document/TranslateProject
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git synced 2025-01-10 22:21:11 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

完成翻译

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
KS 2016-02-24 17:38:38 +08:00
parent ec72d36ec8
commit cbab5e8498
2 changed files with 63 additions and 64 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

64
sources/tech/20160218 Top 4 open source issue tracking tools.md
View File

@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
wyangsun translating
Top 4 open source issue tracking tools
========================================
Life is full of bugs.
No matter how carefully planned, no matter how much time went into design, any project is going to have unforseen issues when the rubber hits the road in the implementation stage. And that's okay. Perhaps the best measure of resiliency for any organization is not how well they handle things when everything is functioning as planned, but rather, how they handle the speed bumps when they come along.
A critical tool for any project management workflow, especially in the software development world, is an issue tracker. The basics are simple; allowing bugs to be opened, tracked, and resolved in a collaborative manner, while making it easy to follow the progress. Beyond the basic functionality, there are a lot of options focused on meeting specific needs, features, and use cases, including software development and beyond. You may be familiar with hosted versions of these tools, like [GitHub Issues](https://guides.github.com/features/issues/) or [Launchpad](https://launchpad.net/), some of which are themselves open source.
So let's take a look at four excellent choices for managing bugs and issues, all open source and all easy to download and host yourself. To be clear, there's no way we could possibly list every issue tracking tool here; instead, these are four of our favorites, based on feature richness and the size of the community behind the project. There are others, to be sure, and if you've got a good case for your favorite not listed here, be sure to let us know which is your favorite tool and what makes it stand out to you, in the comments below.
## Redmine
[Redmine](http://www.redmine.org/) is a popular issue tracking tool built on Ruby on Rails and dating back to 2006. Similar in many regards to Trac, another one of our favorites, Redmine is capable of managing multiple projects and integrates with a number of version control systems. In addition to basic issue tracking, Redmine also offers forums, wikis, time tracking tools, and the ability to generate Gantt charts and calendars to track progress.
Redmine is fairly flexible in its setup, supporting numerous database backends and dozens of languages, and is customizable as well, featuring the ability to add custom fields to issues, users, projects and more. It can be further customized with a number of community-created plugins and themes.
An [online demo](http://demo.redmine.org/) is available if you’d like to try it out. Redmine is licensed as open source under the [GPL version 2](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html); the source code can be found in the project’s [subversion repository](https://svn.redmine.org/redmine) or mirrored on [GitHub](https://github.com/redmine/redmine).
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-redmine.png)
## Bugzilla
[Bugzilla](https://www.bugzilla.org/) is another popular development tool with issue tracking capabilities. As you might have guessed from the name, Bugzilla was originally created by the [Mozilla Foundation](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/) to track bugs in the development of the then-called Netscape Communicator suite. Ported to Perl from its original Tcl routes for greater accessibility, Bugzilla is one of the older and more widely adopted issue tracking systems, as it is used by a number of well-known open source projects like GNOME, KDE, and the Linux kernel itself.
Sporting a number of advanced tools, from notifications to duplicate bug detection to shared searches, Bugzilla is certainly a more feature-rich option. Bugzilla has an advanced search system along with a comprehensive reporting tool, capable of generating charts and automated scheduled reports. Like Redmine, Bugzilla is extensible and customizable, both in the fields themselves as well as featuring the ability to create custom workflows for bugs. It also works with many database backends, and many different languages are supported out of the box.
Bugzilla is licensed under the [Mozilla Public License](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Public_License), and you can read their [future roadmap](https://www.bugzilla.org/status/roadmap.html) and try out a [demo server](https://landfill.bugzilla.org/) on the official website.
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-bugzilla.png)
## Trac
[Trac](http://trac.edgewall.org/browser) describes itself as taking a minimalistic approach to web-based software project management, but don’t confusing minimalism with a lack of features.
Written in Python, Trac tightly integrates its bug tracking capabilities with its wiki system and a revision control system of your choosing. It features project management capabilities like generating milestones and roadmaps, a customizable reporting system, timelines, support for multiple repositories, built-in spam filtering, and is available in many common languages. Like the other bug trackers we have looked at, has a number of plugins available for it extending its base feature set even further.
Trac is made available as open source under a modified [BSD license](http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracLicense), though older versions were released under the GPL. You can view Trac’s source in a [self-hosted repository](http://trac.edgewall.org/browser) or check out their [roadmap](http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracRoadmap) for future plans.
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-trac.png)
## Mantis
[Mantis](https://www.mantisbt.org/) is the final tool we’ll look at in this collection, a PHP-based bug tracker with a sixteen year history. Another bug tracker with support for many different revision control systems and an event-driven notification system, Mantis has a similar feature set to other tools here. While it does not itself contain a wiki, it integrates with many popular wiki platforms and is localized into many languages.
Mantis is licensed as open source under the [GPL version 2](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html); you can browse its source code on [GitHub](https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt) or check out the self-hosted [roadmap](https://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/roadmap_page.php?project=mantisbt&version=1.3.x) for future plans. For a demo, you can check out their own internal [bug tracker](https://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/my_view_page.php).
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-mantis.png)
As we notes, these four are not the only options. Looking to explore some others? [Apache Bloodhound](https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/), [Fossil](http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki), [The Bug Genie](http://www.thebuggenie.com/), and many alternatives all have dedicated followings, each with different strengths and weaknesses. In addtion, some of the tools in our [project management](https://opensource.com/business/15/1/top-project-management-tools-2015) roundup have issue tracking capabilities. So, which is your preferred tool for tracking and squashing bugs?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://opensource.com/business/16/2/top-issue-support-and-bug-tracking-tools
作者：[Jason Baker][a]
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]:https://opensource.com/users/jason-baker

63
translated/tech/20160218 Top 4 open source issue tracking tools.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
排名前4的开源问题追踪工具
========================================
生活充满了漏洞。
无论怎样小心计划，无论花多少时间去设计，在执行阶段当轮胎压在路上，任何工程都会有未知的问题。也无妨。也许对于任何一个组织的最佳衡量弹性不是他们如何一切都按计划运行地处理事情，而是，当出现磕磕碰碰时他们处理速度。
一个任意工程管理流程的关键工具，特别是在软件开发领域，是一个问题追踪系统。基础很简单；允许漏洞在合作的方式被打开，追踪，和解决，同时很容易跟随进展。除了基本功能，还有很多专注于满足特定需求的选择，和使用案例，包括软件开发和更多。你可能熟悉托管版本的这些工具，像 [GitHub Issues](https://guides.github.com/features/issues/)或者[Launchpad](https://launchpad.net/)，这些是他们自己开放的资源。
让我们看一看四个管理漏洞和问题的优秀选择，全部开源代码、易于下载和自我托管。要清楚，我们可能没有办法在这里列出每一个问题跟踪工具；然而，这有四个我们偏爱的，基于功能丰富和项目背后的社区项目的规模。还有其他，可以肯定的是，如果你有一个好的理由你喜欢的没有列在这里,一定要让我们知道这是你最喜欢的工具,在下面的评论中使它脱颖而出。
## Redmine
[Redmine](http://www.redmine.org/) 是一个流行的问题追踪工具建立在Ruby on Rails和可以追溯到2006年。很多类似于Trac，另一方面我们最爱的是，Redmine可以管理多个项目然后整合了多种版本控制系统。除了基本问题追踪，Redmine也提供论坛，wiki，时间跟踪工具，和生成甘特图和日历的能力来跟踪项目的进展。
Redmine的设置相当灵活，支持多种数据库后端和几十种语言，还是可定制的，可以添加自定义字段到问题，用户，工程和更多。通过社区创建的插件和主题它可以进一步定制。
如果你想试一试，一个[在线演示](http://demo.redmine.org/)可提供使用。Redmine在开源[GPL版本2](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html)下许可；开源代码可以在工程的[svn仓库](https://svn.redmine.org/redmine)或在[GitHub](https://github.com/redmine/redmine)镜像上找到。
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-redmine.png)
## Bugzilla
[Bugzilla](https://www.bugzilla.org/)是另一个流行的有问题追踪功能的开发工具。从名字您可能已经猜到了，Bugzilla最初是[Mozilla基金会](https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/)创建，用来跟踪当时称为网景通信套件开发漏洞的。为了更好的通过性从原来的Tcl移植到Perl路径，Bugzilla是一个比较老的和更广泛采用的问题跟踪系统，因为它用在许多著名的开源项目如GNOME，KDE，Linux内核本身。
拥有一些先进的工具，从通知到共享搜索重复的漏洞检测，Bugzilla是一个功能更丰富的选项。Bugzilla有高级搜索系统与全面的报表工具，生成图表和自动化计划报告的能力。像Redmine，Bugzilla是可扩展和可定制的，两者在字段本身像能创建自定义漏洞工作流一样。它也支持多种后端数据库，和自带的多语言支持。
Bugzilla在[Mozilla公共许可证](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Public_License)下许可，你可以读取他们[未来路线图](https://www.bugzilla.org/status/roadmap.html)还有在官网测试一个[示例服务](https://landfill.bugzilla.org/)
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-bugzilla.png)
## Trac
[Trac](http://trac.edgewall.org/browser)自称是使用基于web简单的方法的软件工程管理软件，但不要混淆极简主义与缺乏功能。
python编写，Trac紧密结合它的漏洞跟踪与它的wiki系统和你选择的版本控制系统。项目管理能力突出，如生成的里程碑和路线图，一个可定制的报表系统，大事记，支持多资源库，内置的垃圾邮件过滤，还可以使用很多一般的语言。如其他漏洞追踪软件我们已经看到，有很多插件可进一步扩展其基本特性。
Trac是在改进的[BSD许可](http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracLicense)下获得开放源码许可，虽然更老的版本发布在GPL下。你可以在一个[自托管仓库](http://trac.edgewall.org/browser)预览Trac的源码或者查看他们的[路线图](http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracRoadmap)对未来的规划。
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-trac.png)
## Mantis
[Mantis](https://www.mantisbt.org/)是这次收集中我们将看的最后一个工具，一个基于PHP且有16年历史的漏洞跟踪工具。另外漏洞跟踪支持多种不同的版本控制系统和一个事件驱动的通知系统，Mantis有一个与其他工具类似的功能设置。虽然它不本身包含一个wiki，它整合很多流行的wiki平台且本地化到多种语言。
Mantis在[GPL版本2](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html)下获得开源许可证书；你可以在[GitHub](https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt)浏览他的源代码或查看自托管[路线图](https://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/roadmap_page.php?project=mantisbt&version=1.3.x)对未来的规划。一个示例，你可以查看他们的内部[漏洞跟踪](https://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/my_view_page.php)。
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/images/business-uploads/issues-mantis.png)
正如我们指出的，这四个不是唯一的选项。想要探索更多？[Apache Bloodhound](https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/)，[Fossil](http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki)，[The Bug Genie](http://www.thebuggenie.com/)，还有很多可替换品都有专注的追随者，每个都有不同的优点和缺点。另外，一些工具在我们[项目管理](https://opensource.com/business/15/1/top-project-management-tools-2015)摘要有问题跟踪功能。所以，哪个是你首选的跟踪和挤压漏洞的工具？
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://opensource.com/business/16/2/top-issue-support-and-bug-tracking-tools
作者：[Jason Baker][a]
译者：[wyangsun](https://github.com/wyangsun)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]:https://opensource.com/users/jason-baker