document/TranslateProject
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git synced 2025-01-25 23:11:02 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

已翻译by Luox .... 翻译的有点坑 请见谅 -_-||

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Luoxcat 2013-11-16 21:44:01 +08:00
parent f12d476dbb
commit 58ffdb37fd
2 changed files with 35 additions and 34 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

34
sources/KDE and Canonical Conflict Over Mir Finally Bursts into Open.md
View File

@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
这几天盖帽了 -.- Luox
KDE and Canonical Conflict Over Mir Finally Bursts into Open
================================================================================
The conflict that has been brewing between the KDE developers and Canonical has finally exploded in a flurry of statements which show just how many problems the Mir display server has caused.
KDE and Canonical, especially Mark Shuttleworth, have been friends for a long time. Once upon a time, back in 2006, Mark Shuttleworth was the first patron of KDE and people were uttering things like this:
“I have no doubt that you will do the right thing once you actually see the true potential that KDE4 could bring. You are a true visionary. The world needs more people like you,” said one of the members of the KDE community.
Seven years later, Canonical announces a new displayer server and everything that KDE, Kubuntu, and Canonical communities have built together goes out the window.
The war of declarations has culminated with [a post written by Mark Shuttleworth][1] in which he grouped all the people that have been criticizing the Mir display server, on purely political reasons in his opinion, into a virtual “Tea Party”. A lot of people took offense, especially a couple of prolific KDE developers who opposed Mir straight from the get-go.
KDE Plasma developers and president of KDE e.v, Aaron Seigo, challenged Mark Shuttleworth to a debate regarding the issue. [The founder of Canonical has ignored][2] his request, which prompted a second reaction which turned out to be a lot more acid that the first comments.
The second reaction came from one of the Kwin developers and maintainers, Martin Gräßlin, which has basically [said goodbye to the Ubuntu community][3]. The reactions to his Google+ post have been mixed and it promoted a reaction from the Ubuntu community manager, Jono Bacon.
“Open Source has been and will always be filled with very energetic discussion. In some cases this discussion blurs into the area of rudeness and disrespect. The difficulty is that everyone's definition of what is rude and disrespectful is different. Likewise, everyone's definition of good and bad conduct is different,” said Jono Bacon in his post.
He expressed his regret towards the decision of Martin Gräßlin, but he also pointed out the Ubuntu Code of Conduct 2.0, which has been broken so many times it's hard to keep count.
As it stands right now, KDE will never adopt Mir, Kubuntu will probably follow suite, and the days of this Ubuntu flavor are probably numbered.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: http://news.softpedia.com/news/KDE-and-Canonical-Conflict-Over-Mir-Finally-Bursts-into-Open-396651.shtml
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) 校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译，[Linux中国](http://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[1]:http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mark-Shuttleworth-Says-That-Mir-Opponents-Have-Formed-the-Open-Source-Tea-Party-392793.shtml
[2]:http://news.softpedia.com/news/KDE-Developer-and-President-of-KDE-e-v-Upset-Because-Mark-Shuttleworth-Is-Ignoring-Him-396623.shtml
[3]:http://news.softpedia.com/news/Major-KDE-Developer-Says-Goodbye-to-Ubuntu-396429.shtml

35
translated/KDE and Canonical Conflict Over Mir Finally Bursts into Open.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
KDE和Canonical的关于Mir的冲突最终爆发了
================================================================================
KDE开发者和Canonical酿造的冲突在一连串Mir显示服务器所造成的问题后最终爆发了.
KDE对Canonical,尤其是马克·沙特尔沃思,有很深的交情.曾几何时,在2006年,马克·沙特尔沃思克是第一个赞助KDE的人,人们总会像这样谈论这件事:
“我毫不怀疑一旦你看到KDE4所带来的巨大潜能,你所做是正确的.你是个真正有远见的人.这个世界需要更多的像你一样的人.”一位KDE社区成员所述.
七年过去了,Canonical宣布了一款新的显示服务器Mir,所有KDE,Kubuntu,和Canonical社区已经携手抛弃window.
[一篇由马克·沙特尔沃思写的文章][1]最终成为了战争的导火索,其中写道他分组里的所有人已经开始批判Mir显示服务器,建立了一个虚拟的“茶话会”,可在他看来这纯粹是政治原因.有很多人批判了,尤其是几个高级KDE开发者,它们在一开始就反对Mir.
KDE Plasma 开发者兼KDE组织主席,亚伦·塞戈,就这个问题向马克·沙特尔沃思发起争论.[Canonical的创始人忽视了他的请求][2],这引起了一系列反应.
第二个反应的是一位Kwin的开发者和维护者, Martin Gräßlin, 他说这基本上[可以跟Ubuntu社区说Goodbye了][3].在他的Google+上跟Ubuntu社区经理Jono Bacon的对话已经占满了所有回帖.
“开源总是个很火的话题.有时候讨论时会带点粗鲁和不敬.难点是每个人对于粗鲁和无礼的定义是有区别的.就像,每个人对于好和坏行为评定是不同的” Jono Bacon在他帖子所述.
他对于Martin Gräßlin的决定表示遗憾,但他也指出了Ubuntu的2.0行为准则,被打破了很多次已经很难计数了.
按照现在的情况,KDE绝不会采用Mir,Kubuntu可能伴有配件,也许跟这风气的Ubuntu已经时日不多.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: http://news.softpedia.com/news/KDE-and-Canonical-Conflict-Over-Mir-Finally-Bursts-into-Open-396651.shtml
译者：[Luoxcat](https://github.com/Luoxcat) 校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译，[Linux中国](http://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[1]:http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mark-Shuttleworth-Says-That-Mir-Opponents-Have-Formed-the-Open-Source-Tea-Party-392793.shtml
[2]:http://news.softpedia.com/news/KDE-Developer-and-President-of-KDE-e-v-Upset-Because-Mark-Shuttleworth-Is-Ignoring-Him-396623.shtml
[3]:http://news.softpedia.com/news/Major-KDE-Developer-Says-Goodbye-to-Ubuntu-396429.shtml