document/TranslateProject
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git synced 2024-12-26 21:30:55 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

20220707 删除过时新闻

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
lkxed 2022-07-07 23:56:26 +08:00
parent 526b2854da
commit b6e2cc1c49
2 changed files with 0 additions and 132 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

40
sources/news/20220701 An Open Source Organisation Has Left GitHub And Encourages You To Do The Same.md
View File

@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
[#]: subject: "An Open Source Organisation Has Left GitHub And Encourages You To Do The Same"
[#]: via: "https://www.opensourceforu.com/2022/07/an-open-source-organisation-has-left-github-and-encourages-you-to-do-the-same/"
[#]: author: "Laveesh Kocher https://www.opensourceforu.com/author/laveesh-kocher/"
[#]: collector: "lkxed"
[#]: translator: " "
[#]: reviewer: " "
[#]: publisher: " "
[#]: url: " "
An Open Source Organisation Has Left GitHub And Encourages You To Do The Same
======
![sfc][1]
The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC), a non-profit dedicated to free and open source software (FOSS), has announced that it will no longer use Microsoft’s GitHub for project hosting and is urging other software developers to do the same. Denver Gingerich, SFC FOSS licence compliance engineer, and Bradley M. Kuhn, SFC policy fellow, wrote in a [blog][2] post on Thursday that GitHub has come to play a dominant role in FOSS development over the last decade by building an interface and social features around Git, the widely used open source version control software. They claim that by doing so, the company has persuaded FOSS developers to contribute to the development of a proprietary service that leverages FOSS.
“We are ending all our own uses of GitHub, and announcing a long-term plan to assist FOSS projects to migrate away from GitHub,” said Gingerich and Kuhn.
The SFC says it mostly uses self-hosted Git repositories, but it does use GitHub to mirror its repos. The SFC has added a Give Up on GitHub section to its website and is encouraging FOSS developers to switch to a different code hosting service voluntarily.
GitHub claims 83 million users and more than 200 million repositories, many of which are licenced under an open source licence. The cloud hosting service specifically promotes open source development. The SFC’s decision to leave GitHub was prompted by the general availability of GitHub Copilot, an AI coding assistant tool. According to the SFC, GitHub’s decision to release a for-profit product based on FOSS code is “too much to bear.” Based on OpenAI’s Codex, Copilot suggests code and functions to developers as they work. According to GitHub, it can do so because it was trained “on natural language text and source code from publicly available sources, including code in public repositories on GitHub.”
Gingerich and Kuhn see this as a problem because Microsoft and GitHub have refused to answer questions about the copyright implications of training its AI system on public code, why Copilot was trained on FOSS code but not copyrighted Windows code, and whether the company can specify all software licences and copyright holders associated with code used in the training data set. Kuhn has previously expressed his concern that Copilot’s training may pose legal risks, and others have expressed similar concerns. Matthew Butterick, a designer, programmer, and attorney, published a blog post last week in which he stated that he agrees with those who claim Copilot is an engine for violating open source licences.
Such claims have not been settled and are unlikely to be until actual litigation and judgement are obtained. Other attorneys point out that GitHub’s Terms of Service allow it to use hosted code to improve the service. And, without a doubt, legal experts at Microsoft and GitHub believe they are exempt from licence compliance, which they pass on to those who use Copilot to generate code.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://www.opensourceforu.com/2022/07/an-open-source-organisation-has-left-github-and-encourages-you-to-do-the-same/
作者：[Laveesh Kocher][a]
选题：[lkxed][b]
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]: https://www.opensourceforu.com/author/laveesh-kocher/
[b]: https://github.com/lkxed
[1]: https://www.opensourceforu.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/sfc-e1656663655825.jpg
[2]: https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2022/jun/30/give-up-github-launch/

92
sources/news/20220701 Pine64 Is Now Working On A Powerful RISC-V Single Board Computer.md
View File

@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
[#]: subject: "Pine64 Is Now Working On A Powerful RISC-V Single Board Computer"
[#]: via: "https://news.itsfoss.com/pine64-riscv/"
[#]: author: "Jacob Crume https://news.itsfoss.com/author/jacob/"
[#]: collector: "lkxed"
[#]: translator: " "
[#]: reviewer: " "
[#]: publisher: " "
[#]: url: " "
Pine64 Is Now Working On A Powerful RISC-V Single Board Computer
======
Pine64’s hinted at a new RISC-V based single board computer. This should be interesting!
![pine64][1]
Pine64, the single board computer manufacturer known for their range of open-source-supporting [phones][2], laptops, smartwatches, and, of course, SBCs, has recently revealed that they are working on a new RISC-V powered computer.
This isn’t the first time Pine64 has dabbled in the realm of RISC-V; the Pinecil soldering iron and the Pinecone IoT board are both powered by RISC-V. However, this offering promises to be different, with desktop-class performance.
### What To Expect?
As Pine64 pointed out in their [announcement][3], some details haven’t been finalized yet, and they haven’t revealed everything yet. However, this is what we do know now:
* Similar performance to the Quartz64
* 133mm x 80mm footprint
* 4 or 8 GB RAM
* USB 3.0
* Open PCIe slot
* One or two Gigabit Ethernet ports
* Vulkan 1.2 and OpenGL 1.1/2.0/3.x support
As you may have noticed, “similar performance to the Quartz64” is a little unambiguous. However, it does at least give us an indication of the performance.
Well, they aim for this to be an affordable option and a decently powerful one.
However, all this power is useless if there’s no IO for it to interact with. Fortunately, the board should have a similar layout to Pine64’s other boards, so at least have a general idea of the I/O.
If it is anything like the Quartz 64, I expect three to four USB ports, one or two of which will be USB 3.0. Additionally, there should be one HDMI connector, as well as a MIPI-DSI interface. In terms of PCIe, there is going to be an open slot on the board. In line with previous boards, this is likely to be a PCIe 2.0 1x slot, opening up possibilities for NVMe SSDs and other PC expansion cards.
Overall, I expect this board to be quite powerful for an SBC, and especially a RISC-V-powered one. It should be an interesting one for sure!
### How Much Does It Cost?
With most new and niche technologies, generally comes a higher price tag. Fortunately, this does not appear to be the case with this new SBC, as Pine64 has confirmed a general price range.
> The board will premiere in our signature model-A form factor, feature CPU performance which falls somewhere in the neighbourhood of the Quartz64, offer plenty of IO, and sport a price-tag similar to that of the Quartz64.
Considering that the Quartz64 has a price tag of 60 USD for the 4 GB model, I expect a price somewhere in the range of $70 – $80 for the 4 GB, and $90 – $100 for the 8 GB model.
This is all around the same price as the equivalent Raspberry Pi’s, while offering more features and an exciting new architecture.
### A Riddle for the Name
In signature Pine64 style, we don’t yet know what it will be called. However, they have left us a riddle:
> **Victoria Line Station** \
> *I sing, act and dance* \
> *celebrated by them all* \
> *I never climb my stage* \
> *but I sometimes fall* \
> *In the sea I dwell* \
> *and in every magic book* \
> *By heaven!* \
> *adding 64 is all it took* \
> *On my stage I shine* \
> *and when I feel truly blue* \
> *then there’s nothing* \
> *This is the final clue*
Although I am still clueless as to what it means, there are a few hints. First, they are likely to continue naming their SBCs after certain natural materials. Think pine64, Rock64, Quartz64. When combined with the information provided in the riddle, I’m sure someone will be able to guess it correctly. And, that person is promised to get the first board off the production line for free!
If you want to have a crack, all you need to do is post your guess on the [Pine64 announcement page’s comments][4].
Overall, I’m really excited to see what this board is going to turn out like, and I’m optimistic about its performance. I’ll be sure to grab one as soon as they’re available!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://news.itsfoss.com/pine64-riscv/
作者：[Jacob Crume][a]
选题：[lkxed][b]
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]: https://news.itsfoss.com/author/jacob/
[b]: https://github.com/lkxed
[1]: https://news.itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/pine64-working-on-a-powerful-risv-sbc.jpg
[2]: https://news.itsfoss.com/pinephone-review/
[3]: https://www.pine64.org/2022/06/28/june-update-who-likes-risc-v/
[4]: https://www.pine64.org/2022/06/28/june-update-who-likes-risc-v/