From 795035082e71ef6a4c97f603fe3d210a1d8e277b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "eric.xiaozhen" Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:15:19 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Translate finished --- ...tate Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md | 104 ------------------ ...tate Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md | 99 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 sources/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md create mode 100644 translated/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md diff --git a/sources/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md b/sources/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md deleted file mode 100644 index df649cd722..0000000000 --- a/sources/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,104 +0,0 @@ -Eriwoon 认领翻译 -The State Of JavaScript: JavaScript Flavors -=========== - - -One thing that distinguishes JavaScript from other programming languages is that JavaScript isn’t just one language: it’s actually more like a family of closely related cousins. - -What started with CoffeeScript back in 2009 has become an explosion of choice over the past couple years: ES6, TypeScript, Elm… they all have their strengths, and they all compile down to good old JavaScript. - -So after last week’s look at front-end frameworks, let’s look at what the State Of JavaScript survey can tell us about JavaScript Flavors. - -Disclaimer: these are preliminary results extracted from a partial dataset. They’re just a way for me to share some insights while I take my time to come up with the best way to present the complete results. - -Note: if you haven’t taken the survey yet, now would be the perfect time to do it! It’ll only take 10 minutes and you can come back here after :) - -### Awareness - -First, I wanted to find out the percentage of respondents that were aware of each of the six options’ existence: - -- Good Old Plain JavaScript: 97% -- ES6: 98% -- CoffeeScript: 99% -- TypeScript: 98% -- Elm: 66% -- ClojureScript: 77% - -You would expect that “Good Old Plain JavaScript” would score 100% awareness, but I imagine some people couldn’t resist the temptation of picking “I’ve never heard of JavaScript” in a JavaScript survey… - -ES6, CoffeeScript, and TypeScript all have near-perfect awareness, which surprised me since TypeScript isn’t quite as widespread as the other two. - -Elm and ClojureScript on the other hand have much lower scores, which makes sense since they’re more tied to their own ecosystems, and harder to use in existing apps. - -### Interest - -Next, let’s look at which flavors have been generating the most interest among developers who haven’t used them yet: - -![](https://embed.chartblocks.com/1.0/?c=57c4dc599973d2525fee820a&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fmedia%2F63092db0523a37d9d33ce6c014d727f6%3FmaxWidth%3D700&t=3efc9491eba2ce2#) - -Remember we’re looking at non-users here, so it makes sense that there would be very few people who haven’t used Plain JavaScript. - -It’s interesting to look at ES6: a large proportion of developers have already jumped on the bandwagon, and almost all (89%) of those who haven’t yet want to learn it as well. - -TypeScript and Elm are in the same boat: not many people have used them, but they have 53% and 58% interest scores respectively, which isn’t bad by any means. - -If I had to guess, I’d say that both TypeScript and Elm might be having a hard time articulating their advantages to the average JavaScript developer. After all it’s hard to understand the advantages of something like static typing if all you know is JavaScript. - -Also, few developers have used CoffeeScript, and apparently almost nobody wants to learn it. There goes my plan to write a 12-volume CoffeeScript Encyclopedia… - -### Satisfaction - -We now come to the key question: how many developers have used each specific flavor, and how many would use it again? - -![](https://embed.chartblocks.com/1.0/?c=57c4e5f79973d29461ee820a&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fmedia%2F1fe4bbdf807f87883fa108e31c6927d5%3FmaxWidth%3D700&t=1061d2ab8fc9838#) - - -While plain JavaScript has larger usage numbers as expected, in terms of satisfaction the big winner here is ES6, and I think it’s safe to say it’s now the default way to write JavaScript apps. -TypeScript and Elm both also have similarly high satisfaction percentages, around 85%. And once more, poor CoffeeScript trails the poll with only 17% of developers willing to consider it again. - -### Happiness - -Finally, I asked people how happy they were with their current way of writing JavaScript: - -![](https://embed.chartblocks.com/1.0/?c=57c4cd8c9973d2d95bee820a&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fmedia%2F538138b2d91d1fa99f1696bef4dd4d3f%3FmaxWidth%3D700&t=f53efb029ea4456#) - - -The high scores we saw in the previous question are confirmed here: with an average score of 3.96 overall, people are really happy with JavaScript as a language. - -It’s hard to say if this is because of JavaScript’s recent improvements, or because maybe (just maybe) JavaScript isn’t as horrible a language as people make it to be. But it’s certainly comforting. - -### Conclusions - -If React and Vue were the clear winners last time, I would say that here it’s without a doubt ES6. This is not groundbreaking news by any means, but it’s nice to know the community is embracing the direction the language is taking. - -It will be really interesting to ask these questions again a year or so from now, and see if TypeScript, Elm, and ClojureScript have made any progress. - -Personally, I suspect this explosion of flavors is just the beginning, and that the way we write JavaScript a couple years from now might be quite different! - -### Share the Word & Stay Tuned - -When it comes to surveys like this one, more data equals better data! The more people take the survey, the more representative of the overall JavaScript community it will be. - -So if you can, I encourage you to share the survey: - -[On Twitter][1] - -[On Facebook][2] - -And if you’d like to know next time I publish results, [head to the survey homepage][3] and leave your email there to be notified! - - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -via: https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/spark-comparison-aws-vs-gcp?utm_source=dbweekly&utm_medium=email - -作者：[Sacha Greif][a] -译者：[译者ID](https://github.com/译者ID) -校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) - -本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 - -[a]: https://medium.com/@sachagreif -[1]: https://twitter.com/intent/tweet/?text=The%20State%20Of%20JavaScript%3A%20take%20a%20short%20survey%20about%20popular%20JavaScript%20technologies%20http%3A%2F%2Fstateofjs.com%20%23stateofjs -[2]: https://facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fstateofjs.com -[3]: http://stateofjs.com/ diff --git a/translated/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md b/translated/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ce43bf2300 --- /dev/null +++ b/translated/tech/20160830 The State Of JavaScript - JavaScript Flavors.md @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +JavaScript 现状：方言篇 +=========== + +JavaScript 和其他编程语言有一个很大的不同，它不像单纯的一个语言，而像一个由众多方言组成大家族。 + +从2009年 CoffeeScript 的出现开始，近几年出现了大量基于 JavaScript 语言，或者叫方言，例如 ES6，TypeScript，Elm 等等。它们都有自己的优势，且都可以被完美编译成标准 JavaScript。 + +所以，继上周的前端框架篇，今天带来 JavaScript 现状之方言篇，看一下大家对于 JavaScript 的方言是怎么选择的。 + +> 声明：下面的结论是根据部分数据得出的初步结果，希望能将我的一些想法带给大家，对于完整数据后面我会用更好方式呈现出来。 + +> 注意：如果你还没有参与这个调查，现在就来参加吧，可以花十分钟完成调查然后再回来看这篇文章。 + +### 认知度 + +首先，我想看一下参与问卷调查的人是否**知道**下面六种语言： + +- 经典的 JavaScript: 97% +- ES6: 98% +- CoffeeScript: 99% +- TypeScript: 98% +- Elm: 66% +- ClojureScript: 77% + +你可能觉得100%的人都应该知道『经典的 JavaScript 』，我想是有人无法抵抗『我从来没有听说过 JavaScript 』这个选项的强大诱惑吧…… + +几乎所有人都知道 ES6、CoffeeScript 和 TypeScript 这三种语言，比较令我惊讶的是 TypeScript 竟然会稍微落后于 ES6 和 CoffeeScript。 + +另一方面，Elm 和 ClojureScript 得分就要低得多，当然这也有道理，因为它们跟自己的生态环境绑定的比较紧密，也很难在已有的 App 中进行使用。 + +### 兴趣度 + +接下来，让我们一起看一下，哪一种方言吸引新开发者的能力更强一些： + +![](https://d3ugvbs94d921r.cloudfront.net/57c4dc599973d2525fee820a.png?t=3efc9491eba2ce2) + +要注意，表是统计该语言对从未使用过它们的用户的吸引度，因为只有很少人没有用过经典 JavaScript，所以『经典 JavaScript 』这一列的数值很低。 + +ES6的数值很有趣：已有很大比例的用户在使用 ES6 了，没有用过的人中的绝大部分（89%）也很想学习它。 + +TypeScript 和 Elm 的状态差不多：用过的人不多，但感兴趣的比例表现不错，分别是 53% 和 58%。 + +如果让我预测一下，那我觉得 TypeScript 和 Elm 都很难向普通的 JavaScript 开发者讲明自己的优势。毕竟如果开发者只懂 JavaScript 的话，你很难解释清楚静态类型的好处。 + +另外，只有很少开发者用过 CoffeeScript，而且很明显几乎没人想去学。我觉得我该写一本 12 卷厚的 CoffeeScript 百科全书了…… + +### 满意度 + +现在是最重要的问题的时间了：有多少开发者用过这些语言，有多少人还想继续使用这些方言呢？ + +![](https://d3ugvbs94d921r.cloudfront.net/57c4e5f79973d29461ee820a.png?t=1061d2ab8fc9838) + +虽然经典 JavaScript 拥有最多的用户量，但就满意度来说 ES6 才是大赢家，而且我想现在已经能安全的说，ES6 可以作为开发 JavaScript App 默认的语言。 +TypeScript 和 Elm 有相似的高满意度，都在 85% 上下。然后，只有可怜的 17% 的开发者会考虑继续使用 CoffeeScript。 + +### 快乐度 + +最后一个问题，我问大家在用现在的方式写 JavaScript 时是否感到快乐： + +![](https://d3ugvbs94d921r.cloudfront.net/57c4cd8c9973d2d95bee820a.png?t=f53efb029ea4456) + +这个问题的答案和上一个问题的满意度想匹配：平均分达到 3.96 分（1 - 5 分），大家在使用 JavaScript 时候确实是快乐的。 + +不过很难说高分是因为 JavaScript 最近的一些改进造成的呢，还是发现 JavaScript 可能（仅仅是可能）没有大家认为的那么讨厌。总之，JavaScript 令人满意。 + +### 总结 + +如果说上次的赢家是 React 和 Vue，那此次调查的冠军毫无争议是 ES6 了。 ES6 并带来没有开天辟地的变化，但整个社区都还是很认可当前 JavaScript 演进方向的。 + +我觉得一年之后我们再来一次这样的调查，结果会很有趣。同时也可以关注一下 TypeScript、Elm 还有ClojureScript 有没有继续进步。 + +个人认为，当前 JavaScript 大家庭百花齐放的现象还只是一个开始，或许几年之后 JavaScript 就会变得非常不同了。 + +### 结语&敬请期待 + +对于我这样的调查来说数据越多就意味着数据越准确！越多人参加这个调查，那就越能代表整个 JavaScript 社区。 + +所以，我十分希望你能帮忙分享这个调查问卷： + +[On Twitter][1] + +[On Facebook][2] + +另外，如果你想收到我下一个调查结果分析，前往 [调查问卷主页][3] 并留下自己的邮箱吧。 + +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +via: https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/spark-comparison-aws-vs-gcp?utm_source=dbweekly&utm_medium=email + +作者：[Sacha Greif][a] +译者：[eriwoon](https://github.com/eriwoon) +校对：[校对者ID](https://github.com/校对者ID) + +本文由 [LCTT](https://github.com/LCTT/TranslateProject) 原创编译，[Linux中国](https://linux.cn/) 荣誉推出 + +[a]: https://medium.com/@sachagreif +[1]: https://twitter.com/intent/tweet/?text=The%20State%20Of%20JavaScript%3A%20take%20a%20short%20survey%20about%20popular%20JavaScript%20technologies%20http%3A%2F%2Fstateofjs.com%20%23stateofjs +[2]: https://facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fstateofjs.com +[3]: http://stateofjs.com/