diff --git a/published/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md b/published/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e614ba45e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/published/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +[#]: subject: "Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change" +[#]: via: "https://news.itsfoss.com/open-source-definition-ai/" +[#]: author: "Sourav Rudra https://news.itsfoss.com/author/sourav/" +[#]: collector: "lujun9972/lctt-scripts-1693450080" +[#]: translator: "ChatGPT" +[#]: reviewer: "wxy" +[#]: publisher: "wxy" +[#]: url: "https://linux.cn/article-16344-1.html" + +AI 模型的开源定义需要改变 +====== + +![][0] + +> 你认为开源许可证应当进行演变吗？ + +2023 年，我们以**人工智能（AI）崭露头角**开始了新的一年，同时也见证了众多公司全力以赴投身于 AI。 + +比如说 **Mozilla**，它在 2023 年初制定了 [开源 AI 计划][1]，以开发各种 AI 驱动的解决方案。而 **HuggingChat** 也成为了第一个推出 ChatGPT [开源替代品][2] 的组织。 + +即便是 Meta，他们也不例外。他们自家的 大型语言模型Large Language Model（LLM）[Llama 2][3] 项目在这一年都颇受关注，几个月前他们甚至推出了一款新的 [ChatGPT 竞争对手][4]。 + +然而，也有很多人开始 [提出质疑][5]，主张 **Meta 的 Llama 2 模型并不像人们期望的那样开放**，查看它的开源许可证似乎更是印证了这个观点。 + +该许可证 **不允许拥有超过 7 亿日活跃用户的服务使用 Llama 2**，同样的，**它也不能被用于训练其他的语言模型**。 + +这也就意味着 Meta 对于 Llama 2 的许可证 **未能满足** 开源倡议组织Open Source Initiative（OSI）的 [开源定义][6]Open Source Definition（OSD）所列出的 **全部要求**。 + +人们可以争辩，像 [EleutherAI][7] 和 [Falcon 40B][8] 这样的机构就做出了很好的示范，展示了如何适当地处理 AI 的开源许可。 + +然而，Meta 对此的看法却截然不同。 + +### 开源许可需要进化 + +在与 [The Verge][10] 的交谈中，Meta 人工智能研究副总裁 [Joëlle Pineau][11] 为他们的立场进行了辩解。 + +她说，我们 **需要在信息共享的益处和可能对 Meta 商业造成的潜在成本之间寻找平衡**。 + +这种对开源的态度让他们的研究人员能够更加专注地处理 AI 项目。她还补充说： + +> 开放的方式从内部改变了我们的科研方法，它促使我们不发布任何不安全的东西，并在一开始就负起责任。 + +Joëlle 希望他们的生成型 AI 模型能够和他们过去的 [PyTorch][12] 项目一样受到热捧。 + +但是，**问题在于现有的许可证机制**。她又补充说，这些许可证并不是设计来处理那些需要利用大量多源数据的软件。 + +这反过来**为开发者和用户提供了有限责任**，以及，**对版权侵犯的有限赔偿**（解释为：保护）。 + +此外，她还指出： + +> AI 模型与软件不同，涉及的风险更大，因此我认为我们应该对当前用户许可证进行改变，以更好地适应 AI 模型。 +> +> 但我并不是一名律师，所以我在此问题上听从他们的意见。 + +我赞同她的观点，我们需要更新现有的许可方案，使之更好地适应 AI 模型，以及其他相关事务。 + +显而易见，**OSI 正在努力进行此事**。OSI 的执行董事 [Stefano Maffulli][13] 向 The Verge 透露，他们了解到 **当前的 OSI 批准的许可证无法满足人工智能模型的需求**。 + +他们正在商讨如何与 AI 开发者合作，以提供一个 “**透明、无许可但安全**” 的模型访问。 + +他还补充说： + +> 我们肯定需要重新思考许可证的方式，以解决 AI 模型中版权和授权的真正限制，同时仍遵循开源社区的一些原则。 + +无论未来如何，显然，**开源标准必须推动其演化，以适应新的以及即将出现的技术** ，而此类问题不仅仅局限于 AI。 + +对于未来几年开源许可的变革，我充满期待。 + +💬 对于你来说呢？你认为对于陈旧的开源标准，我们需要进行什么样的改变？ + +*（题图：MJ/e8bae5f6-606b-47db-aaea-c992c0bd143e）* + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +via: https://news.itsfoss.com/open-source-definition-ai/ + +作者：[Sourav Rudra][a] +选题：[lujun9972][b] +译者：[ChatGPT](https://linux.cn/lctt/ChatGPT) +校对：[wxy](https://github.com/wxy) + +本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 + +[a]: https://news.itsfoss.com/author/sourav/ +[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972 +[1]: https://news.itsfoss.com/mozilla-open-source-ai/ +[2]: https://news.itsfoss.com/huggingchat-chatgpt/ +[3]: https://ai.meta.com/llama/ +[4]: https://news.itsfoss.com/meta-open-source-chatgpt/ +[5]: https://www.wired.com/story/the-myth-of-open-source-ai/ +[6]: https://opensource.org/osd/ +[7]: https://www.eleuther.ai/ +[8]: https://www.tii.ae/news/uaes-technology-innovation-institute-launches-open-source-falcon-40b-large-language-model +[9]: https://news.itsfoss.com/content/images/2023/04/Follow-us-on-Google-News.png +[10]: https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/30/23935587/meta-generative-ai-models-open-source +[11]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo%C3%ABlle_Pineau +[12]: https://pytorch.org/ +[13]: https://twitter.com/smaffulli +[0]: https://img.linux.net.cn/data/attachment/album/202311/02/215953yyz45l5l3v4fzqyv.jpg \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/sources/talk/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md b/sources/talk/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md deleted file mode 100644 index 2b9d02b672..0000000000 --- a/sources/talk/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,96 +0,0 @@ -[#]: subject: "Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change" -[#]: via: "https://news.itsfoss.com/open-source-definition-ai/" -[#]: author: "Sourav Rudra https://news.itsfoss.com/author/sourav/" -[#]: collector: "lujun9972/lctt-scripts-1693450080" -[#]: translator: " " -[#]: reviewer: " " -[#]: publisher: " " -[#]: url: " " - -Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change -====== -Do you think that the open-source licenses should evolve? -We started the year 2023 with **Artificial Intelligence (AI) being one of the biggest catches** , we also saw many companies going all in into this. - -Take for instance **Mozilla** , who entered 2023 with [plans to work on open-source AI][1] to develop various types of AI-powered solutions, or even **HuggingChat** , the [first open source alternative to ChatGPT][2]. - -Even Meta is no stranger to that, they have their [**Llama 2**][3] large language model (LLM) that has been making waves all year round, they even announced a **[**ChatGPT contender**][4]** a few months back. - -However, many have [raised questions][5] that **Meta's Llama 2 is not as open as one would expect** , and that does seem the case when one looks at its open-source license. - -The license **doesn't allow using Llama 2 for services that have over 700 million daily users** , and it also **cannot be used to train other language models**. - -This also means that Meta's license for **Llama 2 doesn't meet all the requirements of the Open Source Initiative's (OSI)[Open Source Definition][6]**. - -One can argue that open-source licenses implemented by the likes of [EleutherAI][7] and [Falcon 40B][8] are a good example of how open source licensing should be handled for AI. - -But, Meta has a different take on it. - -![][9] - -### Open Source Licensing Needs to Evolve - -In conversation with [The Verge][10], the VP for AI research over at Meta, [**Joëlle Pineau**][11] defended their stand. - -She says that there is **a need to balance between the benefits of information sharing** and the **potential costs that could be incurred to Meta's business**. - -This approach to open source has allowed their researchers to take a more focused approach in handling their AI projects. She also adds: - -> Being open has internally changed how we approach research, and it drives us not to release anything that isn’t very safe and be responsible at the onset. - -Joëlle also hopes that they can have the same level of enthusiasm with their generative AI models that they have seen in the past with their [**PyTorch**][12] initiative, - -But, the **problem lies with current licensing schemes**. She adds that, these licenses were not meant to work with software that leverage large amounts of data from a multitude of sources. - -This in turn gives **limited liability to both the users and the developers** , with **limited indemnity to copyright infringement** (read as: protection against). - -Furthermore, she added that: - -> AI models are different from software because there are more risks involved, so I think we should evolve the current user licenses we have to fit AI models better. - -> But I’m not a lawyer, so I defer to them on this point. - -I do agree with her on that, there is a need to update current licenses to better fit AI models, among other things. - -And it appears that **the OSI are already on the job**. [**Stefano Maffulli**][13], the executive director of OSI, has told The Verge that they understand that the **current OSI-approved licenses are not up to the job for AI models**. - -They are in the process of reviewing how to work with AI developers to provide a “ **transparent, permissionless, yet safe** ” access to models. - -He also added that: - -> We definitely have to rethink licenses in a way that addresses the real limitations of copyright and permissions in AI models while keeping many of the tenets of the open source community. - -Regardless of what happens, it is clear that **open-source standards will have to evolve to accommodate new and emerging tech** , while not being just limited to AI. - -I am looking forward to how the open-source licensing changes in the coming years. - -_💬 What about you? Do you think that older open-source standards need to be updated?_ - -* * * - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -via: https://news.itsfoss.com/open-source-definition-ai/ - -作者：[Sourav Rudra][a] -选题：[lujun9972][b] -译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) -校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) - -本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 - -[a]: https://news.itsfoss.com/author/sourav/ -[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972 -[1]: https://news.itsfoss.com/mozilla-open-source-ai/ -[2]: https://news.itsfoss.com/huggingchat-chatgpt/ -[3]: https://ai.meta.com/llama/ -[4]: https://news.itsfoss.com/meta-open-source-chatgpt/ -[5]: https://www.wired.com/story/the-myth-of-open-source-ai/ -[6]: https://opensource.org/osd/ -[7]: https://www.eleuther.ai/ -[8]: https://www.tii.ae/news/uaes-technology-innovation-institute-launches-open-source-falcon-40b-large-language-model -[9]: https://news.itsfoss.com/content/images/2023/04/Follow-us-on-Google-News.png -[10]: https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/30/23935587/meta-generative-ai-models-open-source -[11]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo%C3%ABlle_Pineau -[12]: https://pytorch.org/ -[13]: https://twitter.com/smaffulli