From ef7b84fa058908f0d5bc499ea4eb6b716df7f253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: MjSeven <33125422+MjSeven@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 00:19:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Delete 20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md --- ...7 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md | 84 ------------------- 1 file changed, 84 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md diff --git a/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md b/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md deleted file mode 100644 index 36411a9bfe..0000000000 --- a/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,84 +0,0 @@ -Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise -====== -In this article, I'll share the top Linux distros for enterprise environments. Some of these distros are used in server and cloud environments along with desktop duties. The one constant that all of these Linux options have is that they are enterprise grade Linux distributions -- so you can expect a high greater degree of functionality and, of course, support. - -### What is an enterprise grade Linux distribution? - -An enterprise grade Linux distribution comes down to the following - stability and support. Both of these components must be met to take any Linux distribution seriously in an enterprise environment. Stability means that the packages provided are both stable to use, while still maintaining an expected level of security. - -The support element of an enterprise grade distribution means that there is a reliable support mechanism in place. Sometimes this is a single (official) source such as a company. In other instances, it might be a governing not-for-profit that provides reliable recommendations to good third party support vendors. Obviously the former option is the best one, however both are acceptable. - -### Red Hat Enterprise Linux - -[Red Hat][1] has a number of great offerings, all with enterprise grade support made available. Their core focuses are as follows: - -\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server: This is a group of server offerings that includes everything from container hosting down to SAP server, among other server variants. - -\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop: These are tightly controlled user environments running Red Hat Linux that provide basic desktop functionality. This functionality includes access to the latest applications such as a web browser, email, LibreOffice and more. - -\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation: This is basically Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop, but optimized for high-performance tasks. It's also best suited for larger deployments and ongoing administration. - -### Why Red Hat Enterprise Linux? - -Red Hat is a large, highly successful company that sells services around Linux. Basically Red Hat makes their money from companies that want to avoid vendor lock-in and other related headaches. These companies see the value in hiring open source software experts to manage their servers and other computing needs. A company need only buy a subscription and let Red Hat do the rest in terms of support. - -Red Hat is also a solid social citizen. They sponsor open source projects, FoSS advocate websites like OpenSource.com and also provide support to the Fedora project. Fedora is not owned by Red Hat, rather its development is sponsored instead. This allows Fedora to grow while also benefiting Red Hat who then can take what they like from the Fedora project and use it in their enterprise Linux offerings. As things stand now, Fedora acts as an upstream channel of sorts for Red Hat's Enterprise Linux. - -### SUSE Linux Enterprise - -[SUSE][2] is a fantastic company that provides enterprise users with solid Linux options. SUSE offerings are similar to Red Hat in that both the desktop and server are both focused on by the company. Speaking from my own experiences with SUSE, I believe that YaST has proven to be a huge asset for non-Linux administrators looking to implement Linux boxes into their workplace. YaST provides a friendly GUI for tasks that would otherwise require some basic Linux command line knowledge. - -SUSE's core focuses are as follows: - -\- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server: This includes task specific solutions ranging from cloud to SAP options, as well as, mission critical computing and software-based data storage. - -\- SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop: For those companies looking to have a solid Linux workstation for their employees, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop is a great option. And like Red Hat, SUSE provides access to their support offerings via a subscription model. You can choose three different levels of support. - -Why SUSE Linux Enterprise? - -SUSE is a company that sells services around Linux, but they do so by focusing on keeping it simple. From their website down to the distribution of Linux offered by SUSE, the focus is ease of use without sacrificing security or reliability. While there is no question at least here in the States that Red Hat is the standard for servers, SUSE has done quite well for themselves both as a company and as contributing members of the open source community. - -I'll also go on record in suggesting that SUSE doesn't take themselves too seriously, which is a great thing when you're making connections in the world of IT. From their fun music videos about Linux down to the Gecko used in SUSE trade booths for fun photo opportunities, SUSE presents themselves as simple to understand and approachable. - -### Ubuntu LTS Linux - -[Ubuntu Long Term Release][3] (LTS) Linux is a simple to use enterprise grade Linux distribution. Ubuntu sees more frequent (and sometimes less stable) updates than the other distros mentioned above. Don't misunderstand, Ubuntu LTS editions are considered to be quite stable. However I think some experts may disagree if you were to suggest that they're bullet proof. - -Ubuntu's core focuses are as follows: - -\- Ubuntu Desktop: Without question, the Ubuntu desktop is dead simple to learn and get running quickly. What it may lack in advanced installation features, it makes up for with straight forward simplicity. As an added bonus, Ubuntu has more packages available than anyone (except for its father distribution, Debian). I think where Ubuntu really shines is that you can find a number of vendors online that sell Ubuntu pre-installed. This includes servers, desktops and notebooks. - -\- Ubuntu Server: This includes server, cloud and container offerings. Ubuntu also provides an interesting concept with their Juju cloud "app store" offering. Ubuntu Server makes a lot of sense for anyone who is familiar with Ubuntu or Debian. For these individuals, it fits like a glove and provides you with the command line tools you already know and love. - -Ubuntu IoT: Most recently, Ubuntu's development team has taken aim at creation solutions for the "Internet of Things" (IoT). This includes digital signage, robotics and the IoT gateways themselves. My guess is that the bulk of the IoT growth we'll see with Ubuntu will come from enterprise users and not so much from casual home users. - -Why Ubuntu LTS? - -Community is Ubuntu's greatest strength. Both with casual users, in addition to their tremendous growth in the already crowded server market. The development and user communities using Ubuntu are rock solid. So while it may be considered more unstable than other enterprise distros, I've found that locking an Ubuntu LTS installation into a 'security updates only' mode provides a very stable experience. - -### What about CentOS or Scientific Linux? - -First off let's address [CentOS][4] as an enterprise distribution. If you have your own in-house support team to maintain it, then a CentOS installation is a fantastic option. After all, it's compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and offers the same level of stability as Red Hat's offering. Unfortunately it's not going to completely replace a Red Hat support subscription. - -And [Scientific Linux][5]? What about that distribution? Well it's like CentOS, it's based on Red Hat Linux. But unlike CentOS, there is no affiliation with Red Hat. Scientific Linux has one mission from its inception - to provide a common Linux distribution for labs across the world. Today, Scientific Linux is basically Red Hat minus the trademark material included. - -Neither of these distros are truly interchangeable with Red Hat as they lack the Red Hat support component. - -Which of these is the top distro for enterprise? I think that depends on a number of factors that you'd need to figure out for yourself: subscription coverage, availability, cost, services and features offered. These are all considerations each company must determine for themselves. Speaking for myself personally, I think Red Hat wins on the server while SUSE easily wins on the desktop environment. But that's just my opinion - do you disagree? Hit the Comments section below and let's talk about it. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -via: https://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-linux-distros-for-the-enterprise.html - -作者：[Matt Hartley][a] -译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) -校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) - -本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 - -[a]:https://www.datamation.com/author/Matt-Hartley-3080.html -[1]:https://www.redhat.com/en -[2]:https://www.suse.com/ -[3]:http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ -[4]:https://www.centos.org/ -[5]:https://www.scientificlinux.org/ From f30e5e82675fc03b309f86d54a56018fa9906736 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: MjSeven <33125422+MjSeven@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 00:20:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] Create 20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md --- ...7 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md | 82 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md diff --git a/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md b/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..204aa2137c --- /dev/null +++ b/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +面向企业的最佳 Linux 发行版 +==== + +在这篇文章中，我将分享企业环境下顶级的 Linux 发行版。其中一些发行版与桌面任务一起用于服务器和云环境。所有这些 Linux 选项具有的一个共同点是它们都是企业级 Linux 发行版 -- 所以你可以期待更高程度的功能，当然还有支持。 + +### 什么是企业级的 Linux 发行版？ + +一个企业级的 Linux 发行版可以归结为以下内容 - 稳定性和支持。在企业环境中，使用的 Linux 版本必须满足这两点。稳定性意味着所提供的软件包既稳定又可用，同时仍然保持预期的安全性。 + +企业级的支持因素意味着有一个可靠的支持机制。有时这是单一的（官方）来源，如公司。在其他情况下，它可能是一个非营利性的执政机构，向优秀的第三方支持供应商提供可靠的建议。很明显，前者是最好的选择，但两者都可以接受。 + +### Red Hat 企业级 Linux + +[Red Hat][1] 有很多很棒的产品，都有企业级的支持来保证可用。其核心重点如下： + +- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 服务器：这是一组服务器产品，包括从容器托管到 SAP 服务的所有内容，还有其他衍生的服务器。 +- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 桌面：这些是严格控制的用户环境，运行 Red Hat Linux，提供基本的桌面功能。这些功能包括访问最新的应用程序，如 web 浏览器、电子邮件、LibreOffice 等。 +- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 工作站：这基本上是 Red Hat 企业级 Linux 桌面，但针对高性能任务进行了优化。它也非常适合于大型部署和持续管理。 + +### 为什么选择 Red Hat 企业级 Linux？ + +Red Hat 是一家大型的、非常成功的公司，销售围绕 Linux 的服务。基本上，Red Hat 从那些想要避免供应商锁定和其他相关问题的公司赚钱。这些公司认识到聘用开源软件专家和管理他们的服务器和其他计算需求的价值。一家公司只需要购买订阅，Red Hat 会在支持方面做其余的工作。 + +Red Hat 也是一个可靠的社会公民。他们赞助开源项目，FoSS 支持网站（译注：FoSS 是 Free and Open Source Software 的缩写，意为自由及开源软件），像OpenSource.com 这样的网站，并为 Fedora 项目提供支持。Fedora 不是由 Red Hat 所有，而是它赞助开发的。这使 Fedora 得以发展，同时也使 Red Hat 受益匪浅。Red Hat 可以从 Fedora 项目中获得他们想要的，并将其用于他们的企业级 Linux 产品中。 就目前来看，Fedora 充当了红帽企业 Linux 的上游渠道。 + +### SUSE Linux 企业版本 + +[SUSE][2] 是一家非常棒的公司，为企业用户提供了可靠的 Linux 选项。SUSE 的产品类似于 Red Hat，因为桌面和服务器都是公司关注的。从我自己使用 SUSE 的经验来看，我相信 YaST 已经证明对于希望在工作场所使用 Linux 操作系统的非 Linux 管理员而言，它是一笔巨大的资产。YaST 为那些需要一些基本的 Linux 命令行知识的任务提供了一个友好的 GUI。 + +SUSE 的核心重点如下： + +- SUSE Linux 企业级服务器：包括任务特定的解决方案，从云到 SAP 选项，以及任务关键计算和基于软件的数据存储。 +- SUSE Linux 企业级桌面：对于那些希望为员工提供可靠的 Linux 工作站的公司来说，SUSE Linux 企业级桌面是一个不错的选择。和 Red Hat 一样，SUSE 通过订阅模式来提供对其支持产品的访问。你可以选择三个不同级别的支持。 + +为什么选择 SUSE Linux 企业版？ + +SUSE 是一家围绕 Linux 销售服务的公司，但他们仍然通过专注于简化操作来实现这一目标。从他们的网站到 SUSE 提供的 Linux 发行版，重点是易用性，而不会牺牲安全性或可靠性。尽管在美国毫无疑问 Red Hat 是服务器的标准，但 SUSE 作为公司和开源社区贡献成员都做得很好。 + +我还会继续说，SUSE 不会把自己太当回事。当你在 IT 领域建立联系的时候，这是一件很棒的事情。从他们关于 Linux 的有趣音乐视频到 SUSE 贸易展位中使用的 Gecko 以获得有趣的照片机会，SUSE 将自己描述成简单易懂和平易近人的形象。 + +### Ubuntu LTS Linux + +[Ubuntu Long Term Release][3] (LTS) Linux 是一个简单易用的企业级 Linux 发行版。Ubuntu 看起来比上面提到的其他发行版更新更频繁（有时候也更不稳定）。不要误解，Ubuntu LTS 版本被认为是相当稳定的，不过，我认为一些专家可能不同意你的观点，如果你认为他们是防弹的。（这句不太理解） + +Ubuntu 的核心重点如下： + +- Ubuntu 桌面版：毫无疑问，Ubuntu 桌面非常简单，可以快速学习和快速运行。它在高级安装选项中可能缺少一些东西，但它有一种直截了当的弥补。作为额外的奖励，Ubuntu 相比比其他版本有更多的软件包（除了它的父亲，Debian 发行版）。我认为 Ubuntu 真正的亮点在于，你可以在网上找到许多销售 Ubuntu 的厂商，包括服务器，台式机和笔记本电脑。 +- Ubuntu 服务器版：这包括服务器，云和容器产品。Ubuntu 还提供了 Juju 云“应用商店”这样一个有趣的概念。对于任何熟悉 Ubuntu 或 Debian 的人来说，Ubuntu 服务器都很有意义。对于这些人来说，它就像手套一样，为你提供你已经知道并喜爱的命令行工具。 + +Ubuntu IoT：最近，Ubuntu 的开发团队已经把目标瞄准了“物联网”（IoT）的创建解决方案。包括数字标识、机器人技术和物联网网关。我的猜测是，我们将在 Ubuntu 中看到物联网增长的大部分来自企业用户，而不是普通家庭用户。 + +为什么选择 Ubuntu LTS？ + +社区是 Ubuntu 最大的优点。除了在已经拥挤的服务器市场上的巨大增长之外，它还与普通用户在一起。使用 Ubuntu 开发者和社区用户是坚如磐石的。因此，虽然它可能被认为比其他企业版更不稳定，但是我发现将 Ubuntu LTS 安装锁定到到 “security updates only” 模式下提供了非常稳定的体验。 + +### CentOS 或者 Scientific Linux 怎么样呢？ + +首先，让我们把 [CentOS][4] 作为一个企业发行版，如果你有自己的内部支持团队来维护它，那么安装 CentOS 是一个很好的选择。毕竟，它与 Red Hat 企业级 Linux 兼容，并提供了与 Red Hat 产品相同级别的稳定性。不幸的是，它不会完全取代 Red Hat 支持订阅。 + +那么 [Scientific Linux][5] 呢？它的发行版怎么样？好吧，它就像 CentOS，它是基于 Red Hat Linux 的。但与 CentOS 不同的是，它与 Red Hat 没有任何关系。 Scientific Linux 从一开始就有一个目标 - 为世界各地的实验室提供一个通用的 Linux 发行版。今天，Scientific Linux 基本上是 Red Hat 减去包含的商标资料。 + +这两种发行版都不能真正地与 Red Hat 互换，因为他们缺少 Red Hat 支持组件。 + +哪一个是顶级企业发行版？我认为这取决于你需要为自己确定的许多因素：订阅范围，可用性，成本，服务和提供的功能。这些是每个公司必须自己决定的因素。就我个人而言，我认为 Red Hat 在服务器上获胜，而 SUSE 在桌面环境中轻松获胜，但这只是我的意见 - 你不同意？点击下面的评论部分，让我们来谈谈它。 + + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +via: https://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-linux-distros-for-the-enterprise.html + +作者：[Matt Hartley][a] +译者：[MjSeven](https://github.com/MjSeven) +校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) + +本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 + +[a]:https://www.datamation.com/author/Matt-Hartley-3080.html +[1]:https://www.redhat.com/en +[2]:https://www.suse.com/ +[3]:http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ +[4]:https://www.centos.org/ +[5]:https://www.scientificlinux.org/ From 1c9f83879479c1ff166667465afc41790f32d0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: MjSeven <33125422+MjSeven@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 00:23:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] Delete 20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md --- ...7 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md | 82 ------------------- 1 file changed, 82 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md diff --git a/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md b/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md deleted file mode 100644 index 204aa2137c..0000000000 --- a/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,82 +0,0 @@ -面向企业的最佳 Linux 发行版 -==== - -在这篇文章中，我将分享企业环境下顶级的 Linux 发行版。其中一些发行版与桌面任务一起用于服务器和云环境。所有这些 Linux 选项具有的一个共同点是它们都是企业级 Linux 发行版 -- 所以你可以期待更高程度的功能，当然还有支持。 - -### 什么是企业级的 Linux 发行版？ - -一个企业级的 Linux 发行版可以归结为以下内容 - 稳定性和支持。在企业环境中，使用的 Linux 版本必须满足这两点。稳定性意味着所提供的软件包既稳定又可用，同时仍然保持预期的安全性。 - -企业级的支持因素意味着有一个可靠的支持机制。有时这是单一的（官方）来源，如公司。在其他情况下，它可能是一个非营利性的执政机构，向优秀的第三方支持供应商提供可靠的建议。很明显，前者是最好的选择，但两者都可以接受。 - -### Red Hat 企业级 Linux - -[Red Hat][1] 有很多很棒的产品，都有企业级的支持来保证可用。其核心重点如下： - -- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 服务器：这是一组服务器产品，包括从容器托管到 SAP 服务的所有内容，还有其他衍生的服务器。 -- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 桌面：这些是严格控制的用户环境，运行 Red Hat Linux，提供基本的桌面功能。这些功能包括访问最新的应用程序，如 web 浏览器、电子邮件、LibreOffice 等。 -- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 工作站：这基本上是 Red Hat 企业级 Linux 桌面，但针对高性能任务进行了优化。它也非常适合于大型部署和持续管理。 - -### 为什么选择 Red Hat 企业级 Linux？ - -Red Hat 是一家大型的、非常成功的公司，销售围绕 Linux 的服务。基本上，Red Hat 从那些想要避免供应商锁定和其他相关问题的公司赚钱。这些公司认识到聘用开源软件专家和管理他们的服务器和其他计算需求的价值。一家公司只需要购买订阅，Red Hat 会在支持方面做其余的工作。 - -Red Hat 也是一个可靠的社会公民。他们赞助开源项目，FoSS 支持网站（译注：FoSS 是 Free and Open Source Software 的缩写，意为自由及开源软件），像OpenSource.com 这样的网站，并为 Fedora 项目提供支持。Fedora 不是由 Red Hat 所有，而是它赞助开发的。这使 Fedora 得以发展，同时也使 Red Hat 受益匪浅。Red Hat 可以从 Fedora 项目中获得他们想要的，并将其用于他们的企业级 Linux 产品中。 就目前来看，Fedora 充当了红帽企业 Linux 的上游渠道。 - -### SUSE Linux 企业版本 - -[SUSE][2] 是一家非常棒的公司，为企业用户提供了可靠的 Linux 选项。SUSE 的产品类似于 Red Hat，因为桌面和服务器都是公司关注的。从我自己使用 SUSE 的经验来看，我相信 YaST 已经证明对于希望在工作场所使用 Linux 操作系统的非 Linux 管理员而言，它是一笔巨大的资产。YaST 为那些需要一些基本的 Linux 命令行知识的任务提供了一个友好的 GUI。 - -SUSE 的核心重点如下： - -- SUSE Linux 企业级服务器：包括任务特定的解决方案，从云到 SAP 选项，以及任务关键计算和基于软件的数据存储。 -- SUSE Linux 企业级桌面：对于那些希望为员工提供可靠的 Linux 工作站的公司来说，SUSE Linux 企业级桌面是一个不错的选择。和 Red Hat 一样，SUSE 通过订阅模式来提供对其支持产品的访问。你可以选择三个不同级别的支持。 - -为什么选择 SUSE Linux 企业版？ - -SUSE 是一家围绕 Linux 销售服务的公司，但他们仍然通过专注于简化操作来实现这一目标。从他们的网站到 SUSE 提供的 Linux 发行版，重点是易用性，而不会牺牲安全性或可靠性。尽管在美国毫无疑问 Red Hat 是服务器的标准，但 SUSE 作为公司和开源社区贡献成员都做得很好。 - -我还会继续说，SUSE 不会把自己太当回事。当你在 IT 领域建立联系的时候，这是一件很棒的事情。从他们关于 Linux 的有趣音乐视频到 SUSE 贸易展位中使用的 Gecko 以获得有趣的照片机会，SUSE 将自己描述成简单易懂和平易近人的形象。 - -### Ubuntu LTS Linux - -[Ubuntu Long Term Release][3] (LTS) Linux 是一个简单易用的企业级 Linux 发行版。Ubuntu 看起来比上面提到的其他发行版更新更频繁（有时候也更不稳定）。不要误解，Ubuntu LTS 版本被认为是相当稳定的，不过，我认为一些专家可能不同意你的观点，如果你认为他们是防弹的。（这句不太理解） - -Ubuntu 的核心重点如下： - -- Ubuntu 桌面版：毫无疑问，Ubuntu 桌面非常简单，可以快速学习和快速运行。它在高级安装选项中可能缺少一些东西，但它有一种直截了当的弥补。作为额外的奖励，Ubuntu 相比比其他版本有更多的软件包（除了它的父亲，Debian 发行版）。我认为 Ubuntu 真正的亮点在于，你可以在网上找到许多销售 Ubuntu 的厂商，包括服务器，台式机和笔记本电脑。 -- Ubuntu 服务器版：这包括服务器，云和容器产品。Ubuntu 还提供了 Juju 云“应用商店”这样一个有趣的概念。对于任何熟悉 Ubuntu 或 Debian 的人来说，Ubuntu 服务器都很有意义。对于这些人来说，它就像手套一样，为你提供你已经知道并喜爱的命令行工具。 - -Ubuntu IoT：最近，Ubuntu 的开发团队已经把目标瞄准了“物联网”（IoT）的创建解决方案。包括数字标识、机器人技术和物联网网关。我的猜测是，我们将在 Ubuntu 中看到物联网增长的大部分来自企业用户，而不是普通家庭用户。 - -为什么选择 Ubuntu LTS？ - -社区是 Ubuntu 最大的优点。除了在已经拥挤的服务器市场上的巨大增长之外，它还与普通用户在一起。使用 Ubuntu 开发者和社区用户是坚如磐石的。因此，虽然它可能被认为比其他企业版更不稳定，但是我发现将 Ubuntu LTS 安装锁定到到 “security updates only” 模式下提供了非常稳定的体验。 - -### CentOS 或者 Scientific Linux 怎么样呢？ - -首先，让我们把 [CentOS][4] 作为一个企业发行版，如果你有自己的内部支持团队来维护它，那么安装 CentOS 是一个很好的选择。毕竟，它与 Red Hat 企业级 Linux 兼容，并提供了与 Red Hat 产品相同级别的稳定性。不幸的是，它不会完全取代 Red Hat 支持订阅。 - -那么 [Scientific Linux][5] 呢？它的发行版怎么样？好吧，它就像 CentOS，它是基于 Red Hat Linux 的。但与 CentOS 不同的是，它与 Red Hat 没有任何关系。 Scientific Linux 从一开始就有一个目标 - 为世界各地的实验室提供一个通用的 Linux 发行版。今天，Scientific Linux 基本上是 Red Hat 减去包含的商标资料。 - -这两种发行版都不能真正地与 Red Hat 互换，因为他们缺少 Red Hat 支持组件。 - -哪一个是顶级企业发行版？我认为这取决于你需要为自己确定的许多因素：订阅范围，可用性，成本，服务和提供的功能。这些是每个公司必须自己决定的因素。就我个人而言，我认为 Red Hat 在服务器上获胜，而 SUSE 在桌面环境中轻松获胜，但这只是我的意见 - 你不同意？点击下面的评论部分，让我们来谈谈它。 - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -via: https://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-linux-distros-for-the-enterprise.html - -作者：[Matt Hartley][a] -译者：[MjSeven](https://github.com/MjSeven) -校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) - -本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 - -[a]:https://www.datamation.com/author/Matt-Hartley-3080.html -[1]:https://www.redhat.com/en -[2]:https://www.suse.com/ -[3]:http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ -[4]:https://www.centos.org/ -[5]:https://www.scientificlinux.org/ From 7b171d13f463a46da02b3a38e62d1651f7e2b6fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: MjSeven <33125422+MjSeven@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 00:24:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] Create 20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md --- ...7 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md | 86 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md diff --git a/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md b/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..797ed71ff2 --- /dev/null +++ b/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +Translating by MjSeven + +Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise +====== +In this article, I'll share the top Linux distros for enterprise environments. Some of these distros are used in server and cloud environments along with desktop duties. The one constant that all of these Linux options have is that they are enterprise grade Linux distributions -- so you can expect a high greater degree of functionality and, of course, support. + +### What is an enterprise grade Linux distribution? + +An enterprise grade Linux distribution comes down to the following - stability and support. Both of these components must be met to take any Linux distribution seriously in an enterprise environment. Stability means that the packages provided are both stable to use, while still maintaining an expected level of security. + +The support element of an enterprise grade distribution means that there is a reliable support mechanism in place. Sometimes this is a single (official) source such as a company. In other instances, it might be a governing not-for-profit that provides reliable recommendations to good third party support vendors. Obviously the former option is the best one, however both are acceptable. + +### Red Hat Enterprise Linux + +[Red Hat][1] has a number of great offerings, all with enterprise grade support made available. Their core focuses are as follows: + +\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server: This is a group of server offerings that includes everything from container hosting down to SAP server, among other server variants. + +\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop: These are tightly controlled user environments running Red Hat Linux that provide basic desktop functionality. This functionality includes access to the latest applications such as a web browser, email, LibreOffice and more. + +\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation: This is basically Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop, but optimized for high-performance tasks. It's also best suited for larger deployments and ongoing administration. + +### Why Red Hat Enterprise Linux? + +Red Hat is a large, highly successful company that sells services around Linux. Basically Red Hat makes their money from companies that want to avoid vendor lock-in and other related headaches. These companies see the value in hiring open source software experts to manage their servers and other computing needs. A company need only buy a subscription and let Red Hat do the rest in terms of support. + +Red Hat is also a solid social citizen. They sponsor open source projects, FoSS advocate websites like OpenSource.com and also provide support to the Fedora project. Fedora is not owned by Red Hat, rather its development is sponsored instead. This allows Fedora to grow while also benefiting Red Hat who then can take what they like from the Fedora project and use it in their enterprise Linux offerings. As things stand now, Fedora acts as an upstream channel of sorts for Red Hat's Enterprise Linux. + +### SUSE Linux Enterprise + +[SUSE][2] is a fantastic company that provides enterprise users with solid Linux options. SUSE offerings are similar to Red Hat in that both the desktop and server are both focused on by the company. Speaking from my own experiences with SUSE, I believe that YaST has proven to be a huge asset for non-Linux administrators looking to implement Linux boxes into their workplace. YaST provides a friendly GUI for tasks that would otherwise require some basic Linux command line knowledge. + +SUSE's core focuses are as follows: + +\- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server: This includes task specific solutions ranging from cloud to SAP options, as well as, mission critical computing and software-based data storage. + +\- SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop: For those companies looking to have a solid Linux workstation for their employees, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop is a great option. And like Red Hat, SUSE provides access to their support offerings via a subscription model. You can choose three different levels of support. + +Why SUSE Linux Enterprise? + +SUSE is a company that sells services around Linux, but they do so by focusing on keeping it simple. From their website down to the distribution of Linux offered by SUSE, the focus is ease of use without sacrificing security or reliability. While there is no question at least here in the States that Red Hat is the standard for servers, SUSE has done quite well for themselves both as a company and as contributing members of the open source community. + +I'll also go on record in suggesting that SUSE doesn't take themselves too seriously, which is a great thing when you're making connections in the world of IT. From their fun music videos about Linux down to the Gecko used in SUSE trade booths for fun photo opportunities, SUSE presents themselves as simple to understand and approachable. + +### Ubuntu LTS Linux + +[Ubuntu Long Term Release][3] (LTS) Linux is a simple to use enterprise grade Linux distribution. Ubuntu sees more frequent (and sometimes less stable) updates than the other distros mentioned above. Don't misunderstand, Ubuntu LTS editions are considered to be quite stable. However I think some experts may disagree if you were to suggest that they're bullet proof. + +Ubuntu's core focuses are as follows: + +\- Ubuntu Desktop: Without question, the Ubuntu desktop is dead simple to learn and get running quickly. What it may lack in advanced installation features, it makes up for with straight forward simplicity. As an added bonus, Ubuntu has more packages available than anyone (except for its father distribution, Debian). I think where Ubuntu really shines is that you can find a number of vendors online that sell Ubuntu pre-installed. This includes servers, desktops and notebooks. + +\- Ubuntu Server: This includes server, cloud and container offerings. Ubuntu also provides an interesting concept with their Juju cloud "app store" offering. Ubuntu Server makes a lot of sense for anyone who is familiar with Ubuntu or Debian. For these individuals, it fits like a glove and provides you with the command line tools you already know and love. + +Ubuntu IoT: Most recently, Ubuntu's development team has taken aim at creation solutions for the "Internet of Things" (IoT). This includes digital signage, robotics and the IoT gateways themselves. My guess is that the bulk of the IoT growth we'll see with Ubuntu will come from enterprise users and not so much from casual home users. + +Why Ubuntu LTS? + +Community is Ubuntu's greatest strength. Both with casual users, in addition to their tremendous growth in the already crowded server market. The development and user communities using Ubuntu are rock solid. So while it may be considered more unstable than other enterprise distros, I've found that locking an Ubuntu LTS installation into a 'security updates only' mode provides a very stable experience. + +### What about CentOS or Scientific Linux? + +First off let's address [CentOS][4] as an enterprise distribution. If you have your own in-house support team to maintain it, then a CentOS installation is a fantastic option. After all, it's compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and offers the same level of stability as Red Hat's offering. Unfortunately it's not going to completely replace a Red Hat support subscription. + +And [Scientific Linux][5]? What about that distribution? Well it's like CentOS, it's based on Red Hat Linux. But unlike CentOS, there is no affiliation with Red Hat. Scientific Linux has one mission from its inception - to provide a common Linux distribution for labs across the world. Today, Scientific Linux is basically Red Hat minus the trademark material included. + +Neither of these distros are truly interchangeable with Red Hat as they lack the Red Hat support component. + +Which of these is the top distro for enterprise? I think that depends on a number of factors that you'd need to figure out for yourself: subscription coverage, availability, cost, services and features offered. These are all considerations each company must determine for themselves. Speaking for myself personally, I think Red Hat wins on the server while SUSE easily wins on the desktop environment. But that's just my opinion - do you disagree? Hit the Comments section below and let's talk about it. + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +via: https://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-linux-distros-for-the-enterprise.html + +作者：[Matt Hartley][a] +译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) +校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) + +本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 + +[a]:https://www.datamation.com/author/Matt-Hartley-3080.html +[1]:https://www.redhat.com/en +[2]:https://www.suse.com/ +[3]:http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ +[4]:https://www.centos.org/ +[5]:https://www.scientificlinux.org/ From 83ecd09f3246863c28dd1a434321daac2de3fba9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: MjSeven <33125422+MjSeven@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 00:24:59 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] Delete 20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md --- ...7 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md | 86 ------------------- 1 file changed, 86 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md diff --git a/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md b/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md deleted file mode 100644 index 797ed71ff2..0000000000 --- a/sources/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,86 +0,0 @@ -Translating by MjSeven - -Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise -====== -In this article, I'll share the top Linux distros for enterprise environments. Some of these distros are used in server and cloud environments along with desktop duties. The one constant that all of these Linux options have is that they are enterprise grade Linux distributions -- so you can expect a high greater degree of functionality and, of course, support. - -### What is an enterprise grade Linux distribution? - -An enterprise grade Linux distribution comes down to the following - stability and support. Both of these components must be met to take any Linux distribution seriously in an enterprise environment. Stability means that the packages provided are both stable to use, while still maintaining an expected level of security. - -The support element of an enterprise grade distribution means that there is a reliable support mechanism in place. Sometimes this is a single (official) source such as a company. In other instances, it might be a governing not-for-profit that provides reliable recommendations to good third party support vendors. Obviously the former option is the best one, however both are acceptable. - -### Red Hat Enterprise Linux - -[Red Hat][1] has a number of great offerings, all with enterprise grade support made available. Their core focuses are as follows: - -\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server: This is a group of server offerings that includes everything from container hosting down to SAP server, among other server variants. - -\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop: These are tightly controlled user environments running Red Hat Linux that provide basic desktop functionality. This functionality includes access to the latest applications such as a web browser, email, LibreOffice and more. - -\- Red Hat Enterprise Linux Workstation: This is basically Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop, but optimized for high-performance tasks. It's also best suited for larger deployments and ongoing administration. - -### Why Red Hat Enterprise Linux? - -Red Hat is a large, highly successful company that sells services around Linux. Basically Red Hat makes their money from companies that want to avoid vendor lock-in and other related headaches. These companies see the value in hiring open source software experts to manage their servers and other computing needs. A company need only buy a subscription and let Red Hat do the rest in terms of support. - -Red Hat is also a solid social citizen. They sponsor open source projects, FoSS advocate websites like OpenSource.com and also provide support to the Fedora project. Fedora is not owned by Red Hat, rather its development is sponsored instead. This allows Fedora to grow while also benefiting Red Hat who then can take what they like from the Fedora project and use it in their enterprise Linux offerings. As things stand now, Fedora acts as an upstream channel of sorts for Red Hat's Enterprise Linux. - -### SUSE Linux Enterprise - -[SUSE][2] is a fantastic company that provides enterprise users with solid Linux options. SUSE offerings are similar to Red Hat in that both the desktop and server are both focused on by the company. Speaking from my own experiences with SUSE, I believe that YaST has proven to be a huge asset for non-Linux administrators looking to implement Linux boxes into their workplace. YaST provides a friendly GUI for tasks that would otherwise require some basic Linux command line knowledge. - -SUSE's core focuses are as follows: - -\- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server: This includes task specific solutions ranging from cloud to SAP options, as well as, mission critical computing and software-based data storage. - -\- SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop: For those companies looking to have a solid Linux workstation for their employees, SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop is a great option. And like Red Hat, SUSE provides access to their support offerings via a subscription model. You can choose three different levels of support. - -Why SUSE Linux Enterprise? - -SUSE is a company that sells services around Linux, but they do so by focusing on keeping it simple. From their website down to the distribution of Linux offered by SUSE, the focus is ease of use without sacrificing security or reliability. While there is no question at least here in the States that Red Hat is the standard for servers, SUSE has done quite well for themselves both as a company and as contributing members of the open source community. - -I'll also go on record in suggesting that SUSE doesn't take themselves too seriously, which is a great thing when you're making connections in the world of IT. From their fun music videos about Linux down to the Gecko used in SUSE trade booths for fun photo opportunities, SUSE presents themselves as simple to understand and approachable. - -### Ubuntu LTS Linux - -[Ubuntu Long Term Release][3] (LTS) Linux is a simple to use enterprise grade Linux distribution. Ubuntu sees more frequent (and sometimes less stable) updates than the other distros mentioned above. Don't misunderstand, Ubuntu LTS editions are considered to be quite stable. However I think some experts may disagree if you were to suggest that they're bullet proof. - -Ubuntu's core focuses are as follows: - -\- Ubuntu Desktop: Without question, the Ubuntu desktop is dead simple to learn and get running quickly. What it may lack in advanced installation features, it makes up for with straight forward simplicity. As an added bonus, Ubuntu has more packages available than anyone (except for its father distribution, Debian). I think where Ubuntu really shines is that you can find a number of vendors online that sell Ubuntu pre-installed. This includes servers, desktops and notebooks. - -\- Ubuntu Server: This includes server, cloud and container offerings. Ubuntu also provides an interesting concept with their Juju cloud "app store" offering. Ubuntu Server makes a lot of sense for anyone who is familiar with Ubuntu or Debian. For these individuals, it fits like a glove and provides you with the command line tools you already know and love. - -Ubuntu IoT: Most recently, Ubuntu's development team has taken aim at creation solutions for the "Internet of Things" (IoT). This includes digital signage, robotics and the IoT gateways themselves. My guess is that the bulk of the IoT growth we'll see with Ubuntu will come from enterprise users and not so much from casual home users. - -Why Ubuntu LTS? - -Community is Ubuntu's greatest strength. Both with casual users, in addition to their tremendous growth in the already crowded server market. The development and user communities using Ubuntu are rock solid. So while it may be considered more unstable than other enterprise distros, I've found that locking an Ubuntu LTS installation into a 'security updates only' mode provides a very stable experience. - -### What about CentOS or Scientific Linux? - -First off let's address [CentOS][4] as an enterprise distribution. If you have your own in-house support team to maintain it, then a CentOS installation is a fantastic option. After all, it's compatible with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and offers the same level of stability as Red Hat's offering. Unfortunately it's not going to completely replace a Red Hat support subscription. - -And [Scientific Linux][5]? What about that distribution? Well it's like CentOS, it's based on Red Hat Linux. But unlike CentOS, there is no affiliation with Red Hat. Scientific Linux has one mission from its inception - to provide a common Linux distribution for labs across the world. Today, Scientific Linux is basically Red Hat minus the trademark material included. - -Neither of these distros are truly interchangeable with Red Hat as they lack the Red Hat support component. - -Which of these is the top distro for enterprise? I think that depends on a number of factors that you'd need to figure out for yourself: subscription coverage, availability, cost, services and features offered. These are all considerations each company must determine for themselves. Speaking for myself personally, I think Red Hat wins on the server while SUSE easily wins on the desktop environment. But that's just my opinion - do you disagree? Hit the Comments section below and let's talk about it. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -via: https://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-linux-distros-for-the-enterprise.html - -作者：[Matt Hartley][a] -译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) -校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) - -本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 - -[a]:https://www.datamation.com/author/Matt-Hartley-3080.html -[1]:https://www.redhat.com/en -[2]:https://www.suse.com/ -[3]:http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ -[4]:https://www.centos.org/ -[5]:https://www.scientificlinux.org/ From 17773db1468d59b728e4b12febfd0194019de017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: MjSeven <33125422+MjSeven@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 00:25:32 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] Create 20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md --- ...7 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md | 82 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md diff --git a/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md b/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..204aa2137c --- /dev/null +++ b/translated/tech/20170927 Best Linux Distros for the Enterprise.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +面向企业的最佳 Linux 发行版 +==== + +在这篇文章中，我将分享企业环境下顶级的 Linux 发行版。其中一些发行版与桌面任务一起用于服务器和云环境。所有这些 Linux 选项具有的一个共同点是它们都是企业级 Linux 发行版 -- 所以你可以期待更高程度的功能，当然还有支持。 + +### 什么是企业级的 Linux 发行版？ + +一个企业级的 Linux 发行版可以归结为以下内容 - 稳定性和支持。在企业环境中，使用的 Linux 版本必须满足这两点。稳定性意味着所提供的软件包既稳定又可用，同时仍然保持预期的安全性。 + +企业级的支持因素意味着有一个可靠的支持机制。有时这是单一的（官方）来源，如公司。在其他情况下，它可能是一个非营利性的执政机构，向优秀的第三方支持供应商提供可靠的建议。很明显，前者是最好的选择，但两者都可以接受。 + +### Red Hat 企业级 Linux + +[Red Hat][1] 有很多很棒的产品，都有企业级的支持来保证可用。其核心重点如下： + +- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 服务器：这是一组服务器产品，包括从容器托管到 SAP 服务的所有内容，还有其他衍生的服务器。 +- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 桌面：这些是严格控制的用户环境，运行 Red Hat Linux，提供基本的桌面功能。这些功能包括访问最新的应用程序，如 web 浏览器、电子邮件、LibreOffice 等。 +- Red Hat 企业级 Linux 工作站：这基本上是 Red Hat 企业级 Linux 桌面，但针对高性能任务进行了优化。它也非常适合于大型部署和持续管理。 + +### 为什么选择 Red Hat 企业级 Linux？ + +Red Hat 是一家大型的、非常成功的公司，销售围绕 Linux 的服务。基本上，Red Hat 从那些想要避免供应商锁定和其他相关问题的公司赚钱。这些公司认识到聘用开源软件专家和管理他们的服务器和其他计算需求的价值。一家公司只需要购买订阅，Red Hat 会在支持方面做其余的工作。 + +Red Hat 也是一个可靠的社会公民。他们赞助开源项目，FoSS 支持网站（译注：FoSS 是 Free and Open Source Software 的缩写，意为自由及开源软件），像OpenSource.com 这样的网站，并为 Fedora 项目提供支持。Fedora 不是由 Red Hat 所有，而是它赞助开发的。这使 Fedora 得以发展，同时也使 Red Hat 受益匪浅。Red Hat 可以从 Fedora 项目中获得他们想要的，并将其用于他们的企业级 Linux 产品中。 就目前来看，Fedora 充当了红帽企业 Linux 的上游渠道。 + +### SUSE Linux 企业版本 + +[SUSE][2] 是一家非常棒的公司，为企业用户提供了可靠的 Linux 选项。SUSE 的产品类似于 Red Hat，因为桌面和服务器都是公司关注的。从我自己使用 SUSE 的经验来看，我相信 YaST 已经证明对于希望在工作场所使用 Linux 操作系统的非 Linux 管理员而言，它是一笔巨大的资产。YaST 为那些需要一些基本的 Linux 命令行知识的任务提供了一个友好的 GUI。 + +SUSE 的核心重点如下： + +- SUSE Linux 企业级服务器：包括任务特定的解决方案，从云到 SAP 选项，以及任务关键计算和基于软件的数据存储。 +- SUSE Linux 企业级桌面：对于那些希望为员工提供可靠的 Linux 工作站的公司来说，SUSE Linux 企业级桌面是一个不错的选择。和 Red Hat 一样，SUSE 通过订阅模式来提供对其支持产品的访问。你可以选择三个不同级别的支持。 + +为什么选择 SUSE Linux 企业版？ + +SUSE 是一家围绕 Linux 销售服务的公司，但他们仍然通过专注于简化操作来实现这一目标。从他们的网站到 SUSE 提供的 Linux 发行版，重点是易用性，而不会牺牲安全性或可靠性。尽管在美国毫无疑问 Red Hat 是服务器的标准，但 SUSE 作为公司和开源社区贡献成员都做得很好。 + +我还会继续说，SUSE 不会把自己太当回事。当你在 IT 领域建立联系的时候，这是一件很棒的事情。从他们关于 Linux 的有趣音乐视频到 SUSE 贸易展位中使用的 Gecko 以获得有趣的照片机会，SUSE 将自己描述成简单易懂和平易近人的形象。 + +### Ubuntu LTS Linux + +[Ubuntu Long Term Release][3] (LTS) Linux 是一个简单易用的企业级 Linux 发行版。Ubuntu 看起来比上面提到的其他发行版更新更频繁（有时候也更不稳定）。不要误解，Ubuntu LTS 版本被认为是相当稳定的，不过，我认为一些专家可能不同意你的观点，如果你认为他们是防弹的。（这句不太理解） + +Ubuntu 的核心重点如下： + +- Ubuntu 桌面版：毫无疑问，Ubuntu 桌面非常简单，可以快速学习和快速运行。它在高级安装选项中可能缺少一些东西，但它有一种直截了当的弥补。作为额外的奖励，Ubuntu 相比比其他版本有更多的软件包（除了它的父亲，Debian 发行版）。我认为 Ubuntu 真正的亮点在于，你可以在网上找到许多销售 Ubuntu 的厂商，包括服务器，台式机和笔记本电脑。 +- Ubuntu 服务器版：这包括服务器，云和容器产品。Ubuntu 还提供了 Juju 云“应用商店”这样一个有趣的概念。对于任何熟悉 Ubuntu 或 Debian 的人来说，Ubuntu 服务器都很有意义。对于这些人来说，它就像手套一样，为你提供你已经知道并喜爱的命令行工具。 + +Ubuntu IoT：最近，Ubuntu 的开发团队已经把目标瞄准了“物联网”（IoT）的创建解决方案。包括数字标识、机器人技术和物联网网关。我的猜测是，我们将在 Ubuntu 中看到物联网增长的大部分来自企业用户，而不是普通家庭用户。 + +为什么选择 Ubuntu LTS？ + +社区是 Ubuntu 最大的优点。除了在已经拥挤的服务器市场上的巨大增长之外，它还与普通用户在一起。使用 Ubuntu 开发者和社区用户是坚如磐石的。因此，虽然它可能被认为比其他企业版更不稳定，但是我发现将 Ubuntu LTS 安装锁定到到 “security updates only” 模式下提供了非常稳定的体验。 + +### CentOS 或者 Scientific Linux 怎么样呢？ + +首先，让我们把 [CentOS][4] 作为一个企业发行版，如果你有自己的内部支持团队来维护它，那么安装 CentOS 是一个很好的选择。毕竟，它与 Red Hat 企业级 Linux 兼容，并提供了与 Red Hat 产品相同级别的稳定性。不幸的是，它不会完全取代 Red Hat 支持订阅。 + +那么 [Scientific Linux][5] 呢？它的发行版怎么样？好吧，它就像 CentOS，它是基于 Red Hat Linux 的。但与 CentOS 不同的是，它与 Red Hat 没有任何关系。 Scientific Linux 从一开始就有一个目标 - 为世界各地的实验室提供一个通用的 Linux 发行版。今天，Scientific Linux 基本上是 Red Hat 减去包含的商标资料。 + +这两种发行版都不能真正地与 Red Hat 互换，因为他们缺少 Red Hat 支持组件。 + +哪一个是顶级企业发行版？我认为这取决于你需要为自己确定的许多因素：订阅范围，可用性，成本，服务和提供的功能。这些是每个公司必须自己决定的因素。就我个人而言，我认为 Red Hat 在服务器上获胜，而 SUSE 在桌面环境中轻松获胜，但这只是我的意见 - 你不同意？点击下面的评论部分，让我们来谈谈它。 + + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +via: https://www.datamation.com/open-source/best-linux-distros-for-the-enterprise.html + +作者：[Matt Hartley][a] +译者：[MjSeven](https://github.com/MjSeven) +校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) + +本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 + +[a]:https://www.datamation.com/author/Matt-Hartley-3080.html +[1]:https://www.redhat.com/en +[2]:https://www.suse.com/ +[3]:http://releases.ubuntu.com/16.04/ +[4]:https://www.centos.org/ +[5]:https://www.scientificlinux.org/