prone process.
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG kernel modules are currently available for main Linux distros such as RHEL7, OpenVZ 7, Virtuozzo 7, and Ubuntu 16.04 to latest mainlines.
|
||||
|
||||
### Not a perfect solution
|
||||
|
||||
But LKRG's creators are warning users not to consider their tool as unbreakable and 100% secure. They said LKRG is "bypassable by design," and only provides "security through diversity."
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
While LKRG defeats many pre-existing exploits of Linux kernel vulnerabilities, and will likely defeat many future exploits (including of yet unknown vulnerabilities) that do not specifically attempt to bypass LKRG, it is bypassable by design (albeit sometimes at the expense of more complicated and/or less reliable exploits). Thus, it can be said that LKRG provides security through diversity, much like running an uncommon OS kernel would, yet without the usability drawbacks of actually running an uncommon OS.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG is similar to Windows-based antivirus software, which also works at the kernel level to detect exploits and malware. Nonetheless, the LKRG team says their product is much safer then antivirus and other endpoint security software because it has a much smaller codebase, hence a smaller footprint for introducing new bugs and vulnerabilities at the kernel level.
|
||||
|
||||
### Current LKRG version adds a 6.5% performance dip
|
||||
|
||||
Peslyak says LKRG is most suited for Linux machines that can't be rebooted right in the aftermath of a security flaw to patch the kernel. LKRG allows owners to continue to run the machine with a security measure in place until patches for critical vulnerabilities can be tested and deployed during planned maintenance windows.
|
||||
|
||||
Tests showed that installing LKRG v0.0 added a 6.5% performance impact, but Peslyak says this will be reduced as development moves forward.
|
||||
|
||||
Tests also showed that LKRG detected exploitation attempts for CVE-2014-9322 (BadIRET), CVE-2017-5123 (waitid(2) missing access_ok), and CVE-2017-6074 (use-after-free in DCCP protocol), but failed to detect CVE-2016-5195 (Dirty COW). The team said LKRG failed to spot the Dirty COW privilege escalation because of the previously mentioned "bypassable by design" strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
In case of Dirty COW the LKRG "bypass" happened due to the nature of the bug and this being the way to exploit it, it's also a way for future exploits to bypass LKRG by similarly directly targeting userspace. It remains to be seen whether such exploits become common (unlikely unless LKRG or similar become popular?) and what (negative?) effect on their reliability this will have (for kernel vulnerabilities where directly targeting the userspace isn't essential and possibly not straightforward).
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
via: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/linux/lkrg-linux-to-get-a-loadable-kernel-module-for-runtime-integrity-checking/
|
||||
|
||||
作者：[Catalin Cimpanu][a]
|
||||
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
|
||||
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||
|
||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||
|
||||
[a]:https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/author/catalin-cimpanu/
|
||||
[1]:https://www.bleepstatic.com/content/posts/2018/02/04/LKRG-logo.png
|
||||
[2]:http://www.openwall.com/lkrg/
|
||||
[3]:http://openwall.info/wiki/p_lkrg/Main
|
||||
[4]:https://www.patreon.com/p_lkrg
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
LKRG：Linux 的适用于运行时完整性检查的可加载内核模块
|
||||
======
|
||||
![LKRG logo][1]
|
||||
|
||||
开源社区的成员正在致力于一个 Linux 内核的新项目，它可以让内核更安全。命名为 Linux 内核运行时防护（Linux Kernel Runtime Guard，简称：LKRG），它是一个在 Linux 内核执行运行时完整性检查时的可加载内核模块。
|
||||
|
||||
它的用途是检测对 Linux 内核的已知的或未知的安全漏洞利用企图，以及去阻止这种攻击企图。
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG 也可以检测正在运行的进程的提权行为，在漏洞利用代码运行之前杀掉这个运行进程。
|
||||
|
||||
### 这个项目从 2011 年开始开发以来，首个版本已经发布。
|
||||
|
||||
因为这个项目开发的较早，LKRG 的当前版本仅仅是通过内核消息去报告违反内核完整性的行为，但是随着这个项目的成熟，一个完整的漏洞利用缓减系统将会部署。
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG 的成员 Alexander Peslyak 解释说，这个项目从 2011 年启动，并且 LKRG 已经经历了“预开发"阶段。
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG 的首个公开版本是 — LKRG v0.0 — 它现在可以从 [这个页面][2] 下载使用。[这里][3] 是这个项目的维基，为支持这个项目，它也有一个 [Patreon 页面][4]。
|
||||
|
||||
虽然 LKRG 还是一个开源项目，LKRG 的维护者也计划做一个 LKRG Pro 版本，这个版本将包含一个专用的 LKRG 发行版，它将支持对特定漏洞利用的检测，比如，容器泄漏。开发团队计划从 LKRG Pro 基金中提取部分资金用于保证项目的剩余工作。
|
||||
|
||||
### LKRG 是一个内核模块而不是一个补丁。
|
||||
|
||||
一个类似的项目是去增加一个内核监视功能（AKO），但是 LKRG 与 AKO 是不一样的，因为 LKRG 是一个内核加载模式而不是一个补丁。LKRG 开发团队决定将它设计为一个内核模块是因为，在内核上打补丁对安全性、系统稳定性以及性能都有很直接的影响。
|
||||
|
||||
而作为内核模块的方式，可以在每个系统上更容易部署去 LKRG，而不必去修改核心的内核代码，修改核心的内核代码非常复杂并且很容易出错。
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG 内核模块在目前主流的 Linux 发行版上都可以使用，比如，RHEL7、OpenVZ 7、Virtuozzo 7、以及 Ubuntu 16.04 到最新的主线版本。
|
||||
|
||||
### 它并非是一个完美的解决方案
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG 的创建者警告用户，他们并不认为 LKRG 是一个完美的解决方案，它**提供不了**坚不可摧和 100% 的安全。他们说，LKRG 是 "设计为**可旁通**的"，并且仅仅提供了"多元化安全" 的**一个**方面。
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
虽然 LKRG 可以防御许多对 Linux 内核的已存在的漏洞利用，而且也有可能会防御将来许多的（包括未知的）未特意设计去绕过 LKRG 的安全漏洞利用。它是设计为可旁通的（尽管有时候是以更复杂和/或低可利用为代价的）。因此，他们说 LKRG 通过多元化提供安全，就像运行一个不常见的操作系统内核一样，也就不会有真实运行一个不常见的操作系统的可用性弊端。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
LKRG 有点像基于 Windows 的防病毒软件，它也是工作于内核级别去检测漏洞利用和恶意软件。但是，LKRG 团队说，他们的产品比防病毒软件以及其它终端安全软件更加安全，因为它的基础代码量比较小，所以在内核级别引入新 bug 和漏洞的可能性就更小。
|
||||
|
||||
### 运行当前版本的 LKRG 大约会带来 6.5% 的性能损失
|
||||
|
||||
Peslyak 说 LKRG 是非常适用于 Linux 机器的，它在修补内核的安全漏洞后不需要重启动机器。LKRG 允许用户去持续运行带有安全措施的机器，直到在一个计划的维护窗口中测试和部署关键的安全补丁为止。
|
||||
|
||||
经测试显示，安装 LKRG v0.0 后大约会产生 6.5% 性能影响，但是，Peslyak 说将在后续的开发中持续降低这种影响。
|
||||
|
||||
测试也显示，LKRG 检测到了 CVE-2014-9322 (BadIRET)、CVE-2017-5123 (waitid(2) missing access_ok)、以及 CVE-2017-6074 (use-after-free in DCCP protocol) 的漏洞利用企图，但是没有检测到 CVE-2016-5195 (Dirty COW) 的漏洞利用企图。开发团队说，由于前面提到的”可旁通“的设计策略，LKRG 没有检测到 Dirty COW 提权攻击。
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
在 Dirty COW 的测试案例中，由于 bug 机制的原因，使得 LKRG 发生了 "旁通"，并且这也是一种利用方法，它也是将来类似的以用户空间为目标的绕过 LKRG 的一种方法。这样的漏洞利用是否会是普通情况（不太可能！除非 LKRG 或者类似机制的软件流行起来），以及对它的可用性的（负面的）影响是什么？（对于那些直接目标是用户空间的内核漏洞来说，这不太重要，也并不简单）。
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
via: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/linux/lkrg-linux-to-get-a-loadable-kernel-module-for-runtime-integrity-checking/
|
||||
|
||||
作者：[Catalin Cimpanu][a]
|
||||
译者：[qhwdw](https://github.com/qhwdw)
|
||||
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||
|
||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||
|
||||
[a]:https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/author/catalin-cimpanu/
|
||||
[1]:https://www.bleepstatic.com/content/posts/2018/02/04/LKRG-logo.png
|
||||
[2]:http://www.openwall.com/lkrg/
|
||||
[3]:http://openwall.info/wiki/p_lkrg/Main
|
||||
[4]:https://www.patreon.com/p_lkrg
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user