mirror of
https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git
synced 2025-01-28 23:20:10 +08:00
translated
This commit is contained in:
parent
ff3b9de14e
commit
981f7e86db
@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
|
||||
translating by wwy-hust
|
||||
|
||||
What is good audio editing software on Linux
|
||||
================================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
Whether you are an amateur musician or just a student recording his professor, you need to edit and work with audio recordings. If for a long time such task was exclusively attributed to Macintosh, this time is over, and Linux now has what it takes to do the job. In short, here is a non-exhaustive list of good audio editing software, fit for different tasks and needs.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Audacity ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8572/15405018653_83ba3e718d_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
Let's get started head on with my personal favorite. [Audacity][1] works on Windows, Mac, and Linux. It is open source. It is easy to use. You get it: Audacity is almost perfect. This program lets you manipulate the audio waveform from a clean interface. In short, you can overlay tracks, cut and edit them easily, apply effects, perform advanced sound analysis, and finally export to a plethora of format. The reason I like it so much is that it combines both basic features with more complicated ones, but maintain an easy leaning curve. However, it is not a fully optimized software for hardcore musicians, or people with professional knowledge.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Jokosher ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7524/15998875136_82903a9b4a_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
On a different level, [Jokosher][2] focuses more on the multi-track aspect for musical artists. Developed in Python and using the GTK+ interface with GStreamer for audio back-end, Jokosher really impressed me with its slick interface and its extensions. If the editing features are not the most advanced, the language is clear and directed to musicians. And I really like the association between tracks and instruments for example. In short, if you are starting as a musician, it might be a good place to get some experience before moving on to more complex suites.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Ardour ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8577/16024644385_d8cd8073a3_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
And talking about compex suites, [Ardour][3] is complete software for recording, editing, and mixing. Designed this time to appeal to all professionals, Ardour features in term of sound routing and plugins go way beyond my comprehension. So if you are looking for a beast and are not afraid to tame it, Ardour is probably a good pick. Again, the interface contributes to its charm, as well as its extensive documentation. I particularly appreciated the first-launch configuration tool.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Kwave ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7557/15402389884_633a8b04c5_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
For all KDE lovers, [KWave][4] corresponds to your idea of design and features. There are plenty of shortcuts and interesting options, like memory management. Even if the few effects are nice, we are more dealing with a simple tool to cut/paste audio together. It becomes shard not to compare it with Audacity unfortunately. And on top of that, the interface did not appeal to me that much.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Qtractor ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7551/16022707501_68c39f37e5_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
If Kwave is too simplistic for you but a Qt-based program really has some appeal, then [Qtractor][5] might be your option. It aims to be "simple enough for the average home user, and yet powerful enough for the professional user." Indeed the quantity of features and options is almost overwhelming. My favorite being of course customizable shortcuts. Apart from that, Qtractor is probably one of my favorite tools to deal with MIDI files.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. LMMS ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7509/15838603239_ef0ecbc8d2_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
Standing for Linux MultiMedia Studio, LMMS is directly targeted for music production. If you do not have prior experience and do not want to spend too much time getting some, go elsewhere. LMMS is one of those complex but powerful software that only a few will truly master. The number of features and effects is simply too long to list, but if I had to pick one, I would say that the Freeboy plugin to emulate Game Boy sound system is just magical. Past that, go see their amazing documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Traverso ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7537/15838603279_70ee925057_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, Traverso stood out to me for its unlimited track count and its direct integration with CD burning capacities. Aside from that, it appeared to me as a middle man between a simplistic software and a professional program. The interface is very KDE-like, and the keyboard configuration is always welcome. And cherry on the cake, Traverso monitors your resources and make sure that your CPU or hard drive does not go overboard.
|
||||
|
||||
To conclude, it is always a pleasure to see such a large diversity of applications on Linux. It makes finding the software that best fits your needs always possible. While my personal favorite stays Audacity, I was very surprised by the design of programs like LMMS or Jokosher.
|
||||
|
||||
Did we miss one? What do you use for audio editing on Linux? And why? Let us know in the comments.
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
via: http://xmodulo.com/good-audio-editing-software-linux.html
|
||||
|
||||
作者:[Adrien Brochard][a]
|
||||
译者:[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
|
||||
校对:[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||
|
||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译,[Linux中国](http://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||
|
||||
[a]:http://xmodulo.com/author/adrien
|
||||
[1]:http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
|
||||
[2]:https://launchpad.net/jokosher/
|
||||
[3]:http://ardour.org/
|
||||
[4]:http://kwave.sourceforge.net/
|
||||
[5]:http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html
|
||||
[6]:
|
||||
[7]:
|
||||
[8]:
|
||||
[9]:
|
||||
[10]:
|
||||
[11]:
|
||||
[12]:
|
||||
[13]:
|
||||
[14]:
|
||||
[15]:
|
||||
[16]:
|
||||
[17]:
|
||||
[18]:
|
||||
[19]:
|
||||
[20]:
|
@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
Linux下优秀的音频编辑软件
|
||||
================================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
不论您是一个音乐爱好者或只是一个要记录您导师声音的学生,您都需要录制音频和编辑音频。长久以来这样的工作都要靠Macintosh,如今那个时代已经过去,现在Linux也可以胜任这些工作了。简而言之,这里有一份不完全的音频编辑器软件列表,适用于不同的任务和需求。
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Audacity ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8572/15405018653_83ba3e718d_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
让我们从我个人最喜欢的软件开始。[Audacity][1]可以运行在Windows、Mac和Linux上。它是开源的,且易于使用。你会觉得:Audacity几乎是完美的。它可以让您在干净的界面上操作音频波形。简单地说,您可以覆盖音轨、剪切和修改音轨、增加特效、执行高级的声音分析,然后将它们导出到一大堆可用的格式。我喜欢它的原因是它将基本的功能和复杂的功能结合在一起并且保持一个简单的学习曲线。然而,它并不是一个完全最优化的软件,尤其是对于音乐家和有着专业知识的人。
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Jokosher ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7524/15998875136_82903a9b4a_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
在不同的层次上,[Jokosher][2]更多的聚焦在多音轨方面。它使用Python和GTK+作为前端借口,并使用GStreamer作为音频后端。Jokosher那平滑的界面和它的扩展性给我留下了深刻的印象。也许编辑的功能并不是最先进的,但它的语言十分清晰,适合音乐家。例如,我十分喜欢音轨和乐器的组合。简而言之,如果您是一个音乐家,那么它是在您转移到下一个软件前进行实践的好机会。
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Ardour ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8577/16024644385_d8cd8073a3_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
接下来谈论一些复杂的工具,[Ardour][3]是一套完整的可以录制、编辑和混音的软件。这个设计吸引所有的专业人员,Ardour在声音和插件方面超出我的想象。如果您在寻找一头野兽并且不惧怕驯服他,那么Ardour获取是一个不错的选择。再次,它的接口和它丰富的文档,尤其是它首次启动时的配置工具都是他迷人魅力的一部分。
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Kwave ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7557/15402389884_633a8b04c5_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
对于所有KDE的热爱者,[KWave][4]绝对符合您对于设计和功能的想象。它有丰富的快捷键以及很多有趣的选项,例如内存管理。尽管很多特效很不错,但我们更应该关注那些用于音频剪切/粘贴的工具。可惜的是它无法与Audacity相比,而更重要的是,该接口并没有那么吸引我。
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Qtractor ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7551/16022707501_68c39f37e5_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
如果Kwave对您来说过于简单,但基于Qt的程序却有些吸引力,那么对您来说,也许[Qtractor][5]是一个选项。它致力于做一个“对于家庭用户来说足够简单,并且对专业人员来说足够强大的软件。”实际上它功能和选项的数量几乎是压倒性的。我最喜欢的当然是可定制的快捷键。除此之外,Qtractor可能是我最喜欢的一个处理MIDI文件的工具。
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. LMMS ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7509/15838603239_ef0ecbc8d2_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
作为Linux多媒体工作室,LMMS的直接目标是音乐制作。如果您之前没有什么经验并且不想浪费太多的时间,那么请去别处吧。LMMS是其中一个复杂但强大的软件,只有少数的人真正的掌握了它。它有太多的功能和特效以至于无法一一列出,但如果我必须找一个,我会说用来模拟Game Boy声音系统的Freeboy插件简直像魔术一样。然后,去看看它那惊人的文档吧。
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Traverso ###
|
||||
|
||||
![](https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7537/15838603279_70ee925057_c.jpg)
|
||||
|
||||
最后站在我面前的是Traverso,它支持无限制的音轨计数,并直接整合了CD烧录的功能。另外,它对我来说是介于简单的软件和专业的软件之间的程序。它的界面是KDE样式的,其键盘配置很简单。更有趣的是,Traverso会监视您的系统资源以确定不会超过您的CPU或者硬件的能力。
|
||||
|
||||
总而言之,能在Linux系统上看到这么多不同的应用程序是一件开心的事。它使得您永远可以找到最适合自己的那一款。虽然我最喜欢的应用是Audacity,但我非常震惊于LMMS和Jokosher的设计。
|
||||
|
||||
我们有漏掉什么么?您在Linux下使用哪一款软件呢?原因是什么呢?请在留言处留言让我们知道。
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
via: http://xmodulo.com/good-audio-editing-software-linux.html
|
||||
|
||||
作者:[Adrien Brochard][a]
|
||||
译者:[wwy-hust](https://github.com/wwy-hust)
|
||||
校对:[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||
|
||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译,[Linux中国](http://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||
|
||||
[a]:http://xmodulo.com/author/adrien
|
||||
[1]:http://audacity.sourceforge.net/
|
||||
[2]:https://launchpad.net/jokosher/
|
||||
[3]:http://ardour.org/
|
||||
[4]:http://kwave.sourceforge.net/
|
||||
[5]:http://qtractor.sourceforge.net/qtractor-index.html
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user