diff --git a/sources/talk/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md b/sources/talk/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2b9d02b672
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sources/talk/20231101 Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+[#]: subject: "Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change"
+[#]: via: "https://news.itsfoss.com/open-source-definition-ai/"
+[#]: author: "Sourav Rudra https://news.itsfoss.com/author/sourav/"
+[#]: collector: "lujun9972/lctt-scripts-1693450080"
+[#]: translator: " "
+[#]: reviewer: " "
+[#]: publisher: " "
+[#]: url: " "
+
+Open Source Definition for AI Models Need a Change
+======
+Do you think that the open-source licenses should evolve?
+We started the year 2023 with **Artificial Intelligence (AI) being one of the biggest catches** , we also saw many companies going all in into this.
+
+Take for instance **Mozilla** , who entered 2023 with [plans to work on open-source AI][1] to develop various types of AI-powered solutions, or even **HuggingChat** , the [first open source alternative to ChatGPT][2].
+
+Even Meta is no stranger to that, they have their [**Llama 2**][3] large language model (LLM) that has been making waves all year round, they even announced a **[**ChatGPT contender**][4]** a few months back.
+
+However, many have [raised questions][5] that **Meta's Llama 2 is not as open as one would expect** , and that does seem the case when one looks at its open-source license.
+
+The license **doesn't allow using Llama 2 for services that have over 700 million daily users** , and it also **cannot be used to train other language models**.
+
+This also means that Meta's license for **Llama 2 doesn't meet all the requirements of the Open Source Initiative's (OSI)[Open Source Definition][6]**.
+
+One can argue that open-source licenses implemented by the likes of [EleutherAI][7] and [Falcon 40B][8] are a good example of how open source licensing should be handled for AI.
+
+But, Meta has a different take on it.
+
+![][9]
+
+### Open Source Licensing Needs to Evolve
+
+In conversation with [The Verge][10], the VP for AI research over at Meta, [**Joëlle Pineau**][11] defended their stand.
+
+She says that there is **a need to balance between the benefits of information sharing** and the **potential costs that could be incurred to Meta's business**.
+
+This approach to open source has allowed their researchers to take a more focused approach in handling their AI projects. She also adds:
+
+> Being open has internally changed how we approach research, and it drives us not to release anything that isn’t very safe and be responsible at the onset.
+
+Joëlle also hopes that they can have the same level of enthusiasm with their generative AI models that they have seen in the past with their [**PyTorch**][12] initiative,
+
+But, the **problem lies with current licensing schemes**. She adds that, these licenses were not meant to work with software that leverage large amounts of data from a multitude of sources.
+
+This in turn gives **limited liability to both the users and the developers** , with **limited indemnity to copyright infringement** (read as: protection against).
+
+Furthermore, she added that:
+
+> AI models are different from software because there are more risks involved, so I think we should evolve the current user licenses we have to fit AI models better.
+
+> But I’m not a lawyer, so I defer to them on this point.
+
+I do agree with her on that, there is a need to update current licenses to better fit AI models, among other things.
+
+And it appears that **the OSI are already on the job**. [**Stefano Maffulli**][13], the executive director of OSI, has told The Verge that they understand that the **current OSI-approved licenses are not up to the job for AI models**.
+
+They are in the process of reviewing how to work with AI developers to provide a “ **transparent, permissionless, yet safe** ” access to models.
+
+He also added that:
+
+> We definitely have to rethink licenses in a way that addresses the real limitations of copyright and permissions in AI models while keeping many of the tenets of the open source community.
+
+Regardless of what happens, it is clear that **open-source standards will have to evolve to accommodate new and emerging tech** , while not being just limited to AI.
+
+I am looking forward to how the open-source licensing changes in the coming years.
+
+_💬 What about you? Do you think that older open-source standards need to be updated?_
+
+* * *
+
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+via: https://news.itsfoss.com/open-source-definition-ai/
+
+作者：[Sourav Rudra][a]
+选题：[lujun9972][b]
+译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
+校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
+
+本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
+
+[a]: https://news.itsfoss.com/author/sourav/
+[b]: https://github.com/lujun9972
+[1]: https://news.itsfoss.com/mozilla-open-source-ai/
+[2]: https://news.itsfoss.com/huggingchat-chatgpt/
+[3]: https://ai.meta.com/llama/
+[4]: https://news.itsfoss.com/meta-open-source-chatgpt/
+[5]: https://www.wired.com/story/the-myth-of-open-source-ai/
+[6]: https://opensource.org/osd/
+[7]: https://www.eleuther.ai/
+[8]: https://www.tii.ae/news/uaes-technology-innovation-institute-launches-open-source-falcon-40b-large-language-model
+[9]: https://news.itsfoss.com/content/images/2023/04/Follow-us-on-Google-News.png
+[10]: https://www.theverge.com/2023/10/30/23935587/meta-generative-ai-models-open-source
+[11]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo%C3%ABlle_Pineau
+[12]: https://pytorch.org/
+[13]: https://twitter.com/smaffulli