GraveAccent翻译完成

This commit is contained in:
GraveAccent 2018-09-25 23:25:55 +08:00
parent b351698276
commit 244a857e0f
2 changed files with 205 additions and 206 deletions

View File

@ -1,206 +0,0 @@
GraveAccent 翻译中 Conditional Rendering in React using Ternaries and Logical AND
============================================================
![](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*eASRJrCIVgsy5VbNMAzD9w.jpeg)
Photo by [Brendan Church][1] on [Unsplash][2]
There are several ways that your React component can decide what to render. You can use the traditional `if` statement or the `switch` statement. In this article, well explore a few alternatives. But be warned that some come with their own gotchas, if youre not careful.
### Ternary vs if/else
Lets say we have a component that is passed a `name` prop. If the string is non-empty, we display a greeting. Otherwise we tell the user they need to sign in.
Heres a Stateless Function Component (SFC) that does just that.
```
const MyComponent = ({ name }) => {
if (name) {
return (
<div className="hello">
Hello {name}
</div>
);
}
return (
<div className="hello">
Please sign in
</div>
);
};
```
Pretty straightforward. But we can do better. Heres the same component written using a conditional ternary operator.
```
const MyComponent = ({ name }) => (
<div className="hello">
{name ? `Hello ${name}` : 'Please sign in'}
</div>
);
```
Notice how concise this code is compared to the example above.
A few things to note. Because we are using the single statement form of the arrow function, the `return` statement is implied. Also, using a ternary allowed us to DRY up the duplicate `<div className="hello">` markup. 🎉
### Ternary vs Logical AND
As you can see, ternaries are wonderful for `if/else` conditions. But what about simple `if` conditions?
Lets look at another example. If `isPro` (a boolean) is `true`, we are to display a trophy emoji. We are also to render the number of stars (if not zero). We could go about it like this.
```
const MyComponent = ({ name, isPro, stars}) => (
<div className="hello">
<div>
Hello {name}
{isPro ? '🏆' : null}
</div>
{stars ? (
<div>
Stars:{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
```
But notice the “else” conditions return `null`. This is becasue a ternary expects an else condition.
For simple `if` conditions, we could use something a little more fitting: the logical AND operator. Heres the same code written using a logical AND.
```
const MyComponent = ({ name, isPro, stars}) => (
<div className="hello">
<div>
Hello {name}
{isPro && '🏆'}
</div>
{stars && (
<div>
Stars:{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
```
Not too different, but notice how we eliminated the `: null` (i.e. else condition) at the end of each ternary. Everything should render just like it did before.
Hey! What gives with John? There is a `0` when nothing should be rendered. Thats the gotcha that I was referring to above. Heres why.
[According to MDN][3], a Logical AND (i.e. `&&`):
> `expr1 && expr2`
> Returns `expr1` if it can be converted to `false`; otherwise, returns `expr2`. Thus, when used with Boolean values, `&&` returns `true` if both operands are true; otherwise, returns `false`.
OK, before you start pulling your hair out, let me break it down for you.
In our case, `expr1` is the variable `stars`, which has a value of `0`. Because zero is falsey, `0` is returned and rendered. See, that wasnt too bad.
I would write this simply.
> If `expr1` is falsey, returns `expr1`, else returns `expr2`.
So, when using a logical AND with non-boolean values, we must make the falsey value return something that React wont render. Say, like a value of `false`.
There are a few ways that we can accomplish this. Lets try this instead.
```
{!!stars && (
<div>
{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
```
Notice the double bang operator (i.e. `!!`) in front of `stars`. (Well, actually there is no “double bang operator”. Were just using the bang operator twice.)
The first bang operator will coerce the value of `stars` into a boolean and then perform a NOT operation. If `stars` is `0`, then `!stars` will produce `true`.
Then we perform a second NOT operation, so if `stars` is 0, `!!stars` would produce `false`. Exactly what we want.
If youre not a fan of `!!`, you can also force a boolean like this (which I find a little wordy).
```
{Boolean(stars) && (
```
Or simply give a comparator that results in a boolean value (which some might say is even more semantic).
```
{stars > 0 && (
```
#### A word on strings
Empty string values suffer the same issue as numbers. But because a rendered empty string is invisible, its not a problem that you will likely have to deal with, or will even notice. However, if you are a perfectionist and dont want an empty string on your DOM, you should take similar precautions as we did for numbers above.
### Another solution
A possible solution, and one that scales to other variables in the future, would be to create a separate `shouldRenderStars` variable. Then you are dealing with boolean values in your logical AND.
```
const shouldRenderStars = stars > 0;
```
```
return (
<div>
{shouldRenderStars && (
<div>
{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
```
Then, if in the future, the business rule is that you also need to be logged in, own a dog, and drink light beer, you could change how `shouldRenderStars` is computed, and what is returned would remain unchanged. You could also place this logic elsewhere where its testable and keep the rendering explicit.
```
const shouldRenderStars =
stars > 0 && loggedIn && pet === 'dog' && beerPref === 'light`;
```
```
return (
<div>
{shouldRenderStars && (
<div>
{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
```
### Conclusion
Im of the opinion that you should make best use of the language. And for JavaScript, this means using conditional ternary operators for `if/else`conditions and logical AND operators for simple `if` conditions.
While we could just retreat back to our safe comfy place where we use the ternary operator everywhere, you now possess the knowledge and power to go forth AND prosper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
作者简介:
Managing Editor at the American Express Engineering Blog http://aexp.io and Director of Engineering @AmericanExpress. MyViews !== ThoseOfMyEmployer.
----------------
via: https://medium.freecodecamp.org/conditional-rendering-in-react-using-ternaries-and-logical-and-7807f53b6935
作者:[Donavon West][a]
译者:[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
校对:[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译,[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]:https://medium.freecodecamp.org/@donavon
[1]:https://unsplash.com/photos/pKeF6Tt3c08?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText
[2]:https://unsplash.com/search/photos/road-sign?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText
[3]:https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Logical_Operators

View File

@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
在 React 条件渲染中使用三元表达式和 “&&
============================================================
![](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*eASRJrCIVgsy5VbNMAzD9w.jpeg)
Photo by [Brendan Church][1] on [Unsplash][2]
React 组件可以通过多种方式决定渲染内容。你可以使用传统的 if 语句或 switch 语句。在本文中,我们将探讨一些替代方案。但要注意,如果你不小心,有些方案会带来自己的陷阱。
### 三元表达式 vs if/else
假设我们有一个组件被传进来一个 `name` prop。 如果这个字符串非空,我们会显示一个问候语。否则,我们会告诉用户他们需要登录。
这是一个只实现了如上功能的无状态函数式组件。
```
const MyComponent = ({ name }) => {
if (name) {
return (
<div className="hello">
Hello {name}
</div>
);
}
return (
<div className="hello">
Please sign in
</div>
);
};
```
这个很简单但是我们可以做得更好。这是使用三元运算符编写的相同组件。
```
const MyComponent = ({ name }) => (
<div className="hello">
{name ? `Hello ${name}` : 'Please sign in'}
</div>
);
```
请注意这段代码与上面的例子相比是多么简洁。
有几点需要注意。因为我们使用了箭头函数的单语句形式所以隐含了return语句。另外使用三元运算符允许我们省略掉重复的 `<div className="hello">` 标记。🎉
### 三元表达式 vs &&
正如您所看到的,三元表达式用于表达 if/else 条件式非常好。但是对于简单的 if 条件式怎么样呢?
让我们看另一个例子。如果 isPro一个布尔值为真我们将显示一个奖杯表情符号。我们也要渲染星星的数量如果不是0。我们可以这样写。
```
const MyComponent = ({ name, isPro, stars}) => (
<div className="hello">
<div>
Hello {name}
{isPro ? '🏆' : null}
</div>
{stars ? (
<div>
Stars:{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
```
请注意 “else” 条件返回 null 。 这是因为三元表达式要有"否则"条件。
对于简单的 “if” 条件式,我们可以使用更合适的东西:&& 运算符。这是使用 “&&” 编写的相同代码。
```
const MyComponent = ({ name, isPro, stars}) => (
<div className="hello">
<div>
Hello {name}
{isPro && '🏆'}
</div>
{stars && (
<div>
Stars:{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
```
没有太多区别,但是注意我们消除了每个三元表达式最后面的 `: null` else 条件式)。一切都应该像以前一样渲染。
约翰得到了什么当什么都不应该渲染时只有一个0。这就是我上面提到的陷阱。这里有解释为什么。
[根据 MDN][3],一个逻辑运算符“和”(也就是`&&`
> `expr1 && expr2`
> 如果 `expr1` 可以被转换成 `false` ,返回 `expr1`;否则返回 `expr2`。 如此,当与布尔值一起使用时,如果两个操作数都是 true`&&` 返回 `true` ;否则,返回 `false`
好的,在你开始拔头发之前,让我为你解释它。
在我们这个例子里, `expr1` 是变量 `stars`,它的值是 `0`因为0是 falsey 的值, `0` 会被返回和渲染。看,这还不算太坏。
我会简单地这么写。
> 如果 `expr1` 是 falsey返回 `expr1` ,否则返回 `expr2`
所以,当对非布尔值使用 “&&” 时,我们必须让 falsy 的值返回 React 无法渲染的东西,比如说,`false` 这个值。
我们可以通过几种方式实现这一目标。让我们试试吧。
```
{!!stars && (
<div>
{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
```
注意 `stars` 前的双感叹操作符( `!!`)(呃,其实没有双感叹操作符。我们只是用了感叹操作符两次)。
第一个感叹操作符会强迫 `stars` 的值变成布尔值并且进行一次“非”操作。如果 `stars``0` ,那么 `!stars` 会 是 `true`
然后我们执行第二个`非`操作,所以如果 `stars` 是0`!!stars` 会是 `false`。正好是我们想要的。
如果你不喜欢 `!!`,那么你也可以强制转换出一个布尔数比如这样(这种方式我觉得有点冗长)。
```
{Boolean(stars) && (
```
或者只是用比较符产生一个布尔值(有些人会说这样甚至更加语义化)。
```
{stars > 0 && (
```
#### 关于字符串
空字符串与数字有一样的毛病。但是因为渲染后的空字符串是不可见的所以这不是那种你很可能会去处理的难题甚至可能不会注意到它。然而如果你是完美主义者并且不希望DOM上有空字符串你应采取我们上面对数字采取的预防措施。
### 其它解决方案
一种可能的将来可扩展到其他变量的解决方案,是创建一个单独的 `shouldRenderStars` 变量。然后你用“&&”处理布尔值。
```
const shouldRenderStars = stars > 0;
```
```
return (
<div>
{shouldRenderStars && (
<div>
{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
```
之后,在将来,如果业务规则要求你还需要已登录,拥有一条狗以及喝淡啤酒,你可以改变 `shouldRenderStars` 的得出方式,而返回的内容保持不变。你还可以把这个逻辑放在其它可测试的地方,并且保持渲染明晰。
```
const shouldRenderStars =
stars > 0 && loggedIn && pet === 'dog' && beerPref === 'light`;
```
```
return (
<div>
{shouldRenderStars && (
<div>
{'⭐️'.repeat(stars)}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
```
### 结论
我认为你应该充分利用这种语言。对于 JavaScript这意味着为 `if/else` 条件式使用三元表达式,以及为 `if` 条件式使用 `&&` 操作符。
我们可以回到每处都使用三元运算符的舒适区,但你现在消化了这些知识和力量,可以继续前进 && 取得成功了。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
作者简介:
美国运通工程博客的执行编辑 http://aexp.io 以及 @AmericanExpress 的工程总监。MyViews !== ThoseOfMyEmployer.
----------------
via: https://medium.freecodecamp.org/conditional-rendering-in-react-using-ternaries-and-logical-and-7807f53b6935
作者:[Donavon West][a]
译者:[GraveAccent](https://github.com/GraveAccent)
校对:[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译,[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]:https://medium.freecodecamp.org/@donavon
[1]:https://unsplash.com/photos/pKeF6Tt3c08?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText
[2]:https://unsplash.com/search/photos/road-sign?utm_source=unsplash&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=creditCopyText
[3]:https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Logical_Operators