document/TranslateProject
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject.git synced 2024-12-26 21:30:55 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #4980 from geekpi/master

Browse Source 
translated
This commit is contained in:
geekpi 2017-01-19 11:06:32 +08:00 committed by GitHub
commit 041e5c519a
2 changed files with 38 additions and 40 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

40
sources/talk/20170118 Do I need to provide access to source code under the AGPLv3 license.md
View File

@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
translating---geekpi
Do I need to provide access to source code under the AGPLv3 license?
============================================================
![Do I need to provide access to source code under the AGPLv3 license?](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/styles/image-full-size/public/images/law/LAW_PatentSpotlight_520x292_cm.png.png?itok=bCn-kMx2 "Do I need to provide access to source code under the AGPLv3 license?")
Image by : 
opensource.com
The [GNU Affero General Public License version 3][1] (AGPLv3) is a copyleft license nearly identical to the GPLv3\. Both licenses have the same copyleft scope, but materially differ in one important way. The AGPLv3's Section 13 states an additional condition not present in GPLv2 or GPLv3:
> Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge, through some standard or customary means of facilitating copying of software.
This condition was intended to apply mainly to what would now be considered SaaS deployments, although the reach of "interacting remotely through a computer network" should perhaps be read to cover situations going beyond conventional SaaS. The objective was to close a perceived loophole in the ordinary GPL in environments where users make use of functionality provided as a web service, but no distribution of the code providing the functionality occurs. Hence, Section 13 provides an additional source code disclosure requirement beyond the object code distribution triggered requirement contained in GPLv2 Section 3 and GPLv3 and AGPLv3 Section 6.
What is often misunderstood is that the source code requirement in AGPLv3 Section 13 is triggered only where the AGPLv3 software has been modified by "you" (for example, the entity providing the network service). My interpretation is that, so long as "you" do not modify the AGPLv3 code, the license should not be read as requiring access to the Corresponding Source in the manner prescribed by Section 13\. As I see it, many unmodified and standard deployments of software modules under AGPL simply do not trigger Section 13, although making the source code available even if not required under the license is a good idea.
How terms and conditions of the AGPL could be interpreted, including whether the AGPL software has been modified, may require legal analysis depending on the facts and details of the specific use case.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
作者简介：
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/styles/profile_pictures/public/pictures/kaufman-picture.jpg?itok=FPIizDR-)
Jeffrey R. Kaufman is an Open Source IP Attorney for Red Hat, Inc., the world’s leading provider of open source software solutions. Jeffrey also serves as an adjunct professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law. Previous to Red Hat, Jeffrey served as Patent Counsel at Qualcomm Incorporated providing open source counsel to the Office of the Chief Scientist. Jeffrey holds multiple patents in RFID, barcoding, image processing, and printing technologies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://opensource.com/article/17/1/providing-corresponding-source-agplv3-license
作者：[Jeffrey Robert Kaufman][a]
译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]:https://opensource.com/users/jkaufman
[1]:https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0-standalone.html

38
translated/talk/20170118 Do I need to provide access to source code under the AGPLv3 license.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
我需要在 AGPLv3 许可证下提供源码么？
============================================================
![Do I need to provide access to source code under the AGPLv3 license?](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/styles/image-full-size/public/images/law/LAW_PatentSpotlight_520x292_cm.png.png?itok=bCn-kMx2 "Do I need to provide access to source code under the AGPLv3 license?")
图片提供：
opensource.com
[GNU Affero 通用公共许可证版本 3][1]（A​​GPLv3）是与 GPLv3 几乎相同的公共版权许可证。两个许可证具有相同的公共版权范围，但在一个重要方面有重大差异。 AGPLv3 的第 13 节规定了 GPLv2 或 GPLv3 中不存在的附加条件：
>你必须给你那些使用计算机网络远程（如果你的版本支持此类交互）与它交互的用户提供一个通过网络服务器利用一些标准或者常规复制手段免费获得相关你的版本的源码的机会。
尽管“通过计算机网络远程交互”的范围应该被理解为涵盖超越常规 SaaS 的情况，但是这个条件主要适用于目前被认为是 SaaS 的部署。目标是在用户使用 web 服务提供功能但是不提供功能代码的分发的环境中关闭普通 GPL 中的感知漏洞。因此，第 13 节提供了超出 GPLv2 第 3 节以及 GPLv3 和 AGPLv3 第 6 节中包含的目标代码分发触发要求的额外源码公开要求。
常常被误解的是，AGPLv3 第 13 节中的源代码要求仅在 AGPLv3 软件已被“你”（例如，提供网络服务的实体）修改的地方触发。我的解释是，只要“你”不修改 AGPLv3 的代码，许可证不应该被理解为需要按照第 13 节规定的方式访问相应的源码。如我所见，尽管即使公开许可证不必要的源代码也是一个好主意，但在 AGPL 下许多未修改以及标准部署的软件模块根本不会触发第 13 节。
如何解释 AGPL 的条款和条件，包括 AGPL 软件是否已被修改，可能需要根据具体情况的事实和细节进行法律分析。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
作者简介：
![](https://opensource.com/sites/default/files/styles/profile_pictures/public/pictures/kaufman-picture.jpg?itok=FPIizDR-)
Jeffrey R. Kaufman 是全球领先的开源软件解决方案提供商 Red Hat 公司的开源 IP 律师。Jeffrey 也是托马斯·杰斐逊法学院的兼职教授。在入职 Red Hat 之前，Jeffrey 曾经担任高通公司的专利顾问，向首席科学家办公室提供开源顾问。Jeffrey在 RFID、条形码、图像处理和打印技术方面拥有多项专利。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
via: https://opensource.com/article/17/1/providing-corresponding-source-agplv3-license
作者：[Jeffrey Robert Kaufman][a]
译者：[geekpi](https://github.com/geekpi)
校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID)
本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出
[a]:https://opensource.com/users/jkaufman
[1]:https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0-standalone.html