mirror of
https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git
synced 2025-01-13 22:30:37 +08:00
Update 20220205 Brave vs Vivaldi- Which Chromium-Based Browser is Better.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
5eb98ca567
commit
b8e208a6f6
@ -7,122 +7,124 @@
|
||||
[#]: publisher: " "
|
||||
[#]: url: " "
|
||||
|
||||
Brave vs Vivaldi: Which Chromium-Based Browser is Better?
|
||||
Brave vs Vivaldi:哪个浏览器更好?
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
Brave is undoubtedly an impressive open-source web browser.
|
||||
Brave,毫无疑问,是一款出色的开源网页浏览器。它也是 [适用于 Linux 的最佳网页浏览器][1] 之一。
|
||||
|
||||
It is also one of the [best browsers available for Linux][1]. Vivaldi, on the other hand, has been making the rounds among Linux users for its customizability, and tab management features.
|
||||
另一方面,Vivaldi 凭借其自定义能力和标签页管理功能,在 Linux 用户群中获得了不错的声誉。
|
||||
|
||||
Is Vivaldi worth a try? Is it open-source? Why should you prefer Brave over it? Or should you consider using Vivaldi?
|
||||
Vivaldi 是否值得一试?它开源吗?为什么你会更喜欢 Brave 而不是它?或者,是否应该考虑使用 Vivaldi 呢?
|
||||
|
||||
Here, I shall answer all those questions, comparing both of them side-by-side.
|
||||
在此,我将解答上述所有问题,并对这两款浏览器进行并列比较。
|
||||
|
||||
### User Interface
|
||||
### 用户界面
|
||||
|
||||
![][2]
|
||||
|
||||
Both the web browser offer different user experiences, even if they are based on open-source Chromium code.
|
||||
虽然这两款网页浏览器都是基于开源的 Chromium 代码,但是它们提供了不同的用户体验。
|
||||
|
||||
Brave focuses on providing a neat look, while Vivaldi try their best to provide more functionality.
|
||||
Brave 专注于提供简洁的外观,而 Vivaldi 则尽力提供更多的功能。
|
||||
|
||||
If you do not want a lot of distractions, and just want to focus on web browsing, Brave should give you a clean experience.
|
||||
如果你不想受到大量干扰,只想专心浏览网页,那么 Brave 应该能给你提供清爽的体验。
|
||||
|
||||
Even then, Brave gives you a lot of control to customize the existing interface. For instance, the ability to use a wide address bar, show full URLs, show tab search button, show/hide home button, and more.
|
||||
不过,Brave 依旧为你提供定制现有界面的选项,例如使用更宽的地址栏、显示完整 URL、显示标签搜索按钮、显示或隐藏主页按钮等。
|
||||
|
||||
![][3]
|
||||
|
||||
When it comes to themes, Brave offers light and dark out of the box but supports themes available in the Chrome Store.
|
||||
说到主题,Brave 默认提供了亮色和暗色两款主题,同时也支持 Chrome 应用商店中的主题。
|
||||
|
||||
In contrast, Vivaldi might look a bit filled up out of the box with a quick access panel, search bar to the right of the address bar, and more elements at the bottom of the browser.
|
||||
反观另一边,Vivaldi 默认情况下看上去似乎有点超负荷 —— 能够快速访问的侧边栏,地址栏右边的搜索框,再加上浏览器底部还有更多要素。
|
||||
|
||||
Vivaldi also features more themes by default. Not to forget, you can seamlessly edit/customize the theme, which you cannot in Brave.
|
||||
Vivaldi 默认也会提供更多主题。别忘了,你可以无缝编辑并定制主题,Brave 可没有这种功能哦。
|
||||
|
||||
![][4]
|
||||
|
||||
For someone looking for a straightforward and customizable web browser, Brave is an easy recommendation. And, for users wanting a rich user interface with a variety of options accessible, Vivaldi should be a good choice.
|
||||
对于那些想要一款简洁明了,同时可以自定义的浏览器的人来说,Brave 就是一款简洁的推荐项。而对于那些需要丰富的界面和大量设置项的用户来说,Vivaldi 是个不错的选择。
|
||||
|
||||
### Open Source vs 99% Open-Source
|
||||
### 完全开源 vs 99% 开源
|
||||
|
||||
Brave is completely open-source and free to use. You can find its code at GitHub and fork it for experiments and tests, if required.
|
||||
Brave 是完全开源的,可以免费 / 自由使用。你可以在 GitHub 上查看它的源代码,如果需要的话还可以复刻(Fork)一份代码以用于实验和测试。
|
||||
|
||||
Vivaldi is err.. almost open-source. The entire browser is based on Chromium, and its code is available in its official site. However, the user interface of the browser is proprietary.
|
||||
Vivaldi 的话,呃……只能说是几乎开源。整个浏览器基于 Chromium 开发,而修改过的 Chromium 源代码可以在它的官网中找到。不过,这款浏览器的用户界面却是专有的。
|
||||
|
||||
To ensure that they provide you a unique user experience and keep their control over it, Vivaldi decided to keep the UI closed-source.
|
||||
为确保提供独特的用户体验,并保持对它的控制权,Vivaldi 决定让用户界面闭源。
|
||||
|
||||
However, they do explain it well in a [blog post][5].
|
||||
不过,他们在一篇 [博文][5] 中解释得很清楚。
|
||||
|
||||
### Tab Management
|
||||
### 标签页管理
|
||||
|
||||
![][6]
|
||||
|
||||
For most users, this may not be a comparison criterion. But, considering Vivaldi is popular for its tab management ability, it is worth pointing it out.
|
||||
对于大多数用户来说,这可能不算是一个比较标准,但考虑到 Vivaldi 以其标签页管理功能为知名,因此这一点仍旧值得比较。
|
||||
|
||||
Tab management comes in handy when you have loads of tabs active. If you have a handful of tabs in use, you do not need to both about tab management capabilities, but it can still be useful.
|
||||
在你打开了许多标签页时,标签页管理就会大有用场。如果你只开了少量的标签页,那你不需要同时考虑标签页管理,但它仍旧十分有用。
|
||||
|
||||
With Vivaldi, you can have two-level stacked tabs together, and have several stacked tab groups. You can also reposition the tabs from the top of the browser to the left/right/bottom side of the browser.
|
||||
有了 Vivaldi,你可以体验两级堆叠标签栏,同时还可以拥有多个堆叠标签组。你还可以将标签栏从浏览器的顶部移动到左 / 右 / 底部。
|
||||
|
||||
The default behavior of the tabs can be managed, stacked tabs can be changed into accordion-style, the width can be adjusted, the buttons can be customized to be visible/hide, and lots more.
|
||||
标签的默认行为都可以修改。紧凑标签组可以修改为折叠式,标签宽度可以更改,按钮可选择显示或隐藏,还有许多配置项。
|
||||
|
||||
Brave also lets you group tabs, assign color, name them, and expand/collapse to easily manage several tab groups.
|
||||
Brave 同样可以分组标签、指定颜色、命名标签组,以及展开 / 折叠标签组,以便管理。
|
||||
|
||||
![brave tab management][7]
|
||||
![Brave 的标签页管理][7]
|
||||
|
||||
However, you do not get to see any two-level tab stack functionality nor the ability to customize the tab behavior like you get to see in Vivaldi.
|
||||
不过,在 Brave 里就没有 Vivaldi 那样的两级标签栏,以及自定义标签行为的功能。
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, the tab management with Brave (with dark mode on) looks a bit messy in my opinion.
|
||||
此外,我个人认为 Brave 的标签管理(在开启暗色模式时)看上去有一点点乱。
|
||||
|
||||
Sure, you can decide what the new tab page shows, but that’s not really as useful as the options available in Vivaldi.
|
||||
当然,你可以决定新标签页展示什么内容,但这远远不及 Vivaldi 大量选项那么有用。
|
||||
|
||||
So, Vivaldi is a clear winner when it comes to tab management. But, it depends on your requirements. If you do not juggle between multiple tabs, you probably do not need anything special.
|
||||
所以,在标签页管理这一方面,Vivaldi 明显完胜。不过,一切仍取决于你的实际需求。如果你不在多个标签页中反复横跳,那你其实也不需要什么额外的东西。
|
||||
|
||||
### Other Features
|
||||
### 其他功能
|
||||
|
||||
While both offer all the essential features, you will find some unique offerings.
|
||||
两款浏览器都提供了所有基本功能,但你仍旧可以发现许多区别。
|
||||
|
||||
Brave supports IPFS protocol to help you fight against censorship. You also get the ability to use Brave Rewards, and get tokens for the privacy-friendly ads pushed by Brave. These rewards can help you contribute back to websites as tips. The tokens can also be used to purchase as per the available merchant partners with Brave.
|
||||
Brave 支持 IPFS 协议,以帮助你对抗审查。你也可以使用 Brave Rewards,并通过由 Brave 提供的尊重隐私的广告来获取代币。这些奖励可作为赞助费用,以支持网站的创作者。这些代币同样也可以用于购买来自合作伙伴的 Brave 周边。
|
||||
|
||||
![][8]
|
||||
|
||||
Brave Search is the default search engine with Brave web browser. Even though the search engine is not open-source, the features offered by Brave Search make it an interesting alternative to other popular private search engines.
|
||||
Brave 搜索是 Brave 浏览器的默认搜索引擎。虽然这款搜索引擎并非开源,但 Brave 搜索所带来的功能足以使其成为其他隐私保护型搜索引擎的有趣替代品。
|
||||
|
||||
When it comes to Vivaldi, it offers a range of extra features like the web panel in the sidebar, pomodoro, page tiling, calendar integration, email integration, RSS feed, and more.
|
||||
来到 Vivaldi 这边,它提供了大量额外功能,包括侧边栏的 Web 面板、番茄钟、页面平铺、日历集成、电子邮箱集成、RSS 订阅等。
|
||||
|
||||
The sidebar (or web panel) lets you quickly access things without needing to open a separate tab or window, which should let you easily multitask without losing focus on the active tab.
|
||||
侧边栏(或者叫 Web 面板)允许你快速访问内容,不需额外新建标签或窗口,让你轻松进行多任务处理,而不会失去对活跃标签的专注。
|
||||
|
||||
![][9]
|
||||
|
||||
You also get an in-built translation feature that gets rid of the need to use Google Translate in case you do not understand a language across the web.
|
||||
当然,它还有内置的翻译功能,让你能在不懂网站的语言时摆脱 Google 翻译。
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to all other features, it lets you tweak keyboard shortcuts, mouse gestures, and a variety of quick commands. You do not find anything like this in Brave.
|
||||
除了这些功能以外,Vivaldi 允许你修改键盘快捷键、鼠标手势,以及大量快捷命令。在 Brave 里可没有这些东西。
|
||||
|
||||
So, I’d say Vivaldi is a comfortable option for keyboard shortcut users.
|
||||
因此,我认为 Vivaldi 对于喜欢键盘快捷键的人来说是一个不错的选择。
|
||||
|
||||
### The Privacy Angle
|
||||
### 隐私一角
|
||||
|
||||
![][10]
|
||||
|
||||
Vivaldi focuses on providing a privacy-friendly web experience, just like Brave. You get native ad/tracking protection and a dedicated privacy menu to adjust your experience.
|
||||
Vivaldi 专注于提供隐私友好型网络体验,就和 Brave 一样。它内置了原生的广告 / 跟踪拦截保护,以及专门用于自行调整体验的隐私设置。
|
||||
|
||||
As you can notice in the screenshot above, you can enable/disable the Google services being used for security, hide typed history, change the behavior of saving browsing history, and tweak the default website permissions.
|
||||
就如上方的截图那样,你可以选择启用或禁用谷歌的安全服务,隐藏输入历史,修改历史记录的存储行为,并修改默认的网站权限。
|
||||
|
||||
![][11]
|
||||
|
||||
Brave also gives you a similar level of control, and some advanced options like changing the WebRTC IP policy, and push messaging service controls.
|
||||
Brave 同样给你类似的控制级别,当然也有更高级的设置项,比如修改 WebRTC IP 处理政策,以及消息推送服务控制。
|
||||
|
||||
If you are just looking for anti-tracker and ad blocking capabilities, both browsers offer that. But, if you are worried about something specific, you might want to explore through the settings to be able to decide it for yourself.
|
||||
如果你单纯想要拦截跟踪器和广告的功能,那么两款浏览器都有。不过,如果你更担心某项特定需求,那你可以试着查看它们的设置项,然后自行决定。
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance
|
||||
### 性能
|
||||
|
||||
![][12]
|
||||
|
||||
As usual, I tested the browsers using some of the popular benchmark tests like: [JetStream 2][13], [Speedometer 2.0][14], and [Basemark Web 3.0][15].
|
||||
一如既往,我借助一些知名的跑分工具来测试浏览器的性能,例如:[JetStream 2][13]、[Speedometer 2.0][14] 和 [Basemark Web 3.0][15]。
|
||||
|
||||
I utilized Pop!_OS 21.10 as my Linux distribution, and the browser versions tested were **Vivaldi 5.0.2497.51 stable** and Brave **97.0.4692.99**.
|
||||
我使用 Pop!_OS 21.10 作为我的 Linux 发行版,而测试的浏览器版本为 **Vivaldi 5.0.2497.51 稳定版** 和 Brave **97.0.4692.99**。
|
||||
|
||||
In these synthetic benchmarks, Brave turned out to be a tad bit faster overall, and Vivaldi managed to score better for the Speedometer 2.0 test.
|
||||
在这些基准跑分测试中,Brave 总体会更快,但 Vivaldi 在 Speedometer 2.0 中得分更高。
|
||||
|
||||
To give you an idea, I had nothing running in the background, except the browser on my PC powered by **Intel i5-11600k @4.7 GHz, 32 GB 3200 MHz RAM, and 1050ti Nvidia Graphics**
|
||||
给你一个概念,我后台没有运行任何程序,只运行了浏览器。电脑配置为 **英特尔 15-11600K @4.7GHz,32GB 3200 MHz 运存,英伟达 1050Ti 显卡**。
|
||||
|
||||
因此,
|
||||
|
||||
So, both browsers should be good enough for a snappy web experience.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -162,14 +164,14 @@ via: https://itsfoss.com/brave-vs-vivaldi/
|
||||
|
||||
作者:[Ankush Das][a]
|
||||
选题:[lujun9972][b]
|
||||
译者:[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
|
||||
译者:[imgradeone](https://github.com/imgradeone)
|
||||
校对:[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||
|
||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译,[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||
|
||||
[a]: https://itsfoss.com/author/ankush/
|
||||
[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972
|
||||
[1]: https://itsfoss.com/best-browsers-ubuntu-linux/
|
||||
[1]: https://linux.cn/article-14075-1.html
|
||||
[2]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/brave-vivaldi-ui.png?resize=784%2C600&ssl=1
|
||||
[3]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/brave-appearance-settings.png?resize=800%2C519&ssl=1
|
||||
[4]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/vivaldi-themes-default.png?resize=800%2C580&ssl=1
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user