diff --git a/sources/tech/20170111 Git in 2016.md b/sources/tech/20170111 Git in 2016.md
index 95df7aa668..dd82429fae 100644
--- a/sources/tech/20170111 Git in 2016.md	
+++ b/sources/tech/20170111 Git in 2016.md	
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
 
 
+tranlating by xiaow6
 Git in 2016
 ============================================================
 
  ![](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*1SiSsLMsNSyAk6khb63W9g.png)
- 
- 
+
+
 Git had a  _huge_  year in 2016, with five feature releases[¹][57] ( _v2.7_  through  _v2.11_ ) and sixteen patch releases[²][58]. 189 authors[³][59] contributed 3,676 commits[⁴][60] to `master`, which is up 15%[⁵][61] over 2015! In total, 1,545 files were changed with 276,799 lines added and 100,973 lines removed[⁶][62].
 
 However, commit counts and LOC are pretty terrible ways to measure productivity. Until deep learning develops to the point where it can qualitatively grok code, we’re going to be stuck with human judgment as the arbiter of productivity.
@@ -632,7 +633,6 @@ Or if you can’t wait ’til then, head over to Atlassian’s excellent selecti
 
  _If you scrolled to the end looking for the footnotes from the first paragraph, please jump to the _ [ _[Citation needed]_ ][77] _ section for the commands used to generate the stats. Gratuitous cover image generated using _ [ _instaco.de_ ][78] _ ❤️_ 
 
-
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 via: https://hackernoon.com/git-in-2016-fad96ae22a15#.t5c5cm48f