mirror of
https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git
synced 2024-12-26 21:30:55 +08:00
translated the rest of ubuntu vs ubuntu on windows
This commit is contained in:
vic
parent
3b2bbb4e5d
commit
5dd4558bf4
@ -21,15 +21,15 @@ Windows的Linux子系统测试在上周刚刚完成所有测试，并放出升
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
First up was the SQLite embedded database benchmark. The out-of-the-box Ubuntu/Bash on Windows performance was quite slow, but when switching that 14.04 environment to 16.04 LTS, the performance was much faster. However, for this disk-heavy workload the native Ubuntu Linux installations were almost twice as fast as relying upon the Windows Subsystem for Linux.
|
||||
首先是SQLite嵌入式数据库基准测试.这个盒子外的Ubuntu/Bash on Windows性能是相当的慢,但是如果切换环境从14.04到16.04LTS, 性能会块很多.然而, 对于重磁盘的工作负载,原生Ubuntu Linux比Windows的子系统Linux快了近2倍.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The CompileBench test profile as additional disk-focused workloads show that this is the particular subsystem really straining the Ubuntu performance atop Windows 10 with it being up to multiple times slower.
|
||||
编译测试作为额外的重磁盘测试显示, 定制的Windows子系统真的成倍的限制了Ubuntu性能.
|
||||
|
||||
Next up were some basic system memory speed tests with Stream.
|
||||
接下来,是一些使用Stream的基本的系统内存速度测试
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -37,29 +37,29 @@ Next up were some basic system memory speed tests with Stream.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Strangely, the Stream memory benchmarks show better performance with Ubuntu on Windows than Ubuntu itself! This happened on both the 14.04 and 16.04 based environments that the Windows results came out faster.
|
||||
奇怪的是, 这些内存的基准测试显示Ubuntu on Windows的性能比原生的Ubuntu好!这个现象同时发生在基于同样的Windows却环境不同的14.04和16.04上.
|
||||
|
||||
Next are more of the CPU-heavy tests,
|
||||
接下来, 是一些重CPU测试.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
With the Dolfyn scientific test, the performance between Ubuntu on Windows and Ubuntu installed bare metal was actually quite close. With Ubuntu 16.04 the performance is slower on both platforms due to the newer GCC compiler regressing the performance.
|
||||
通过Dolfyn科学测试，Ubuntu On Windows和原生Ubuntu之间的性能其实是相当接近的。 对于Ubuntu 16.04，由于较新的GCC编译器回退性能，两个平台上的性能都较慢。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Fhourstones and John The Ripper show that the performance of Ubuntu running on Windows via the Windows Subsystem for Linux can be incredibly close to the bare metal Ubuntu Linux performance!
|
||||
透过Fhourstones和John The Ripper表明，通过在Windows上运行Linux子系统的Ubuntu的性能可以非常接近裸机Ubuntu Linux性能！
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The x264 results were another strange case similar to Stream where the best performance was actually with Ubuntu on Windows 10 via WSL!
|
||||
类似于Stream, x264结果是另一个奇怪的情况，其中最好的性能实际上是使用WSL Ubuntu On Windows！
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The timed compilation benchmarks were heavily in favor of the bare metal Ubuntu Linux installations outside of Windows. This is likely due to these large program compilations requiring plenty of disk reads and from the earlier disk-focused benchmarks showing that is the big area where the Windows Subsystem for Linux is slow.
|
||||
定时编译基准测试非常利于裸机Ubuntu Linux. 这是由于大型程序编译需要大量读写磁盘, 先前测试已经发现了, 基于Windows的子系统缓慢的大灾区.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ The timed compilation benchmarks were heavily in favor of the bare metal Ubuntu
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Many of our other common open-source benchmarks show that for the strictly CPU-focused tests, the Windows Subsystem for Linux is close -- or even matches -- the native Ubuntu Linux performance running on the actual hardware.
|
||||
许多其他的通用开源基准测试表明, 严格的重CPU测试, Windows子系统的Ubuntu的性能是很接近的, 甚至是相等与原生安装在实际硬盘中的Ubuntu Linux.
|
||||
|
||||
These latest Windows Subsystem for Linux results are actually rather impressive. The big letdown is just the continued slow disk/file-system performance, but for CPU-bound workloads the results are very compelling. There's also the rare cases with x264 and Stream where the performance of the Ubuntu user-space on Windows appears to clearly outperform that of Ubuntu Linux running on the hardware by itself.
|
||||
最新的Window的Linux子系统,测试结果实际上相当令人印象深刻。让人沮丧仅仅只是持续缓慢的磁盘/文件系统性能，但是对于受CPU限制的工作负载，结果是非常引人注目的。还有很罕见的x264和Stream测试，Ubuntu On Windows上的性能似乎明显优于运行在硬件上的Ubuntu Linux。
|
||||
|
||||
Overall the experience was actually quite pleasant and haven't run into any other bugs or annoyances while running with Ubuntu/Bash on Windows. If you're interested in more Windows vs. Linux benchmarks, please consider voicing yourself as a Phoronix Premium subscriber.
|
||||
总的来说, 测试实验是十分愉快的并且在Ubuntu/Bash on Windows也没有遇到任何其他的bug.如果你有还兴趣了解更多关于Windows和Linux的基准测试, 欢迎留言讨论.
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
via: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=windows10-anv-wsl&num=1
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user