document/TranslateProject
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git synced 2025-01-22 23:00:57 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #24825 from geekpi/translating

Browse Source 
translated
This commit is contained in:
geekpi 2022-03-01 08:49:04 +08:00 committed by GitHub
commit 9c655b11d6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 258 additions and 257 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

257
sources/tech/20220224 KDE vs GNOME- What-s the Ultimate Linux Desktop Choice.md
View File

@ -1,257 +0,0 @@
[#]: subject: "KDE vs GNOME: What’s the Ultimate Linux Desktop Choice?"
[#]: via: "https://itsfoss.com/kde-vs-gnome/"
[#]: author: "Ankush Das https://itsfoss.com/author/ankush/"
[#]: collector: "lujun9972"
[#]: translator: "geekpi"
[#]: reviewer: " "
[#]: publisher: " "
[#]: url: " "
KDE vs GNOME: What’s the Ultimate Linux Desktop Choice?
======
When it comes to Linux, the desktop environment is a big deal. 
A desktop environment makes up the graphical user interface (GUI) along with a set of applications that you get on your Linux distribution.
You can go through our [article explaining what a desktop environment is][1].
Choosing a good desktop environment can help you improve productivity, workflow, ease of use, and the overall experience.
And, among the [best desktop environments][2], KDE and GNOME are particularly popular. Here, I plan to highlight the key differences to help you decide.
### The User Interface: Functionality vs Look
The user interface generally involves the type of layout, icons, theme, widgets, and other components of a GUI.
KDE aims to provide a traditional desktop layout that’s comfortable for most Windows users. 
![][3]
Don’t let that fool you, though—it is simple to look at but focused on more functionalities. 
In fact, Windows has taken inspiration from KDE for some of its UI improvements, like the ability to adjust the volume by scrolling the volume icon in the taskbar.
![][4]
And, KDE is known for its consistent look and feel, even with numerous improvements over the years.
GNOME, on the other hand, provides a unique desktop experience. GNOME should suit you well if you are looking for a different and modern user interface design.
The icons/theme/wallpapers may look better regarding modern standards. There’s a take on preferences, but GNOME looks more attractive, in my opinion.
![][5]
However, adjusting the workflow could take a while if you are already comfortable with the traditional Windows-like layout.
There’s no start/app/menu button here; you have to click on the Activity Overview to access your workspaces (or virtual desktops) and access the app menu from the same place.
To some, it might look cleaner without a taskbar, but it is up to your preferences.
Note that the UI may not be as functional and rich compared to KDE. For instance, the widgets in the system tray offer way more options than you get with the applets on GNOME.
![GNOME 41][6]
So, in terms of UI, KDE vs GNOME does not have a clear winner but depends on your requirements for functionality or a modern look.
### App Ecosystem
With KDE, you get access to [countless utilities][7]. 
You will probably be overwhelmed with the applications available for KDE by KDE.
![][8]
In addition to that, the entire KDE community is super busy adding new applications and tools to the arsenal.
Many of them stand out among the available applications like Krita, Kdenlive, Kate Editor, and more. 
GNOME also features [numerous applications][9] by default. While it could be a sufficient list for most users, it falls short on the catalog compared to KDE.
![][10]
I do not find myself using many apps by GNOME.
And, it is worth noting that the KDE applications that come with the desktop environment get faster improvements when compared to GNOME’s default applications.
It is just a personal observation, considering the development updates by KDE when compared to GNOME applications. However, this can change with time.
### What’s Best for Customization?
KDE is the superior choice if you want to tinker and take control of the user experience.
Don’t take my word for it; you can follow our [KDE customization guide][11] to know the available options.
![][12]
Not just the ability to customize, but you get a lot of control out-of-the-box for changing the theme, color, workspace effects, window management, and more without the need for any particular application/extension.
For some, the availability of options may not make a difference if you want to stick to the stock experience, no matter what.
As for GNOME, you do not get a lot of out-of-the-box controls. Instead, you will have to rely on GNOME Tweaks or extensions to make some changes. But, yes, you can customize the experience to a good extent.
![][13]
Also, note that [GNOME 42][14] was not available as a stable release at the time of writing this. So, you can expect a system-wide dark mode implementation and some improvements in look/feel.
Of course, it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison, considering both offer different GUI elements and layouts. However, KDE gets the pick for users who want more control and customization options.
GNOME is suitable for users who do not want many options. If you like what GNOME offers and are willing to customize the experience with extra effort, you can also do that.
#### Extra Abilities: KDE vs GNOME
As mentioned earlier, GNOME offers [extensions to add more functionality][15] to your current configuration.
You can head to [GNOME’s shell extension website][16] to explore options, or take a look at our [list of the best gnome extensions][17].
![][18]
GNOME extensions make it easy to do a bunch of stuff, like automating what workspace an app launches using the auto-move window switcher.
There are all kinds of extensions to improve your workflow and make things easy.
However, the extensions depend on the GNOME shell version. Moreover, due to radical changes from one version to another, GNOME extensions could stop working with future releases.
On the other hand, KDE offers a bag full of add-ons, widgets, and application add-ons as well.
![][19]
Unlike GNOME’s inconvenient way of adding extensions from a browser (using another browser extension), you can access KDE’s add-ons using the Discover software center directly.
![][20]
So, it becomes a seamless experience to add extra functionality or a theme without following a separate set of steps.
Not to forget, tools like KDE Connect offer extra abilities, letting you connect your phone with your PC.
Overall, you can extend functionalities on both, but if you want more options, KDE takes the edge.
#### Accessibility Options
While KDE does a fantastic job on several aspects, the available abilities to enhance the accessibility of the desktop are extremely limited (like the absence of a screen reader out of the box).
![][21]
It is a possibility that the developers are testing the screen reader functionality with the Orca Screen Reader app, hearing/visual aids for the desktop, but with KDE Plasma 5.24, it’s not useful enough.
As one of our readers pointed out, KDE can’t talk before or after installation. So, it’s a not an option for them.
However, GNOME does a better job with the availability of a screen reader, visual alerts, screen keyboard, sound keys, click assist, and more options.
![][22]
So, if a user relies on accessibility options to use the desktop, GNOME should be the pick.
#### Is KDE Faster than GNOME?
It is important to have a desktop environment that works efficiently with available system resources. This is incredibly significant if you want to multitask and do not have an extreme configuration to back it up.
KDE is generally considered faster than most other desktop environments because it is light on resources.
However, to give you a reference, I created two VMs (Fedora 35 and KDE Neon User Edition) to provide some idea before you proceed to try.
Both the VM setups shared a similar resource configuration with two cores allocated and 8 GB memory, and here’s what we have:
![Resource usage on GNOME 41 \(Fedora 35\)][23]
The resource usage is a screenshot with nothing running in the background, right after turning on the VM.
In contrast, KDE-powered distro KDE Neon proved to consume less than 1 GB of RAM without the spectacle, screenshot app running in the background.
![][24]
Even with the screenshot app running, it consumes fewer resources out of the box.
If that doesn’t convince you, there have been numerous reports in the past like [Jason’s][25] that have mentioned KDE as the lighter desktop environment over XFCE as well.
### Available Distributions: GNOME vs KDE
Most of the popular offerings feature GNOME as the default (or the only) desktop environment. Fedora, Ubuntu, and Pop!_OS are popular examples.
You should find numerous distributions with separate GNOME editions.
As for KDE, you can try exploring our list o[f KDE-based distros][26], or seek options like Kubuntu. You may not find KDE as the default choice for most mainstream distros, but you should find a KDE variant for almost everything.
### So, What Should You Pick to Define Your Desktop Experience?
The choice of desktop environment gives you the desktop experience you want.
If you want simplicity, performance, and numerous options/tools, KDE should be an evergreen choice.
If you want a modern/cleaner look and do not mind the different layout (or user experience) GNOME can be a fantastic addition.
While GNOME may not be able to give you the same amount of control, you can still do many things with it. Pop!_OS gives you an example of having GNOME as the desktop environment and adding extensions/functionality on top of it to make it a polished desktop distribution.
So, you would need to evaluate what’s more important to your user experience.
**My take**: I’d pick GNOME over KDE for a unique/polished desktop experience.
_What would you pick? Let me know your thoughts in the comments section below._
### Frequently Asked Questions: If You’re Still Confused to Make a Choice
You might have some questions after reading the comparison, so I’d like to address some of the potential ones:
**1\. Why is KDE not Popular?**
KDE is arguably the second-most popular desktop environment after GNOME. However, it isn’t the default choice for mainstream distros and popular options like Ubuntu, Pop!_OS, Fedora; hence, you get to see GNOME around you.
**2\. Is GNOME more stable than KDE?**
Both the desktop environments have been built by a skilled team of developers, with regular fixes and improvements.
GNOME has had multiple radical changes so far. So, in that way, KDE can be considered a more consistent and stable experience.
**3\. Is KDE Faster than GNOME?**
While we have already tried to address that in our article, it should be noted that the performance depends on what you do and the available system resources.
For some users, the least resource consumption can be a big win. And, for some, with more available resources, the differences fade away.
**4\. Is KDE Better than GNOME?**
KDE features more applications, customization options, and extra functionalities. However, it can be overwhelming for users who do not want access to any such options.
If a user prefers a clean user experience providing a modern look, GNOME can be a better pick.
Ultimately, it’s all about your preferences, not the advantages of a desktop environment.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://itsfoss.com/kde-vs-gnome/
作者：[Ankush Das][a]
选题：[lujun9972][b]
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]: https://itsfoss.com/author/ankush/
[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972
[1]: https://itsfoss.com/what-is-desktop-environment/
[2]: https://itsfoss.com/best-linux-desktop-environments/
[3]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-home-2022.png?resize=800%2C466&ssl=1
[4]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-system-tray-area.png?resize=715%2C570&ssl=1
[5]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-41-home.png?resize=800%2C409&ssl=1
[6]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-ui-elements.png?resize=582%2C373&ssl=1
[7]: https://apps.kde.org
[8]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-discover.png?resize=800%2C595&ssl=1
[9]: https://apps.gnome.org/en-GB/
[10]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-apps.png?resize=800%2C409&ssl=1
[11]: https://itsfoss.com/kde-customization/
[12]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-appearance-custom.png?resize=800%2C564&ssl=1
[13]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-settings-appearance-41.png?resize=800%2C573&ssl=1
[14]: https://news.itsfoss.com/gnome-42-features/
[15]: https://itsfoss.com/gnome-shell-extensions/
[16]: https://extensions.gnome.org
[17]: https://itsfoss.com/best-gnome-extensions/
[18]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-extensions-website.png?resize=800%2C520&ssl=1
[19]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-plasma-addons.png?resize=800%2C557&ssl=1
[20]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-app-addons.png?resize=800%2C557&ssl=1
[21]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-accesibility.png?resize=800%2C564&ssl=1
[22]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-accessibility.png?resize=800%2C487&ssl=1
[23]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-fedora-resource-usage.png?resize=752%2C552&ssl=1
[24]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-resource-usage.png?resize=800%2C599&ssl=1
[25]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2019/10/23/bold-prediction-kde-will-steal-the-lightweight-linux-desktop-crown-in-2020/?sh=1338b70026d2
[26]: https://itsfoss.com/best-kde-distributions/

258
translated/tech/20220224 KDE vs GNOME- What-s the Ultimate Linux Desktop Choice.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
[#]: subject: "KDE vs GNOME: What’s the Ultimate Linux Desktop Choice?"
[#]: via: "https://itsfoss.com/kde-vs-gnome/"
[#]: author: "Ankush Das https://itsfoss.com/author/ankush/"
[#]: collector: "lujun9972"
[#]: translator: "geekpi"
[#]: reviewer: " "
[#]: publisher: " "
[#]: url: " "
KDE 与 GNOME：什么是 Linux 桌面的终极选择？
======
说到Linux，桌面环境是个大问题。
桌面环境构成了图形用户界面（GUI），以及你在 Linux 发行版上得到的一组应用。
你可以通过我们的[解释什么是桌面环境的文章][1]了解。
选择一个好的桌面环境可以帮助你提高生产力、工作流程、易用性和整体体验。
而且，在[最佳桌面环境][2]中，KDE 和 GNOME 特别受欢迎。在这里，我打算强调关键的区别，以帮助你做出决定。
### 用户界面：功能与外观
用户界面通常涉及到布局类型、图标、主题、小工具和 GUI 的其他组件。
KDE 的目标是提供一个传统的桌面布局，让大多数 Windows 用户感到舒适。
![][3]
不过，不要被这一点所迷惑。它的外观很简单，但却专注于更多的功能。
事实上，Windows 从 KDE 中获得了灵感，对其用户界面进行了一些改进，比如通过滚动任务栏中的音量图标来调整音量的能力。
![][4]
而且，KDE 以其一致的外观和感觉而闻名，即使多年来有许多改进。
另一方面，GNOME 提供了一种独特的桌面体验。如果你正在寻找一个不同的和现代的用户界面设计，GNOME 应该很适合你。
关于现代标准，图标/主题/壁纸可能看起来更好。对偏好有取舍，但在我看来，GNOME 看起来更有吸引力。
![][5]
然而，如果你已经适应了传统的类似 Windows 的布局，调整工作流程可能需要一段时间。
这里没有开始/应用/菜单按钮。你必须点击活动概览来访问你的工作空间（或虚拟桌面），并从同一个地方访问应用菜单。
对一些人来说，没有任务栏可能看起来更干净，但这取决于你的喜好。
请注意，与 KDE 相比，UI 可能没有那么多功能和丰富。例如，系统托盘中的部件提供了比 GNOME 上的小程序更多的选项。
![GNOME 41][6]
因此，在 UI 方面，KDE与GNOME并没有明显的赢家，而是取决于你对功能或现代外观的要求。
### 应用生态
使用KDE，你可以获得[无数的实用程序][7]。
你可能会被 KDE 提供给 KDE 的应用所淹没。
![][8]
除此以外，整个 KDE 社区都一直忙于为这个武器库添加新的应用和工具。
它们中许多在现有的应用中脱颖而出，如 Krita、Kdenlive、Kate Editor 等等。
GNOME 默认也具有[众多的应用][9]。虽然对于大多数用户来说，这可能是一个足够的列表，但与 KDE 相比，它在目录上有所不足。
![][10]
我发现自己并没有使用 GNOME 的很多应用。
而且，值得注意的是，与 GNOME 的默认应用相比，桌面环境自带的 KDE 应用得到了更快的改进。
与 GNOME 应用程序相比，考虑到 KDE 的开发更新，这只是个人观察。 但是，这可能会随着时间而改变。
### 什么是最好的定制？
如果你想修补和控制用户体验，KDE 是一个很好的选择。
不要相信我的话。你可以按照我们的 [KDE 定制指南][11]了解可用选项。
![][12]
不仅仅是定制的能力，你还可以得到很多开箱即用的控制，用于改变主题、颜色、工作区效果、窗口管理等等，而不需要任何特定的应用程序/扩展。
对于一些人来说，如果你想坚持使用原版的体验，无论如何，选项的可用性可能不会产生什么影响。
至于 GNOME，你并没有得到很多开箱即用的控制。相反，你将不得不依靠 GNOME Tweaks 或扩展来做一些改变。但是，是的，你可以在很大程度上自定义体验。
![][13]
另外，请注意，在写这篇文章的时候，[GNOME 42][14] 还没有作为一个稳定版本。所以，你可以期待一个系统级的深色模式的实现，以及一些外观/感觉上的改进。
当然，这不是一个公平的比较，考虑到两者都提供不同的 GUI 元素和布局。然而，对于想要更多控制和定制选项的用户来说，KDE 会被选择。
GNOME 适合于不想要很多选项的用户。如果你喜欢 GNOME 提供的东西，并且愿意用额外的努力来定制体验，你也可以这么做。
#### 额外的能力：KDE 与 GNOME
如前所述，GNOME 提供了[扩展功能以增加更多的功能][15]到你当前的配置。
你可以前往 [GNOME 的 shell 扩展网站][16]来探索各种选择，或者看看我们的[最佳 gnome 扩展列表][17]。
![][18]
GNOME 扩展让你可以轻松地做很多事情，比如使用自动移动窗口切换器自动启动应用的工作区。
有各种各样的扩展来改善你的工作流程，使事情变得简单。
然而，这些扩展取决于 GNOME shell 的版本。此外，由于从一个版本到另一个版本的激进变化，GNOME 扩展可能在未来的版本中停止工作。
另一方面，KDE 也提供了一个充满附加组件、小工具和应用附加组件的袋子。
![][19]
不像 GNOME 从浏览器中添加扩展的不方便的方式（使用另一个浏览器扩展），你可以使用发现软件中心直接访问 KDE 的附加组件。
![][20]
所以，添加额外的功能或主题就变成了一种无缝的体验，而不需要遵循一套单独的步骤。
不要忘了，像 KDE Connect 这样的工具提供了额外的能力，让你把你的手机和你的电脑连接起来。
总的来说，你可以在两者上扩展功能，但如果你想有更多的选择，KDE 更有优势。
#### 无障碍选项
虽然 KDE 在几个方面做得很好，但增强桌面无障碍的可用能力非常有限（比如没有开箱即用的屏幕阅读器）。
![][21]
有一种可能是，开发者正在用 Orca Screen Reader 应用测试读屏器的功能，即桌面的听力/视觉辅助工具，但在 KDE Plasma 5.24中，它不够实用。
正如我们的一位读者所指出的，KDE 在安装前后都不能说话。所以，这对他们来说不是一个选择。
然而，GNOME 做得更好，它有读屏器、视觉提醒、屏幕键盘、声音键、点击辅助等。
![][22]
所以，如果一个用户依赖无障碍选项来使用桌面，GNOME 应该是个选择。
#### KDE 比 GNOME 更快？
拥有一个能在可用系统资源下有效工作的桌面环境是很重要的。如果你想进行多任务处理，而又没有极端的配置来支持的话，这一点就显得无比重要。
KDE 通常被认为比其他大多数桌面环境要快，因为它对资源的占用很轻。
然而，为了给你一个参考，我创建了两个虚拟机（Fedora 35 和 KDE Neon 用户版），在你继续尝试之前提供一些想法。
两个虚拟机的设置都共享一个类似的资源配置，分配了两个核心和8GB内存，下面是我们的情况：
![Resource usage on GNOME 41 \(Fedora 35\)][23]
这个资源使用情况是在开启虚拟机后，后台没有任何东西运行的情况下的截图。
相比之下，由 KDE 驱动的发行版 KDE Neon 被证明在后台没有运行截图程序的情况下消耗了不到 1GB 的内存。
![][24]
即使在截图程序运行的情况下，它消耗的资源也较少。
如果这还不能说服你，过去也有许多报告，比如 [Jason的报告][25]，提到 KDE 是比 XFCE 更轻的桌面环境。
### 可用的发行版：GNOME 与 KDE
大多数流行的发行版都将 GNOME 作为默认（或唯一）的桌面环境。Fedora、Ubuntu 和 Pop!\_OS 是流行的例子。
你应该能找到许多带有独立的 GNOME 版本的发行版。
至于 KDE，你可以尝试探索我们的[基于 KDE 的发行版][26]列表，或者寻找像 Kubuntu 这样的选择。你可能不会发现 KDE 是大多数主流发行版的默认选择，但你应该发现几乎所有的东西都有 KDE 的变体。
### 那么，你应该选择什么来定义你的桌面体验？
对桌面环境的选择给了你想要的桌面体验。
如果你想要简单、性能和众多的选项/工具，KDE 应该是一个常青的选择。
如果你想要一个现代的/更干净的外观，并且不介意不同的布局（或用户体验），GNOME 可以成为一个不错的补充。
虽然 GNOME 可能无法给你同样多的控制，但你仍然可以用它做很多事情。Pop!\_OS 给了你一个将 GNOME 作为桌面环境的例子，并在其上添加扩展/功能，使其成为一个光鲜的桌面发行版。
所以，你需要评估什么对你的用户体验更重要。
**我的看法**：我会选择 GNOME 而不是 KDE，以获得独特/完美的桌面体验。
_你会选择什么？请在下面的评论区告诉我你的想法。_
### 常见问题：如果你还在为做出选择而感到困惑
看完比较后，你可能会有一些问题，所以我想解决一些潜在的问题：
**1\. 为什么 KDE 不流行**
KDE 可以说是继 GNOME 之后第二受欢迎的桌面环境。然而，它并不是主流发行版和 Ubuntu、Pop!\_OS、Fedora 等流行选项的默认选择；因此，你可以看到身边都是 GNOME。
**2\. GNOME 比 KDE 更稳定吗？**
这两个桌面环境都是由一个有经验的开发者团队建立的，并定期进行修复和改进。
到目前为止，GNOME 已经有多次彻底的改变。所以，从这个角度来说，KDE 可以被认为是一个更一致和稳定的体验。
**3\. KDE 是否比 GNOME 更快？**
虽然我们已经在文章中试图解决这个问题，但应该注意的是，性能取决于你做什么和可用的系统资源。
对于一些用户来说，最少的资源消耗可能是一个很大的胜利。而对某些人来说，随着可用资源的增加，差异也会逐渐消失。
**4\. KDE 比 GNOME 好吗？**
KDE 具有更多的应用、自定义选项和额外的功能。然而，对于那些不希望获得任何此类选项的用户来说，它可能会让人感到不知所措。
如果用户喜欢简洁的用户体验，提供现代的外观，GNOME 可能是一个更好的选择。
归根结底，这都是你的喜好，而不是一个桌面环境的优势。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://itsfoss.com/kde-vs-gnome/
作者：[Ankush Das][a]
选题：[lujun9972][b]
译者：[geekpi](https://github.com/geekpi)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]: https://itsfoss.com/author/ankush/
[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972
[1]: https://itsfoss.com/what-is-desktop-environment/
[2]: https://itsfoss.com/best-linux-desktop-environments/
[3]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-home-2022.png?resize=800%2C466&ssl=1
[4]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-system-tray-area.png?resize=715%2C570&ssl=1
[5]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-41-home.png?resize=800%2C409&ssl=1
[6]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-ui-elements.png?resize=582%2C373&ssl=1
[7]: https://apps.kde.org
[8]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-discover.png?resize=800%2C595&ssl=1
[9]: https://apps.gnome.org/en-GB/
[10]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-apps.png?resize=800%2C409&ssl=1
[11]: https://itsfoss.com/kde-customization/
[12]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-appearance-custom.png?resize=800%2C564&ssl=1
[13]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-settings-appearance-41.png?resize=800%2C573&ssl=1
[14]: https://news.itsfoss.com/gnome-42-features/
[15]: https://itsfoss.com/gnome-shell-extensions/
[16]: https://extensions.gnome.org
[17]: https://itsfoss.com/best-gnome-extensions/
[18]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-extensions-website.png?resize=800%2C520&ssl=1
[19]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-plasma-addons.png?resize=800%2C557&ssl=1
[20]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-app-addons.png?resize=800%2C557&ssl=1
[21]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-accesibility.png?resize=800%2C564&ssl=1
[22]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-accessibility.png?resize=800%2C487&ssl=1
[23]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/gnome-fedora-resource-usage.png?resize=752%2C552&ssl=1
[24]: https://i0.wp.com/itsfoss.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/kde-resource-usage.png?resize=800%2C599&ssl=1
[25]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2019/10/23/bold-prediction-kde-will-steal-the-lightweight-linux-desktop-crown-in-2020/?sh=1338b70026d2
[26]: https://itsfoss.com/best-kde-distributions/