From c5f17176759bd65fe45b08f63b130e55a3b2e91c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Maurer <jens.maurer@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:28:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] refer to "Library Submission Process" instead of explaining
 outdated procedures

[SVN r8860]
---
 faq.htm | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/faq.htm b/faq.htm
index cf88065..d218e6c 100644
--- a/faq.htm
+++ b/faq.htm
@@ -23,11 +23,8 @@
 
 <h1>Frequently Asked Questions</h1>
 
-<p><b>How is a library accepted for posting on the site?</b> An initial review by the
-library master filters out libraries which do not meet the absolute requirements (must be
-C++, ownership clear, reasonable format, etc.)&nbsp; The author is free to rework and
-resubmit libraries which do not pass initial muster. This is encouraged, particularly when
-reviewers like the idea behind a library but feel that details are lacking.</p>
+<p><b>How is a library accepted for posting on the site?</b>
+See <a href="submission_process.htm">Library Submission Process</a></p>
 
 <p><b>Is there any assurance libraries actually work as claimed?</b> No. The review
 process will hopefully eliminate the most seriously flawed libraries, but a well