document/TranslateProject
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git synced 2024-12-26 21:30:55 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #3107 from XLCYun/master

Browse Source 
第一节翻译完成 XLCYun
This commit is contained in:
joeren 2015-08-03 07:28:48 +08:00
commit 49ad4fcfad
2 changed files with 55 additions and 55 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

55
sources/tech/20150716 A Week With GNOME As My Linux Desktop--What They Get Right & Wrong - Page 1 - Introduction.md
View File

@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
Translating by XLCYun.
A Week With GNOME As My Linux Desktop: What They Get Right & Wrong - Page 1 - Introduction
================================================================================
*Author's Note: If by some miracle you managed to click this article without reading the title then I want to re-iterate something... This is an editorial. These are my opinions. They are not representative of Phoronix, or Michael, these are my own thoughts.*
Additionally, yes... This is quite possibly a flame-bait article. I hope the community is better than that, because I do want to start a discussion and give feedback to both the KDE and Gnome communities. For that reason when I point out, what I see as, a flaw I will try to be specific and direct so that any discussion can be equally specific and direct. For the record: The alternative title for this article was "Death By A Thousand [Paper Cuts][1]".
Now, with that out of the way... Onto the article.
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=fedora-22-fan&image=fedora_22_good1_show&w=1920)
When I sent the [Fedora 22 KDE Review][2] off to Michael I did it with a bit of a bad taste in my mouth. It wasn't because I didn't like KDE, or hadn't been enjoying Fedora, far from it. In fact, I started to transition my T450s over to Arch Linux but quickly decided against that, as I enjoyed the level of convenience that Fedora brings to me for many things.
The reason I had a bad taste in my mouth was because the Fedora developers put a lot of time and effort into their "Workstation" product and I wasn't seeing any of it. I wasn't using Fedora the way the main developers had intended it to be used and therefore wasn't getting the "Fedora Experience." It felt like someone reviewing Ubuntu by using Kubuntu, using a Hackintosh to review OS X, or reviewing Gentoo by using Sabayon. A lot of readers in the forums bash on Michael for reviewing distributions in their default configurations-- myself included. While I still do believe that reviews should be done under 'real-world' configurations, I do see the value in reviewing something in the condition it was given to you-- for better or worse.
It was with that attitude in mind that I decided to take a dip in the Gnome pool.
I do, however, need to add one more disclaimer... I am looking at KDE and Gnome as they are packaged in Fedora. OpenSUSE, Kubuntu, Arch, etc, might all have different implementations of each desktop that will change whether my specific 'pain points' are relevant to your distribution. Furthermore, despite the title, this is going to be a VERY KDE heavy article. I called the article what I did because it was actually USING Gnome that made me realize how many "paper cuts" KDE actually has.
### Login Screen ###
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=gnome-week-editorial&image=gnome_week_login1_show&w=1920)
I normally don't mind Distributions shipping distro-specific themes, because most of them make the desktop look nicer. I finally found my exception.
First impression's count for a lot, right? Well, GDM definitely gets this one right. The login screen is incredibly clean with consistent design language through every single part of it. The use of common-language icons instead of text boxes helps in that regard.
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=gnome-week-editorial&image=gnome_week_login2_show&w=1920)
That is not to say that the Fedora 22 KDE login screen-- now SDDM rather than KDM-- looks 'bad' per say but its definitely more jarring.
Where's the fault? The top bar. Look at the Gnome screenshot-- you select a user and you get a tiny little gear simple for selecting what session you want to log into. The design is clean, it gets out of your way, you could honestly miss it completely if you weren't paying attention. Now look at the blue KDE screenshot, the bar doesn't look it was even rendered using the same widgets, and its entire placement feels like an after thought of "Well shit, we need to throw this option somewhere..."
The same can be said for the Reboot and Shutdown options in the top right. Why not just a power button that creates a drop down menu that has a drop down for Reboot, Shutdown, Suspend? Having the buttons be different colors than the background certainly makes them stick out and be noticeable... but I don't think in a good way. Again, they feel like an after thought.
GDM is also far more useful from a practical standpoint, look again along the top row. The time is listed, there's a volume control so that if you are trying to be quiet you can mute all sounds before you even login, there's an accessibility button for things like high contrast, zooming, test to speech, etc, all available via simple toggle buttons.
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=gnome-week-editorial&image=gnome_week_login3_show&w=1920)
Swap it to upstream's Breeze theme and... suddenly most of my complaints are fixed. Common-language icons, everything is in the center of the screen, but the less important stuff is off to the sides. This creates a nice harmony between the top and bottom of the screen since they are equally empty. You still have a text box for the session switcher, but I can forgive that since the power buttons are now common language icons. Current time is available which is a nice touch, as is a battery life indicator. Sure gnome still has a few nice additions, such as the volume applet and the accessibility buttons, but Breeze is a step up from Fedora's KDE theme.
Go to Windows (pre-Windows 8 & 10...) or OS X and you will see similar things – very clean, get-out-of-your-way lock screens and login screens that are devoid of text boxes or other widgets that distract the eye. It's a design that works and that is non-distracting. Fedora... Ship Breeze by default. VDG got the design of the Breeze theme right. Don't mess it up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gnome-week-editorial&num=1
作者：Eric Griffith
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[1]:https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts
[2]:http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora-22-kde&num=1

55
translated/tech/20150716 A Week With GNOME As My Linux Desktop--What They Get Right & Wrong - Page 1 - Introduction.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
将GNOME作为我的Linux桌面的一周:　他们做对的与做错的　- 第一节 - 简介
================================================================================
*作者声明:　如果你是因为某种神迹而在没看标题的情况下点开了这篇文章,那么我想再重申一些东西...这是一篇评论文章。文中的观点都是我自己的，不代表Phoronix和Michael的观点。它们完全是我自己的想法。
另外，没错……这可能是一篇引战的文章。我希望社团成员们更沉稳一些，因为我确实想在KDE和Gnome的社团上发起讨论，反馈。因此当我想指出——我所看到的——一个瑕疵时，我会尽量地做到具体而直接。这样，相关的讨论也能做到同样的具体和直接。再次声明：本文另一可选标题为“被[剪纸][1]千刀万剐”（原文剪纸一词为papercuts, 指易修复而烦人的漏洞，译者注)。
现在，重申完毕……文章开始。
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=fedora-22-fan&image=fedora_22_good1_show&w=1920)
当我把[《评价Fedora 22 KDE》][2]一文发给Michael时，感觉很不是滋味。不是因为我不喜欢KDE，或者不享受Fedora，远非如此。事实上，我刚开始想把我的T450s的系统换为Arch Linux时，马上又决定放弃了，因为我很享受fedora在很多方面所带来的便捷性。
我感觉很不是滋味的原因是Fedora的开发者花费了大量的时间和精力在他们的“工作站”产品上，但是我却一点也没看到。在使用Fedora时，我采用的并非那些主要开发者希望用户采用的那种使用方式，因此我也就体验不到所谓的“Fedora体验”。它感觉就像一个人评价Ubuntu时用的却是Kubuntu，评价OS X时用的却是Hackintosh，或者评价Gentoo时用的却是Sabayon。根据大量Michael论坛的读者的说法，它们在评价各种发行版时使用的都是默认设置的发行版——我也不例外。但是我还是认为这些评价应该在“真实”配置下完成，当然我也知道在给定的情况下评论某些东西也的确是有价值的——无论是好是坏。
正是在怀着这种态度的情况下，我决定到Gnome这个水坑里来泡泡澡。
但是，我还要在此多加一个声明……我在这里所看到的KDE和Gnome都是打包在Fedora中的。OpenSUSE, Kubuntu, Arch等发行版的各个桌面可能有不同的实现方法，使得我这里所说的具体的“痛处”跟你所用的发行版有所不同。还有，虽然用了这个标题，但这篇文章将会是一篇很沉重的非常“KDE”的文章。之所以这样称呼这篇文章，是因为我在使用了Gnome之后，才知道KDE的“剪纸”到底有多多。
### 登录界面 ###
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=gnome-week-editorial&image=gnome_week_login1_show&w=1920)
我一般情况下都不会介意发行版装载它们自己的特别主题，因为一般情况下桌面看起来会更好看。可我今天可算是找到了一个例外。
第一印象很重要，对吧？那么，GDM（Gnome Display Manage：Gnome显示管理器，译者注，下同。）决对干得漂亮。它的登录界面看起来极度简洁，每一部分都应用了一致的设计风格。使用通用图标而不是输入框为它的简洁加了分。
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=gnome-week-editorial&image=gnome_week_login2_show&w=1920)
这并不是说Fedora 22 KDE——现在已经是SDDM而不是KDM了——的登录界面不好看，但是看起来决对没有它这样和谐。
问题到底出来在哪？顶部栏。看看Gnome的截图——你选择一个用户，然后用一个很小的齿轮简单地选择想登入哪个会话。设计很简洁，它不挡着你的道儿，实话讲，如果你没注意的话可能完全会看不到它。现在看看那蓝色（ blue，有忧郁之意，一语双关，译者注）的KDE截图，顶部栏看起来甚至不像是用同一个工具渲染出来的，它的整个位置的安排好像是某人想着：“哎哟妈呀，我们需要把这个选项扔在哪个地方……”之后决定下来的。
对于右上角的重启和关机选项也一样。为什么不单单用一个电源按钮，点击后会下拉出一个菜单，里面包括重启，关机，挂起的功能？按钮的颜色跟背景色不同肯定会让它更加突兀和显眼……但我可不觉得这样子有多好。同样，这看起来可真像“苦思”后的决定。
从实用观点来看，GDM还要远远实用的多，再看看顶部一栏。时间被列了出来，还有一个音量控制按钮，如果你想保持周围安静，你甚至可以在登录前设置静音，还有一个可用的按钮来实现高对比度，缩放，语音转文字等功能，所有可用的功能通过简单的一个开关按钮就能得到。
![](http://www.phoronix.net/image.php?id=gnome-week-editorial&image=gnome_week_login3_show&w=1920)
切换到上流的Breeve主题……突然间，我抱怨的大部分问题都被完善了。通用图标，所有东西都放在了屏幕中央，但不是那么重要的被放到了一边。因为屏幕顶部和底部都是同样的空白，在中间也就酝酿出了一种美好的和谐。还是有一个输入框来切换会话，但既然电源按钮被做成了通用图标，那么这点还算可以原谅。当然gnome还是有一些很好的附加物，例如音量小程序和可访问按钮，但Breeze总归是Fedora的KDE主题的一个进步。
到Windows(Windows 8和10之前）或者OS X中去，你会看到类似的东西——非常简洁的，“不挡你道”的锁屏与登录界面，它们都没有输入框或者其它分散视觉的小工具。这是一种有效的不分散人注意力的设计。Fedora……默认装有Breeze。VDG在Breeze主题设计上干得不错。可别糟蹋了它。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gnome-week-editorial&num=1
作者：Eric Griffith
译者：[XLCYun](https://github.com/XLCYun)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创翻译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[1]:https://wiki.ubuntu.com/One%20Hundred%20Papercuts
[2]:http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora-22-kde&num=1
[3]:https://launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts