From 31981ef9157d0d800fe56cfca7e24f66b8b1685c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ezio Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:22:35 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?20181022-2=20=E9=80=89=E9=A2=98?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit @qhwdw --- ...r Open Source, Goodbye Proprietary UEFI.md | 126 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+) create mode 100644 sources/tech/20181006 LinuxBoot for Servers - Enter Open Source, Goodbye Proprietary UEFI.md diff --git a/sources/tech/20181006 LinuxBoot for Servers - Enter Open Source, Goodbye Proprietary UEFI.md b/sources/tech/20181006 LinuxBoot for Servers - Enter Open Source, Goodbye Proprietary UEFI.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..de0a4260db --- /dev/null +++ b/sources/tech/20181006 LinuxBoot for Servers - Enter Open Source, Goodbye Proprietary UEFI.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +qhwdw is translating + +LinuxBoot for Servers: Enter Open Source, Goodbye Proprietary UEFI +============================================================ + +[LinuxBoot][13] is an Open Source [alternative][14] to Proprietary [UEFI][15] firmware. It was released last year and is now being increasingly preferred by leading hardware manufacturers as default firmware. Last year, LinuxBoot was warmly [welcomed][16]into the Open Source family by The Linux Foundation. + +This project was an initiative by Ron Minnich, author of LinuxBIOS and lead of [coreboot][17] at Google, in January 2017. + +Google, Facebook, [Horizon Computing Solutions][18], and [Two Sigma][19] collaborated together to develop the [LinuxBoot project][20] (formerly called [NERF][21]) for server machines based on Linux. + +Its openness allows Server users to easily customize their own boot scripts, fix issues, build their own [runtimes][22] and [reflash their firmware][23] with their own keys. They do not need to wait for vendor updates. + +Following is a video of [Ubuntu Xenial][24] booting for the first time with NERF BIOS: + +[视频](https://youtu.be/HBkZAN3xkJg) + +Let’s talk about some other advantages by comparing it to UEFI in terms of Server hardware. + +### Advantages of LinuxBoot over UEFI + +![LinuxBoot vs UEFI](https://4bds6hergc-flywheel.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/linuxboot-uefi.png) + +Here are some of the major advantages of LinuxBoot over UEFI: + +### Significantly faster startup + +It can boot up Server boards in less than twenty seconds, versus multiple minutes on UEFI. + +### Significantly more flexible + +LinuxBoot can make use of any devices, filesystems and protocols that Linux supports. + +### Potentially more secure + +Linux device drivers and filesystems have significantly more scrutiny than through UEFI. + +We can argue that UEFI is partly open with [EDK II][25] and LinuxBoot is partly closed. But it has been [addressed][26] that even such EDK II code does not have the proper level of inspection and correctness as the [Linux Kernel][27] goes through, while there is a huge amount of other Closed Source components within UEFI development. + +On the other hand, LinuxBoot has a significantly smaller amount of binaries with only a few hundred KB, compared to the 32 MB of UEFI binaries. + +To be precise, LinuxBoot fits a whole lot better into the [Trusted Computing Base][28], unlike UEFI. + +[Suggested readBest Free and Open Source Alternatives to Adobe Products for Linux][29] + +LinuxBoot has a [kexec][30] based bootloader which does not support startup on Windows/non-Linux kernels, but that is insignificant since most clouds are Linux-based Servers. + +### LinuxBoot adoption + +In 2011, the [Open Compute Project][31] was started by [Facebook][32] who [open-sourced][33] designs of some of their Servers, built to make its data centers  more efficient. LinuxBoot has been tested on a few Open Compute Hardware listed as under: + +* Winterfell + +* Leopard + +* Tioga Pass + +More [OCP][34] hardware are described [here][35] in brief. The OCP Foundation runs a dedicated project on firmware through [Open System Firmware][36]. + +Some other devices that support LinuxBoot are: + +* [QEMU][9] emulated [Q35][10] systems + +* [Intel S2600wf][11] + +* [Dell R630][12] + +Last month end, [Equus Compute Solutions][37] [announced][38] the release of its [WHITEBOX OPEN™][39] M2660 and M2760 Servers, as a part of their custom, cost-optimized Open-Hardware Servers and storage platforms. Both of them support LinuxBoot to customize the Server BIOS for flexibility, improved security, and create a blazingly fast booting experience. + +### What do you think of LinuxBoot? + +LinuxBoot is quite well documented [on GitHub][40].  Do you like the features that set it apart from UEFI? Would you prefer using LinuxBoot rather than UEFI for starting up Servers, owing to the former’s open-ended development and future? Let us know in the comments below. + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +via: https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/ + +作者：[ Avimanyu Bandyopadhyay][a] +选题：[oska874][b] +译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) +校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) + +本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 + +[a]:https://itsfoss.com/author/avimanyu/ +[b]:https://github.com/oska874 +[1]:https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/# +[2]:https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/# +[3]:https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/# +[4]:https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/# +[5]:https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/# +[6]:https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/# +[7]:https://itsfoss.com/author/avimanyu/ +[8]:https://itsfoss.com/linuxboot-uefi/#comments +[9]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QEMU +[10]:https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Q35 +[11]:https://trmm.net/S2600 +[12]:https://trmm.net/NERF#Installing_on_a_Dell_R630 +[13]:https://www.linuxboot.org/ +[14]:https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=LinuxBoot-OSFC-2018-State +[15]:https://itsfoss.com/check-uefi-or-bios/ +[16]:https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/2018/01/system-startup-gets-a-boost-with-new-linuxboot-project/ +[17]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coreboot +[18]:http://www.horizon-computing.com/ +[19]:https://www.twosigma.com/ +[20]:https://trmm.net/LinuxBoot_34c3 +[21]:https://trmm.net/NERF +[22]:https://trmm.net/LinuxBoot_34c3#Runtimes +[23]:http://www.tech-faq.com/flashing-firmware.html +[24]:https://itsfoss.com/features-ubuntu-1604/ +[25]:https://www.tianocore.org/ +[26]:https://media.ccc.de/v/34c3-9056-bringing_linux_back_to_server_boot_roms_with_nerf_and_heads +[27]:https://medium.com/@bhumikagoyal/linux-kernel-development-cycle-52b4c55be06e +[28]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing_base +[29]:https://itsfoss.com/adobe-alternatives-linux/ +[30]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kexec +[31]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Compute_Project +[32]:https://github.com/facebook +[33]:https://github.com/opencomputeproject +[34]:https://www.networkworld.com/article/3266293/lan-wan/what-is-the-open-compute-project.html +[35]:http://hyperscaleit.com/ocp-server-hardware/ +[36]:https://www.opencompute.org/projects/open-system-firmware +[37]:https://www.equuscs.com/ +[38]:http://www.dcvelocity.com/products/Software_-_Systems/20180924-equus-compute-solutions-introduces-whitebox-open-m2660-and-m2760-servers/ +[39]:https://www.equuscs.com/servers/whitebox-open/ +[40]:https://github.com/linuxboot/linuxboot