mirror of
https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git
synced 2024-12-26 21:30:55 +08:00
Merge pull request #17120 from wxy/20191015-How-GNOME-uses-Git
TSL:20191015 How GNOME uses Git
This commit is contained in:
Xingyu.Wang
GitHub
commit
87df6569f6
@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
|
||||
[#]: collector: (lujun9972)
|
||||
[#]: translator: (wxy)
|
||||
[#]: reviewer: ( )
|
||||
[#]: publisher: ( )
|
||||
[#]: url: ( )
|
||||
[#]: subject: (How GNOME uses Git)
|
||||
[#]: via: (https://opensource.com/article/19/10/how-gnome-uses-git)
|
||||
[#]: author: (Molly de Blanc https://opensource.com/users/mollydb)
|
||||
|
||||
How GNOME uses Git
|
||||
======
|
||||
The GNOME project's decision to centralize on GitLab is creating
|
||||
benefits across the community—even beyond the developers.
|
||||
![red panda][1]
|
||||
|
||||
“What’s your GitLab?” is one of the first questions I was asked on my first day working for the [GNOME Foundation][2]—the nonprofit that supports GNOME projects, including the [desktop environment][3], [GTK][4], and [GStreamer][5]. The person was referring to my username on [GNOME’s GitLab instance][6]. In my time with GNOME, I’ve been asked for my GitLab a lot.
|
||||
|
||||
We use GitLab for basically everything. In a typical day, I get several issues and reference bug reports, and I occasionally need to modify a file. I don’t do this in the capacity of being a developer or a sysadmin. I’m involved with the Engagement and Inclusion & Diversity (I&D) teams. I write newsletters for Friends of GNOME and interview contributors to the project. I work on sponsorships for GNOME events. I don’t write code, and I use GitLab every day.
|
||||
|
||||
The GNOME project has been managed a lot of ways over the past two decades. Different parts of the project used different systems to track changes to code, collaborate, and share information both as a project and as a social space. However, the project made the decision that it needed to become more integrated and it took about a year from conception to completion.
|
||||
|
||||
There were a number of reasons GNOME wanted to switch to a single tool for use across the community. External projects touch GNOME, and providing them an easier way to interact with resources was important for the project, both to support the community and to grow the ecosystem. We also wanted to better track metrics for GNOME—the number of contributors, the type and number of contributions, and the developmental progress of different parts of the project.
|
||||
|
||||
When it came time to pick a collaboration tool, we considered what we needed. One of the most important requirements was that it must be hosted by the GNOME community; being hosted by a third party didn’t feel like an option, so that discounted services like GitHub and Atlassian. And, of course, it had to be free software. It quickly became obvious that the only real contender was GitLab. We wanted to make sure contribution would be easy. GitLab has features like single sign-on, which allows people to use GitHub, Google, GitLab.com, and GNOME accounts.
|
||||
|
||||
We agreed that GitLab was the way to go, and we began to migrate from many tools to a single tool. GNOME board member [Carlos Soriano][7] led the charge. With lots of support from GitLab and the GNOME community, we completed the process in May 2018.
|
||||
|
||||
There was a lot of hope that moving to GitLab would help grow the community and make contributing easier. Because GNOME previously used so many different tools, including Bugzilla and CGit, it’s hard to quantitatively measure how the switch has impacted the number of contributions. We can more clearly track some statistics though, such as the nearly 10,000 issues closed and 7,085 merge requests merged between June and November 2018. People feel that the community has grown and become more welcoming and that contribution is, in fact, easier.
|
||||
|
||||
People come to free software from all sorts of different starting points, and it’s important to try to even out the playing field by providing better resources and extra support for people who need them. Git, as a tool, is widely used, and more people are coming to participate in free software with those skills ready to go. Self-hosting GitLab provides the perfect opportunity to combine the familiarity of Git with the feature-rich, user-friendly environment provided by GitLab.
|
||||
|
||||
It’s been a little over a year, and the change is really noticeable. Continuous integration (CI) has been a huge benefit for development, and it has been completely integrated into nearly every part of GNOME. Teams that aren’t doing code development have also switched to using the GitLab ecosystem for their work. Whether it’s using issue tracking to manage assigned tasks or version control to share and manage assets, even teams like Engagement and I&D have taken up using GitLab.
|
||||
|
||||
It can be hard for a community, even one developing free software, to adapt to a new technology or tool. It is especially hard in a case like GNOME, a project that [recently turned 22][8]. After more than two decades of building a project like GNOME, with so many parts used by so many people and organizations, the migration was an endeavor that was only possible thanks to the hard work of the GNOME community and generous assistance from GitLab.
|
||||
|
||||
I find a lot of convenience in working for a project that uses Git for version control. It’s a system that feels comfortable and is familiar—it’s a tool that is consistent across workplaces and hobby projects. As a new member of the GNOME community, it was great to be able to jump in and just use GitLab. As a community builder, it’s inspiring to see the results: more associated projects coming on board and entering the ecosystem; new contributors and community members making their first contributions to the project; and increased ability to measure the work we’re doing to know it’s effective and successful.
|
||||
|
||||
It’s great that so many teams doing completely different things (such as what they’re working on and what skills they’re using) agree to centralize on any tool—especially one that is considered a standard across open source. As a contributor to GNOME, I really appreciate that we’re using GitLab.
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
via: https://opensource.com/article/19/10/how-gnome-uses-git
|
||||
|
||||
作者：[Molly de Blanc][a]
|
||||
选题：[lujun9972][b]
|
||||
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
|
||||
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||
|
||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||
|
||||
[a]: https://opensource.com/users/mollydb
|
||||
[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972
|
||||
[1]: https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/styles/image-full-size/public/lead-images/redpanda_firefox_pet_animal.jpg?itok=aSpKsyna (red panda)
|
||||
[2]: https://www.gnome.org/foundation/
|
||||
[3]: https://gnome.org/
|
||||
[4]: https://www.gtk.org/
|
||||
[5]: https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/
|
||||
[6]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/
|
||||
[7]: https://twitter.com/csoriano1618?lang=en
|
||||
[8]: https://opensource.com/article/19/8/poll-favorite-gnome-version
|
||||
61
translated/talk/20191015 How GNOME uses Git.md
Normal file
61
translated/talk/20191015 How GNOME uses Git.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
||||
[#]: collector: (lujun9972)
|
||||
[#]: translator: (wxy)
|
||||
[#]: reviewer: ( )
|
||||
[#]: publisher: ( )
|
||||
[#]: url: ( )
|
||||
[#]: subject: (How GNOME uses Git)
|
||||
[#]: via: (https://opensource.com/article/19/10/how-gnome-uses-git)
|
||||
[#]: author: (Molly de Blanc https://opensource.com/users/mollydb)
|
||||
|
||||
GNOME 项目是如何使用 Git 的？
|
||||
======
|
||||
|
||||
将 GNOME 项目集中在 GitLab 上的决定为整个社区（不只是开发人员）带来了好处。
|
||||
|
||||
![red panda][1]
|
||||
|
||||
“您的 GitLab 是什么？”这是我在 [GNOME 基金会][2]工作的第一天被问到的第一个问题之一，该基金会是支持 GNOME 项目的非盈利组织，包括[桌面环境][3]、[GTK][4] 和 [GStreamer][5]。此人指的是我在 [GNOME 的 GitLab 实例][6上的用户名。我在 GNOME 期间，经常有人要求我提供我的 GitLab。
|
||||
|
||||
我们使用 GitLab 进行几乎所有操作。通常情况下，我会收到一些提案和参考错误报告，有时还需要修改文件。我不是以开发人员或系统管理员的身份进行此操作的。我参与了“参与度、包容性和多样性（I＆D）”团队。我为 GNOME 朋友们撰写新闻通讯，并采访该项目的贡献者。我为 GNOME 活动提供赞助。我不写代码，但我每天都使用 GitLab。
|
||||
|
||||
在过去的二十年中，GNOME 项目的管理采用了各种方式。该项目的不同部分使用不同的系统来跟踪代码更改、协作以及作为项目和社交空间共享信息。但是，该项目决定，它需要更加一体化，这从构思到完成大约花费了一年的时间。
|
||||
|
||||
GNOME 希望切换到单个工具供整个社区使用的原因很多。外部项目与 GNOME 息息相关，并为它们提供与资源交互的更简单的方式对于项目至关重要，无论是支持社区还是发展生态系统。我们还希望更好地跟踪 GNOME 的指标，即贡献者的数量、贡献的类型和数量以及项目不同部分的开发进度。
|
||||
|
||||
当需要选择一种协作工具时，我们考虑了我们需要的东西。最重要的要求之一是它必须由 GNOME 社区托管。由第三方托管并不是一种选择，因此像 GitHub 和 Atlassian 这样的服务就不在考虑之中。而且，当然了，它必须是自由软件。很快，唯一真正的竞争者就是 GitLab。我们希望确保进行贡献很容易。GitLab 具有诸如单点登录的功能，该功能允许人们使用 GitHub、Google、GitLab.com 和 GNOME 帐户登录。
|
||||
|
||||
我们认为 GitLab 是一条出路，我们开始从许多工具迁移到单个工具。GNOME 董事会成员 [Carlos Soriano][7] 领导这项改变。在 GitLab 和 GNOME 社区的大力支持下，我们于 2018 年 5 月完成了该过程。
|
||||
|
||||
人们非常希望迁移到 GitLab 有助于社区的发展，并使贡献更容易。由于 GNOME 以前使用了许多不同的工具，包括 Bugzilla 和 CGit，因此很难定量地评估这次切换对贡献量的影响。但是，我们可以更清楚地跟踪一些统计数据，例如在 2018 年 6 月至 2018 年 11 月之间关闭了近 10,000 个提案，合并了 7,085 个合并请求。人们感到社区在发展壮大，越来越受欢迎，而且贡献实际上也更容易。
|
||||
|
||||
人们因不同的原因而开始使用自由软件，重要的是，可以通过为需要软件的人提供更好的资源和更多的支持来公平竞争。Git 作为一种工具已被广泛使用，并且越来越多的人使用这些技能来参与到自由软件当中。自托管的 GitLab 提供了将 Git 的熟悉度与 GitLab 提供的功能丰富、用户友好的环境相结合的绝佳机会。
|
||||
|
||||
已经一年多了，变化确实很明显。持续集成（CI）为开发带来了巨大的好处，并且已经完全集成到 GNOME 的几乎每个部分当中。不进行代码开发的团队也转而使用 GitLab 生态系统进行工作。无论是使用问题跟踪来管理分配的任务，还是使用版本控制来共享和管理资产，就连“参与度、包容性和多样性（I＆D）”这样的团队都已经使用了 GitLab。
|
||||
|
||||
一个社区，即使是一个正在开发的自由软件，也很难适应新技术或新工具。在类似 GNOME 的情况下，这尤其困难，该项目[最近已经 22 岁了] [8]。像 GNOME 这样经过了 20 多年建设的项目，太多的人和组织使用了太多的部件，但迁移工作之所以能实现，这要归功于 GNOME 社区的辛勤工作和 GitLab 的慷慨帮助。
|
||||
|
||||
在为使用 Git 进行版本控制的项目工作时，我发现很方便。这是一个令人感觉舒适和熟悉的系统，是一个在工作场所和爱好项目之间保持一致的工具。作为 GNOME 社区的新成员，能够参与并使用 GitLab 真是太好了。作为社区建设者，看到这样结果是令人鼓舞的：越来越多的相关项目加入并进入生态系统；新的贡献者和社区成员对该项目做出了首次贡献；以及增强了衡量我们正在做的工作以了解其成功和成功的能力。
|
||||
|
||||
如此多的做着完全不同的事情（例如他们正在从事的不同工作以及所使用的不同技能）的团队同意集中在一个工具上（尤其是被认为是跨开源的标准工具），这一点很棒。 作为 GNOME 的贡献者，我真的非常感谢我们使用了 GitLab。
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
via: https://opensource.com/article/19/10/how-gnome-uses-git
|
||||
|
||||
作者：[Molly de Blanc][a]
|
||||
选题：[lujun9972][b]
|
||||
译者：[wxy](https://github.com/wxy)
|
||||
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
|
||||
|
||||
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
|
||||
|
||||
[a]: https://opensource.com/users/mollydb
|
||||
[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972
|
||||
[1]: https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/styles/image-full-size/public/lead-images/redpanda_firefox_pet_animal.jpg?itok=aSpKsyna (red panda)
|
||||
[2]: https://www.gnome.org/foundation/
|
||||
[3]: https://gnome.org/
|
||||
[4]: https://www.gtk.org/
|
||||
[5]: https://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/
|
||||
[6]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/
|
||||
[7]: https://twitter.com/csoriano1618?lang=en
|
||||
[8]: https://opensource.com/article/19/8/poll-favorite-gnome-version
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user