mirror of
https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git
synced 2024-12-26 21:30:55 +08:00
translated
This commit is contained in:
geekpi
parent
21c9082923
commit
e87c9eaf51
@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
|
|||||||
translating---geekpi
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Revisiting wallabag, an open source alternative to Instapaper
|
|
||||||
======
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Back in 2014, I [wrote about wallabag][1], an open source alternative to read-it-later applications like Instapaper and Pocket. Go take a look at that article if you want to. Don't worry, I'll wait for you.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Done? Great!
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In the four years since I wrote that article, a lot about [wallabag][2] has changed. It's time to take a peek to see how wallabag has matured.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### What's new
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The biggest change took place behind the scenes. Wallabag's developer Nicolas Lœuillet and the project's contributors did a lot of tinkering with the code, which improved the application. You see and feel the changes wrought by wallabag's newer codebase every time you use it.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
So what are some of those changes? There are [quite a few][3]. Here are the ones I found most interesting and useful.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Besides making wallabag a bit snappier and more stable, the application's ability to import and export content has improved. You can import articles from Pocket and Instapaper, as well as articles marked as "To read" in bookmarking service [Pinboard][4]. You can also import Firefox and Chrome bookmarks.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
You can also export your articles in several formats including EPUB, MOBI, PDF, and plaintext. You can do that for individual articles, all your unread articles, or every article—read and unread. The version of wallabag that I used four years ago could export to EPUB and PDF, but that export was balky at times. Now, those exports are quick and smooth.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Annotations and highlighting in the web interface now work much better and more consistently. Admittedly, I don't use them often—but they don't randomly disappear like they sometimes did with version 1 of wallabag.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The look and feel of wallabag have improved, too. That's thanks to a new theme inspired by [Material Design][5]. That might not seem like a big deal, but that theme makes wallabag a bit more visually attractive and makes articles easier to scan and read. Yes, kids, good UX can make a difference.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
One of the biggest changes was the introduction of [a hosted version][6] of wallabag. More than a few people (yours truly included) don't have a server to run web apps and aren't entirely comfortable doing that. When it comes to anything technical, I have 10 thumbs. I don't mind paying € 9 (just over US$ 10 at the time I wrote this) a year to get a fully working version of the application that I don't need to watch over.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### What hasn't changed
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Overall, wallabag's core functions are the same. The updated codebase, as I mentioned above, makes those functions run quite a bit smoother and quicker.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Wallabag's [browser extensions][7] do the same job in the same way. I've found that the extensions work a bit better than they did when I first tried them and when the application was at version 1.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### What's disappointing
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The mobile app is good, but it's not great. It does a good job of rendering articles and has a few configuration options. But you can't highlight or annotate articles. That said, you can use the app to dip into your stock of archived articles.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
While wallabag does a great job collecting articles, there are sites whose content you can't save to it. I haven't run into many such sites, but there have been enough for the situation to be annoying. I'm not sure how much that has to do with wallabag. Rather, I suspect it has something to do with the way the sites are coded—I ran into the same problem while looking at a couple of proprietary read-it-later tools.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Wallabag might not be a feature-for-feature replacement for Pocket or Instapaper, but it does a great job. It has improved noticeably in the four years since I first wrote about it. There's still room for improvement, but does what it says on the tin.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Final thoughts
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Since 2014, wallabag has evolved. It's gotten better, bit by bit and step by step. While it might not be a feature-for-feature replacement for the likes of Instapaper and Pocket, wallabag is a worthy open source alternative to proprietary read-it-later tools.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
via: https://opensource.com/article/18/7/wallabag
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
作者：[Scott Nesbitt][a]
|
|
||||||
选题：[lujun9972](https://github.com/lujun9972)
|
|
||||||
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
|
|
||||||
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[a]:https://opensource.com/users/scottnesbitt
|
|
||||||
[1]:https://opensource.com/life/14/4/open-source-read-it-later-app-wallabag
|
|
||||||
[2]:https://wallabag.org/en
|
|
||||||
[3]:https://www.wallabag.org/en/news/wallabag-v2
|
|
||||||
[4]:https://pinboard.in
|
|
||||||
[5]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_Design
|
|
||||||
[6]:https://www.wallabag.it
|
|
||||||
[7]:https://github.com/wallabag/wallabagger
|
|
||||||
@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
|||||||
|
重温 wallabag，Instapaper 的开源替代品
|
||||||
|
======
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
早在 2014 年，我[写了篇关于 wallabag 的文章][1]，它是稍后阅读应用如 Instapaper 和 Pocket 的开源替代品。如果你愿意，去看看那篇文章吧。别担心，我会等你的。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
好了么？很好
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
自从我写这篇文章的四年来，[wallabag][2]的很多东西都发生了变化。现在是时候看看 wallabag 是如何成熟的。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 有什么新的
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
最大的变化发生在幕后。Wallabag 的开发人员 Nicolas Lœuillet 和该项目的贡献者对代码进行了大量修改，从而改进了程序。每次使用时，你都会看到并感受到 wallabag 新代码库所带来的变化。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
那么这些变化有哪些呢？有[很多][3]。以下是我发现最有趣和最有用的内容。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
除了使 wallabag 更加快速和稳定之外，程序的导入和导出内容的能力也得到了提高。你可以从 Pocket 和 Instapaper 导入文章，也可导入书签服务 [Pinboard][4] 中标记为 “To read” 的文章。你还可以导入 Firefox 和 Chrome 书签。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
你还可以以多种格式导出文章，包括 EPUB、MOBI、PDF 和纯文本。你可以为单篇文章、所有未读文章或所有已读和未读执行此操作。我四年前使用的 wallabag 版本可以导出到 EPUB 和 PDF，但有时导出很糟糕。现在，这些导出快速而顺利。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Web 界面中的注释和高亮显示现在可以更好，更一致地工作。不可否认，我并不经常使用它们 - 但它们不会像 wallabag v1 那样随机消失。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
wallabag 的外观和感觉也有所改善。这要归功于受 [Material Design][5] 启发的新主题。这似乎不是什么大不了的事，但这个主题使得 wallabag 在视觉上更具吸引力，使文章更容易扫描和阅读。是的，孩子们，良好的用户体验可以有所不同。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
其中一个最大的变化是引入了 wallabag 的[托管版本][6]。不止一些人（包括你在内）没有服务器来运行网络程序，并且不太愿意这样做。当遇到任何技术问题时，我很窘迫。我不介意每年花 9 欧元（我写这篇文章的时候只要 10 美元），以获得一个我不需要关注的程序的完整工作版本。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 没有改变什么
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
总的来说，wallabag 的核心功能是相同的。如上所述，更新的代码库使这些函数运行得更顺畅，更快速。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Wallabag 的[浏览器扩展][7]以同样的方式完成同样的工作。我发现这些扩展比我第一次尝试时和程序的 v1 版本时要好一些。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 有什么令人失望的
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
移动应用良好，但没有很棒。它在渲染文章方面做得很好，并且有一些配置选项。但是你不能高亮或注释文章。也就是说，你可以使用该程序浏览你的存档文章。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
虽然 wallabag 在收藏文章方面做得很好，但有些网站的内容却无法保存。我没有碰到很多这样的网站，但已经遇到让人烦恼的情况。我不确定与 wallabag 有多大关系。相反，我怀疑它与网站的编码方式有关 - 我在使用几个专有的稍后阅读工具时遇到了同样的问题。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Wallabag 可能不是 Pocket 或 Instapaper 的等功能的替代品，但它做得很好。自从我第一次写这篇文章以来的四年里，它已经有了明显的改善。它仍然有改进的余地，但要做好它宣传的。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 最后的想法
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
自 2014 年以来，wallabag 在一直在演化。它一点一滴，一步一步地变得更好。虽然它可能不是 Instapaper 和 Pocket 等功能的替代品，但 wallabag 有价值的专有稍后阅读工具的开源替代品。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
via: https://opensource.com/article/18/7/wallabag
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
作者：[Scott Nesbitt][a]
|
||||||
|
选题：[lujun9972](https://github.com/lujun9972)
|
||||||
|
译者：[geekpi](https://github.com/geekpi)
|
||||||
|
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[a]:https://opensource.com/users/scottnesbitt
|
||||||
|
[1]:https://opensource.com/life/14/4/open-source-read-it-later-app-wallabag
|
||||||
|
[2]:https://wallabag.org/en
|
||||||
|
[3]:https://www.wallabag.org/en/news/wallabag-v2
|
||||||
|
[4]:https://pinboard.in
|
||||||
|
[5]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_Design
|
||||||
|
[6]:https://www.wallabag.it
|
||||||
|
[7]:https://github.com/wallabag/wallabagger
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user